In the season of fasts, does anyone remember Jatin Das?

From “Remember Jatindra Nath Das?” by Sh Balbir K Punj (emphasis added):

On September 13, 1929, a youth from Bengal gave up his life in a prison of Lahore fasting for 63 days. He literally fasted unto death in Gandhian fashion though Mahatma Gandhi himself never touched that apogee despite undertaking 17 fasts unto death in his lifetime.

…does any Congressman remember Jatindra Nath Das (1904-1929), who adopted the Gandhian instrument of fast unto death and adhered to it steadfastly unto his last? Of millions in the country who swore by Gandhism, Jatin Das alone walked till the end of path.

…As proved by the popular agitations against Simon Commission, the political fahrenheit of the country had shot up during 1927-28. For the Congress, time was propitious to launch its first mass movement since ‘Non-Cooperation’. The Subhas Chandra Bose faction was in favour of capitalising on this occasion and make ‘complete independence’ the creed of the Congress. But Gandhiji, whose decisions were prompted by things like ‘conscience’ and ‘inner voice’, said he could not see any ‘light’ in it. In the 1928 Calcutta AICC, a faction piloted by Bose wanted to amend Congress’s political creed from achievement of ‘Dominion Status’ to ‘complete Independence’. But Gandhiites played a game of emotional blackmailing, saying that if AICC were to vote in favour of an amendment it would imply lack of faith in him and he would retire from the Congress. The amendment was defeated by 973 to 1350 votes.

The Congress actually changed its creed to ‘complete Independence’ or ‘Purna Swaraj’ at Lahore AICC in December 1929. It was only when Gandhi realised that turning the clock back would not be permanent, and sweeping forces inside Congress might get the better of the ‘faith in him’. India’s grand old party, which claims to be sole legatee of freedom movement, demanded complete Independence as late as in 1929. Revolutionaries like Aurobindo, Savarkar, Madan Lal Dingra, Rash Behari Bose were arguing and acting in favour of this goal since long. But, sadly, their names are hardly mentioned on the margins of freedom struggle.

After Independence, for which the Congress leadership obsequiously accepted the term ‘Transfer of Power’, names of such pioneers of our freedom struggle were relegated to sidelines. An impression was assiduously created that it was Gandhi and his political charioteer Nehru alone who brought us independence. Not unreasonably, India’s foremost historian Ramesh Chandra Mazumdar, invited by Ministry of I&B to write a official history of India’s Freedom Movement, soon resigned, for he could not conform to ‘official position’ like showering encomia upon Aurengzeb or making the history of freedom movement a chronicle of Gandhi-Nehru camp.

The year I929 was also when India’s freedom movement was getting the better of Gandhi. In 1928, Lala Lajpat Rai, who had an illustrious past in pre-Gandhian Congress, but like other Arya Samajists had become a Gandhian, succumbed to injuries from lathi charge at a Anti-Simon Commission rally in Lahore. The Bhagat Singh troika, in order to avenge Lalaji’s death, shot down the guilty police officer Saunders in broad daylight. Bhagat Singh escaped from Lahore and resurfaced on April 8, 1929, with Batukeshwar Dutt at Delhi’s Central Legislative Assembly, hurling two crude bombs and bundles of propaganda pamphlets.Within days of Bhagat Singh’s arrest, police unearthed a house in Lahore used as a bomb making workshop. It followed a string of arrests like Sukhdev, Hansraj and Jaigopal; and further Shiv Verma, Rajguru, Vijay Singh and finally Jatin Das from Calcutta. This sensational event became popular as the Lahore Conspiracy Case that ultimately led to the execution of Bhagat Singh-Rajguru-Sukhdev on March 23, 1931.Gandhi had been criticised for not securing, nay not even trying to secure, the release of Bhagat Singh trio as part of Gandhi-Irwin Pact of Delhi, of March 5, 1931, which led to the release of many political prisoners.

…But a year and half before Bhagat Singh trio, Lahore Conspiracy Case, claimed another victim viz Jatin Das. He laid down his life in a Lahore prison in Gandhian fashion. But Gandhi’s attitude towards him was more cold and intriguing. Subhas Bose, who admired Jatin Das wrote, “Jatin Das was twenty-five at the time of his death. While a student he had joined the Non-Cooperation Movement in 1921 and had spent several years in prison. At the time of the Calcutta Congress in 1928 and after, he had taken a leading part in organising and training volunteers…” (pp 179-80). Whether at Cellular Jail (where Savarkar stayed) or Mandalay (where Bose was incarcerated) British jailers treated extremist political prisoners as harshly as any murderer or robber. In June, arrestees of Lahore Conspiracy Case decided to go on hunger strike to protest against atrocities. Though Jatin Das did not initiate that hunger strike, nonetheless he stopped them from deserting. The hunger strike aroused intense agitation in the country, but little softened the heart of the British authorities.

Bose chronicled subsequently, “As the days rolled by, one by one the hunger-strikers dropped off, but young Jatin was invincible. He never hesitated, never faltered for one small second but marched straight on towards death and freedom. Every heart in the country melted but the heart of the bureaucracy did not. So Jatin died on September 13th. But he died a martyr’s death. After his supreme sacrifice, the whole country gave him an ovation which few men in our recent history have received. As his body was removed from Lahore to Calcutta for cremation, people assembled in their thousands and tens of thousands at every station to pay their homage” (p 179).

But what was the reaction of Gandhi, the champion of fasts unto death? It was a classic case of darkness below the lamp. Bose wrote, “In this connection, the attitude of the Mahatma was inexplicable. Evidently, the martyrdom of Jatin Das, which had stirred the heart of the country, did not make any impression on him. The pages of Young India ordinarily filled with observations on all political events and also on topics like health, diet, etc., had nothing to say about the incident. A follower of Mahatma, who was also a close friend of the deceased, wrote to him inquiring as to why he had said nothing about the event. The Mahatma replied to the effect that he had purposely refrained from commenting, because if he had done so, he would have been forced to write something unfavourable”

From Wikipedia (emphasis added):

The memorable hunger strike started on 13 July 1929 and lasted 63 days [2]. The jail authority took many measures to forcibly feed Jatin Das and the other freedom fighters, beat them and did not even provide them with drinking water.[3] However, Jatindra did not eat. He died, hunger strike unbroken, on 13 September.[4] As his body was carried from Lahore to Kolkata by train, thousands of people rushed to every station to pay their homage to the martyr. A two-mile long procession in Kolkata carried the coffin to the cremation ground.[5]

Related: Pl read the posts under “National Heroes” and please take a moment to share this with your friends and family.

B Shantanu

Political Activist, Blogger, Advisor to start-ups, Seed investor. One time VC and ex-Diplomat. Failed mushroom farmer; ex Radio Jockey. Currently involved in Reclaiming India - One Step at a Time.

You may also like...

8 Responses

  1. JC Moola says:

    Why only breaking fasts when the fear of the Lathi of British Constable coming down with full might was imminent, he curiously fell ill in jails to come out with commuted sentences. Did he have pact of not being sent to cellular jail and drag like bull to produce oil for living is although unknown? Does anyone know why was he not sent to cellular jail?

  2. seadog4227 says:

    Fast unto death is mentioned in the Ramayana and Vir Savarkar gave up his life in this manner.It is called “prayopveshan”.
    MKG doesn’t deserve a mention here.

  3. K P Ganesh says:

    Thanks for posting this insightful piece of history. India needs a near complete re-writing of it’s history which has been hijacked by the socialistic and secular (pseudo-secular) views encouraged by Nehru along with his leftists, which got escalated when Indira Gandhi came to power. Wonder how long these left ideologues will keep cheating Indians by propagating almost every Hindu freedom fighter as extremists for the sake of minority appeasement, thanks to grants from various Western foundations.

  4. harpreet singh says:

    Darshan singh ferumaan also attained death /martyrdom fasting unto death .though that was in independent india

  5. Naresh says:

    Gandhi was an imposter and a total farce. He and Nehru has done the greatest harm to the country. Their legacy is still haunting us today. The British used pegs like Gandhi and Nehru to loot India and leave it in perpetual chaos. It was Gandhi who decided that India should be secular when the counterpart (pakistan) declared itself a muslim republic. Gandhi’s last fast was also to protect pakistan’s interest of getting 55crores from the Indian government.

    Last and not the least, there were only 2 people who didn’t vote for Sardar Patel to be the prime minister of free India. Guess who, Gandhi and Nehru!

  6. Prahaar says:

    Namaskar Shantanuji,
    I have listened to your exposition at least once, it was a pleasure. Coming to this particular post about Jatin Das’s Aaamaran Uposhan, genuine sacrifices are not recognized by the current dispensation in Bharat.

    There is a great value of conducting Upvaas in our(read Bharatiya) sanskriti, that is a reason a person speaking something when on “Fast” carries more credibility for the masses (not for De-Racinated RNI as well as NRIs). For many RNIs and NRIs it is a “diet” that many wish to do but are unable to ;-). Getting more serious, NM in Gujarat has also taken up a 3 day Anshan to promote Sadbhav between all Bharatiys (a rare effort for injecting an Anti-Dote against identity politics that has come to define Indian polity under the stalwart leadership of INC to a large extent and other splinter-INCs JD;SP;DMK;MNS;JMM; just naming a few).

    If this brand of Non-Identity based politics grows, it will more or less the wash away the parochial A vs B politics that INC learnt well with British patronage.

    The only method people will give up voting on identity based lines in presence of enough resources to be shared with ALL (irrespective of the section). So IMHO, governance based politics can win only if the governance delivers more tangible results than what is obtained in identity based politics.

    NM has successfully delivered that in Gujarat and so he can propose this model. Do you think this model can work at Pan-India level? If you look at the live telecast of Sadbhavana Mission, people from all parts of Bharat are visiting to demonstrate support (sort of unofficial primaries of BJP for PM candidate).

    Could you share your thoughts about the Fast-ism (not Fascism) and NaMo phenomena?

    Thanks for your time and all the best to your endeavor.

    Bharat Mata ki Jai! Jai Hind!

  7. Nanda says:

    Balbir Punj says “Jatin Das alone walked till the end of path”, but the recent one we all know but forgot so soon is Swami Nigamananda who died from fasting to save Ganges.