Mumbai Investigations, Media and A Conspiracy of Silence

Some excerpts below from an intensely thought-provoking article by Radha Rajan. Although I do not agree with everything in the article, I believe it will trigger a debate that we all need to have but are shying away from:

*** Excerpts from Mumbai terror probe – silence of the conspirators ***

There is a growing feeling among a small section of political commentators and the politically well-informed that there is a sinister silence in certain quarters of the media and the Indian intelligentsia about the core details of the Mumbai’s terror attack even as the government undertakes a major cover-up operation and goes through the motions of conducting a hard-nosed investigation into the terror plot.

Almost as if to cover-up this silence, television channels are giving us an overdose of shrill women – socialites and film personalities, Bollywood’s angry young and old men who saw in these TV discussions an opportunity to flaunt the secular credentials of the rich, famous and usually blasé Mumbaikar. These normally indifferent and bored rich Mumbaikars were shaken awake into the real world as jihadi terror, for the first time, made them victims of its malevolent attention.

…while they are an usually non-caring and self-absorbed lot, disturbed by nationalism and the passion of ordinary mortals who have not been spoilt by money and fame, this class took the opportunity to make a few shrill noises about the virtues of the politics of minority-ism; they also indulged in nauseating binges of diatribe against politicians in general.

…This group spoke about their insecurities, about their fears and anger, about politicians letting them down but not one spoke about how this terror attack was an assault on the dignity of the nation, a violation of the sanctity of national borders or how this was an attack on India’s integrity and her self-identity.

Not a word was uttered about concern for the nation, it was I, me, myself and my own all the way.

While almost all of them waxed eloquent about safeguarding and protecting Christians and Muslims, no one was invited to speak for the Hindus. Barkha Dutt of course had a Muslim sitting prominently in her programme and as usual she put her arms solicitously around the poor grieving man’s shoulders. Simi Grewal’s challenge that she would take people to show them localities in Mumbai, where inhabitants have raised the Pakistani flag all over, was exorcised the next day on the repeat show. The silence of the conspirators had begun.

The key to understanding how and why the terror attacks happened lies in the investigations into the Malegaon blasts and the character of Hemant Karkare, the chief of Maharashtra ATS; and it is on this issue that the silence of the media, the chatterati, our verbose counter-terrorism experts, the Maharashtra Government and the UPA government in Delhi is most deafening.

This resounding silence is a dead give-away that the really guilty have not resigned, have not been axed and have not even been exposed. And that is why this silence is the silence of conspirators.

Hemant Karkare is dead allegedly while bravely fighting the terrorists and so we may never know the truth. But we can connect the dots and the picture it makes causes grave disquiet. Some say he died of bullets to the chest, some say to the neck, some say bullet proof vests are use against AK 47s and Kalashnikovs while others say Karkare had removed his bullet proof vest and was killed when he was seated in his car.

Long before the Mumbai terror attack, I had expressed the view to two of my friends that the thrust of the investigations into the Malegaon blasts is not to find the accused guilty but to weaken any future BJP government’s measures to deal with jihad, jihadis and religious conversion undertaken by Islam and the Church and to question the government’s motives.

…The entire (Malegaon) investigation had the following fall-out (abridged list):

3. Bring army intelligence agencies (Lt. Col. Purohit) into disrepute so that any action resulting from army intelligence against jihadis and jihad-sponsoring outfits and nations can be laid at the door of ‘Hindu extremists’ in the army.

4. The resultant disrepute is that the Indian Army is communalised and anti-Muslim by nature

5. Label Hindu sadhus and sanyasis as terrorists so that any resistance from Hindu society to jihad and religious conversion may, in future be labeled as acts of terror by “sangh-parivar outfits”. The national debate on Bangladeshi Muslims, the pan-national loyalty of all Muslims to the Ummah and religious conversion would thus conveniently acquire ‘Hindu terror’ dimensions.

6. Undermine people’s faith in all institutions and organizations wielding great moral authority and influence, and this includes our police and armed forces.

…The media has been reporting that Hemant Karkare died a very unhappy man. He is alleged to have expressed his deep unhappiness about ‘political interference’ into the Malegaon blasts investigations to two media persons of two English TV news channels. Karkare is also reported to have asked the Maharashtra Home Minister RR Patil, on the very day he died, to be transferred out of the ATS. Such was his unhappiness.

We have it from one of the media persons who spoke to Karkare the day before he died that Karkare told him that over 90% of the ATS had been diverted into the Malegaon blasts probe.

This witch-hunt for Hindu terrorists has all the hallmark of having been conceived in the mind of a strategist for the Congress party or its President, and who was probably himself/herself being manipulated by string-pullers located elsewhere.

The questions and suspicions that come to our mind (abridged list):

1. The Times of India, dated 27th November, 2008, on page 11 reported that Hemant Karkare met the National Security Adviser (NSA) MK Narayanan in Delhi.

4. Why did the NSA summon the ATS chief Karkare to Delhi unless it was to seek an explanation as to why the ATS failed to get custody of Sadhvi Pragya and Lt.Col. Purohit in the MCOCA court.

6. If Karkare had seven years of experience in R&AW, almost all of them overseas appointments, why was he removed from R&AW and appointed chief of ATS?

7. Who chose Karkare for the job and why was he chosen when he had little or no field experience in tackling terror in Mumbai?

11. Who chose MK Narayanan as National Security Adviser when he had worked for the Ford Foundation funded American think-tank, Center for Security Analysis, just prior to his appointment?

We get the sinking feeling that the FBI and the Scotland Yard are here to “take charge” of the investigations only to make sure that their readings of all evidence will not point to Pakistan. The US and the UK need Pakistan for more reasons than one and it is my conjecture that their conclusions are going to be different from those of Indian investigating agencies.

…The silence about why India permitted the non-reciprocal measure of foreign investigating agencies to come to India to “assist in the investigations” is also mystifying. While the media is going after Vilasrao Deshmulh, Achutananthan, Ramgoal Verma and Shivraj Patil, it has kept its hands off the NSA. Who is pulling the media strings?

…Shivraj Patil was the least guilty among them all. The guiltiest will be the person who chose these people for these posts.

…this writer believes (that the Malegaon blasts probe) was the single most important reason why the UPA government, the NSA and the Maharshtra ATS looked away from jihad, jihadis and jihadi outfits at home and across the border. Pakistan is guilty, and guilty are the jihadis but more guilty are those who abused their power to misuse state instruments for vested interests, endangering in the process the nation’s borders and the security of its citizens.

*** End of Excerpts ***

Related Posts:

Of Students and Sadhvis…

Malegaon, SIMI, “rule in and rule out”…

Pl. also see A very Good Idea.

B Shantanu

Political Activist, Blogger, Advisor to start-ups, Seed investor. One time VC and ex-Diplomat. Failed mushroom farmer; ex Radio Jockey. Currently involved in Reclaiming India - One Step at a Time.

You may also like...

6 Responses

  1. Hrishi says:

    How does one interpret Rajasthan voting trends (Cong leading big)? Is it that MSM’s agenda is working or the anti-incumbency motivation is too strong to even halt the ‘anger’ coming from Mumbai Terror?

  2. Krishen Kak says:

    Please forward to Mr. Ramesh Thakur

    Dear Mr Thakur,

    This is with reference to your statement quoted below.

    Could you kindly name the “Hindu terrorists responsible for the Malegaon blasts” as well as the appropriate authority that has decided they are responsible?

    If they are Sadhvi Pragnya and Col Purohit, you will be aware that, in spite of repeated narco-analyses of the two, no sustainable evidence whatsoever has emerged against them. Indeed, the primary accusation against the former is her having sold her motorcycle some years ago to someone else allegedly involved in Malegaon, and against the latter is now his alleged involvement in some forgery of documents of some property. That’s all.

    An early clarification is requested.

    Thank you,

    Krishen Kak

    *** Statement from The Hindu ***

    “Related to this, at least initially the political leaders and parties eschewed their traditional rivalry of competitive demagoguery that mobilises competing Hindu and Muslim bases by pointing the finger of criminality at Muslims (“Not all Muslims are terrorists but all terrorists are Muslims” – a thesis negated by the Hindu terrorists responsible for the Malegaon blasts in September) and the demonisation of a whole community for the sins of a tiny radicalised faction.” – Ramesh Thakur (founding director the Balsillie School of International Affairs in Waterloo, Ontario)

  3. Krishen ji,

    What about :

    http://specials.rediff.com/news/2008/nov/22slide-malegaon-probe-accused-speaks1.htm

    But still, that was only an isolated incident, and not a conspiracy against the nation. And the media went hyper on it too. And by saying that the Hindutva “thesis was negated” by Malegaon, aren’t they implicitly agreeing that there was no Hindu terrorist up to that point?

    BTW I am happy with this sentence in Radha Rajan’s article :
    Almost as if to cover-up this silence, television channels are giving us an overdose of shrill women – socialites and film personalities, Bollywood’s angry young and old men who saw in these TV discussions an opportunity to flaunt the secular credentials of the rich, famous and usually blasé Mumbaikar.

    There are both Pakistan-loving men and women, but among Pakistan-loving Hindus women dominate. My statements to that effect have always been received with disbelief and dismissal, but now there is a somewhat famous woman activist accepting that.

  4. By Pakistan-loving I meant “excessively biased in favor of Pakistan” – people who are ever ready to point out India’s and US’ and Israel’s faults, demanding that India cooperate with Pakistan, but never making a similar statement about Pakistan’s faults or demanding that Pakistan cooperate.

  5. Ashwani Aheer says:

    Wonderfull coincidense. You have sir spoken my heart and my mind in your article. Bravo, U are simply GREAT.My hats off to you. Every true indian must read it.May U live long.

  6. B Shantanu says:

    Dear Ashwani…The credit must go to Radha-ji, not me. She wrote this piece.