Bahadur Shah Zafar & “Bharat Ratna” - more than a joke
Amidst all the recent brouhaha around Bharat Ratna nominations, someone conveniently forgot the “truth” about some of our nominees. I am thinking of Bahadur Shah Zafar who was proposed for the award as a champion of India’s freedom and someone who actively opposed the British.
The demand was made by Delhi Assembly Deputy Speaker Shoaib Iqbal…(who reportedly said that)… it was unfortunate that Emperor Bahadur Shah II, also known as Zafar, whose martyrdom and national stature rank among the highest in India’s freedom struggle, had not so far been conferred with the Bharat Ratna.
”Bahadur Shah Zafar was the leader of the freedom fighters of the entire sub-continent. He could have compromised with the British and lived a life like the royal family of England but chose to sacrifice his sons, pomp and grandeur - all for for the sake of the honour and independence of India and its people,”
The facts are somewhat different (and inconvenient).
The reality was that the Emperor did not think much of the Sepoys who had marched to Delhi to ask him to be their leader. He viewed them as “rustic, uncouth and ill-mannered”.
His support (for the revolt), when it came…was far from being decisive…”He vacillated, but overcome by the desire to reclaim his inheritance, he assented” (from “Requiem for Mughal Delhi” by By Muneeza Shamsie, a review of William Dalrymple’s book “The Last Mughal”).
And yet, “
…he was never quite in control. His page, Zahir Dehlavi, who later wrote an invaluable memoir, Dastan-e-Ghadr, described Bahadur Shah’s horror when he learnt the sepoys wanted to slaughter the British families held prisoner in the fort. He pleaded with them.
He asked the sepoys, Hindus and Muslims, to consult their religious leaders if they had the authority to massacre helpless women and children. “Their murder can never be allowed,” he added. But in the end, he failed to prevent it.” (from Muneeza Shamsie’s review)
So much for leading the freedom fighters.
The end of his leadership was also far from heroic: “When the victory of the British became certain, Zafar took refuge at Humayun’s Tomb, in an area that was then at the outskirts of Delhi, and hid there. British forces led by Major Hodson surrounded the tomb and compelled his surrender.”
Will the Honorary Dy Speaker admit that he may have been mistaken?
For some extra “fun”, read this leftist interpretation of Zafar’s life from an article written for CPI(M)’s newspaper last June. I thought this bit was the funniest:
“One should not take too literally Zafar’s statement at his so-called ‘trial’ in which he projected himself as a mere prisoner of the sipahis.”
Classic!
Related Post: Lies and half-truths in the name of national integration
.
Well said Shantanuji,
This is exactly how the Secularists shroud the history of India under the Moghul occupation with complete mis-information, deceit and lies in order to justify and glorify things / occurances which were not.
The GOI under Nehru had a very significant role to play to implement a “secularist” constitution, revamp the whole education system with a very strong and damaging Marxist / Communist flavor in order to brain wash the post independence generation of Indians.
The true meaning of secularism was “Indianized” by them.
Comment by Vijay | February 24, 2008
Everyone should read the “The Last Mughal”. It is a compelling read about the last days of the Mughal Dynasty and the sepoys’ fight for Delhi (It only deals with the Delhi part of the 1857 War for independence).
How many people in India know that the Red Fort Complex had many beautiful palaces and gardens ….. and that the British razed them all to the ground after winning the battle of Delhi …. and then made it into an army cantonment …… and the government of Free India still continues this practice of using the historic Red Fort Complex as an army cantonment.
And yes, poor, old, indecisive Bahadur Shah Jaffar was not just the reluctant head of the sepoys, but a coerced one.
And, the 1857 war was partially a religious war for the Sepoys who came to Delhi from the Gangetic plains, especially for the Muslim sepoys. It was the first Jihad on the subcontinent!
Comment by Patriot | February 24, 2008
The last mughal emperor Bahadur Shah Zafar,no matter holds his own kind of importance in Indian History but not at all he deserve a BHARAT RATNA award.
I mean in what sense it is decided. He was the king who was a coward .It was during his reign that Britishers gain the power as much as that they even get the hold on Indian politics. He was not a great rulers like his ancestors were.His ancestors never allowed the foreigners to gain powers. So in what way Bahadur Shah deserve The most respected award.
Yes he was a deserving candidate for the award if he on the first attempt by the Britishers would have fought against them and would have lost his life during battle.
ASHU
________
add posting
Comment by ASHU | July 5, 2008