In which Sanjeev takes on Narayana Murthy..
A thought-provoking extract from a post on FTI colleague Sanjeev’s blog:
I don’t know how this man Narayana Murthy gets the audacity to lecture to others about doing something.
For nine years now I have been trying to get him (or Nandan Nilikani) interested in CITIZENSHIP – namely, in the process of active participation in the affairs of their nation. Numerous email communications I’ve had with both of them ..I even met both of them. They pretend to be “supportive” of the ideas I advocate but then do nothing.
One of them even asked me to consider joining an existing party to which I responded that I have something valuable: self-respect. Something they don’t seem to either have or understand. Their “honesty” means nothing if it doesn’t translate into self-respect.
…Unfortunately (for India and for their own reputation), they don’t seem to notice any discrepancy in LECTURING others even as they sit on the sideline as smug observers.
…During the lecture Murthy gave a few days ago he is reported to have said that the biggest malady of the country at present was the apathy to social problems. “We feel that problems surrounding us belong to somebody else. We do not take action or rather postpone the decision”.
Nicely said, Mr Murthy, but SINCE WHEN HAVE YOU DONE ANYTHING ABOUT INDIA’S PROBLEMS? Only complain endlessly (or bribe the corrupt?).
The ONLY thing I’ve seen from you in the last nine years are lectures. I’m sorry to be publicly saying this but I’ve formed the view that you are a TIGHT FISTED STINGY MAN WHO IS EITHER DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY SUPPORTING INDIA’S CORRUPT SOCIALIST PARTIES.
Why is it that you fear to build or support a political opposition that wants to fix India’s governance? Why not be a citizen instead of being a carping, stingy old man? Why is it that NOT A SINGLE PAISA has been spent by you in supporting the right cause?
Prior to you I met many Indian origin CEOs of IT companies in the Silicon Valley. Same result. TOTAL APATHY.
These are not Indians. They are BLOOD SUCKERS OF INDIA – who will exploit India for all they can but give back nothing in return. They will leave behind a WORSE INDIA than when they were born. That will be their legacy – of DO NOTHINGS.
In THIRTEEN years (fourteen in February 2012) since I’ve been fighting to establish a classical liberal political party in India not ONE so-called “honest” CEO has bothered to even inquire in some detail about how we can transform India.
And not ONE paisa spent. Not one. All hot air and mindless talk.
If you want your reputation to go down well in India’s history, please do something. Or BE QUIET, now. I’m getting a bit sick of all this.
Also read: Narayana Murthy – the most apathetic of them all (by Sanjeev)
and … On Politics, Corruption and FTI, Why bother with politics? and FTI comes of age on this blog
Dear All: Comments on this post copied over from the facebook page:
Anup Pandey Mr Murthy did not reply or supported him so he became bad man?
Shantanu Bhagwat ‎Anup: Its a bit more nuanced that that but I will let Sanjeev respond..
Anup Pandey ‎@shantanu Sir, I have read Mr Sanjeev few posts and this one as well. I feel Mr Sanjeev thinks he is not getting due advantage from Indian authority or important players . I think he is right to expect that if he is working/plan to working on some good thing for India . But we should not forget that running a business in India with Minimum corruption (can;t be zero) is a big deal .
Jaiprakash Ramani authors view seems to be targetted at soft Mr. Murthy, even ignoring his contribution to Indian economy. Without being biased , I wud appreciate if we start targeting the so called educated class of india, who unlike murthy accept everything, rather even make situation worst. One example – I see them openly flouting traffic rules everyday – isn’t it also a kind of corruption. Lets start working on low hanging fruits first rather than targetting Murthy & in the process behaving like indian politicians, who blame opposite party for everything that goes wrong.
Geetali Tare I’m not too clear about the source of Mr Sanjeev’s complaint: does he want Murthy and Nilekani to take an active role in politics? Or HE wants an active role and wants *their* support? What exactly is the man griping about?
Wait a minute. Narayana Murthy, whose company has provided thousands of jobs which go to employing the educated youth of India so that they contribute to Indian society and don’t leave for better opportunities abroad, is a blood sucker?! Infosys is I think the first Indian company to be listed on the Nasdaq. A man and company which made India synonymous with IT is a blood sucker?! Wow.
And Sanjeev who has done what?–tried to start a party for 14 years and failed is the shining example to the youth of India.
My guess is that if you have been trying something for 14 years and not succeeded, better give up and try something else.
The assumption that if you have great intentions, others should automatically support you, is naive at the very least.
About the “not one paise spent” complaint, most industrialists have their own pet charity which they contribute to. So what Sanjeev means is not one paise spent on him.
I second Harapriya. Narayan Murthy’s credentials are out there for all to see. I would rather that a man starts a business and employs thousands of people, than a charity which benefits a few. Corree me if I am wrong, Mr. Sanjeev has been tring to involve Mr Murthy and Mr Nilekani “in the process of active participation in the affairs of their nation”. Isn’t that a bit presumptuous? How can they be any more involved tha they already are? Also, Mr. Nilekani is a silent, but active patron of a number of philanthropic activities. That he chooses not to make this public is a choice which rests with him.
Mr. Sanjeev’s allegations are emotional and not very cogent. If there is a basis to the really strong statements, show us the proof.
Reproducing Sanjeev’s response below to a comment left on my fb page:
Chandrashekhar:
Guess,the writer does not know about Infosys and its contribution to Indian economy. Maybe if he was a saffron supporter the views will change accordingly
Sanjeev Sabhlok
This is not about Infosys. This is about a rich man who babbles a lot about corruption and misgovernance in India and then PUBLICLY PRAISES the HEAD of the most corrupt organisation in India. Either he should not complain (because he supports corruption) or he should STRONGLY act against MMS and Sonia Gandhi. He can’t both complain about corruption AND support corruption. See the point? If even then you don’t see the point then please go ahead and worship this hypocrite.
Thanks, Shantanu.
I’m nowhere in the league of the person I’ll shortly mention, below, but one thing I would like to make clear to my Indian brothers and sisters: I do NOT see myself as a failure, for I stand for a cause far greater than me: the LIBERTY and greatness of India. I have overcome anything that has come in the way, and am still struggling each day to push myself to the limit. To me failure means not trying. It does not mean not achieving a desired goal. I don’t care about the results. I care ONLY for trying to do the right thing.
The charge against me (above, by one commentator) is this: “Sanjeev who has done what?–tried to start a party for 14 years and failed is the shining example to the youth of India”.
I’m guilty as charged. But I want to humbly suggest that the goal I have for India is far greater than the goal set for India by ANYONE ELSE I know, a goal yet for which I’m merely one small fading light of a mud lamp in the journey.
My journey, my mud lamp may fade and burn out, but the goal I have for India WILL be met. By those determined to achieve it. Showing the goal, even if very faintly today, is my job.
And now comes an example which I know will be readily distorted by many (for people will imagine that I’m trying to compare myself to the great man whose name I will now cite), but I am offering this example NOT as proof of my “greatness” (which is totally non-existent – as the commentator above rightly pointed out) but as proof that an idea is always greater than the man.
When Ramakrishna died he had just a handful of disciples of whom Vivekananda was one. They had virtually nothing, barely surviving in a ramshackle broken house. But look at what was achieved. The RK mission is the result of the IDEA that RK represented. I’m no RK (let me repeat once again!), but I’m talking about an idea for India that needs not one but 1500 Vivekanandas.
It takes only ONE Vivekananda to set fire to the fabric of tradition and oppression and to lead to new achievement for an entire country. Imagine what 1500 Vivekanandas can achieve.
I may fail (according to your commentator’s definition), and may fail again – and again. But in the end it will take just one Vivekananda (figuratively speaking) to set the nation free.
Instead of gloating at my failure, young commentator, why don’t you taken on the work I’m trying to do – and succeed? Just to show how utterly incompetent I am. Make India free, make it prosperous, make it an honest place. Make it a place for us to be proud of.
That will be a good lesson for me about my own incompetence and inability (to succeed). You show me, young man. I’m happy to be taught by you.
S
Sanjeev: The problem here is not about who is better – you are NR, the problem here is which has always been with the citizens of Bharat..whats in it for me..because NR has Infosys to back him up which provided employment to educated youth of India, the so called educated ppl will back NR but not back you because you are fighting for a cause that wont help these ppl immediately. If only they put their individualistic thoughts aside and think about our country, that’s when we will a change, until them we just have to fight. I am with you on this and I share the same feeling about all the so called bright ppl of India.
Mr. NRN is a commie ideologue. I saw an interview recently in NDTV which was conducted by Bangalore correspondent Maya Sharma for a bunch of school girls. Mr. NRN said that one particular Indian society has been very biased to another particular section of the society for nearly 4000 years!!! It totally zapped me. And very soon I knew what Murthy was talking of. That Brahmins were biased to so called Dalits as they are known today. Well I know for sure that the very “concept” of Dalit came around during the Colonial British and is just 200-250 years old, a creation based on race and deliberate subversion of Shudra, which according to Bhagavad Gita is purely based on intellect and not on the looks or a persons works (eg. untouchables). Let me make one thing clear. The untouchables as a word, because of their slavery to colonial British came about because certain set of people were forced to clear toilets (night soil), thanks to introduction of the present day toilet facilities. Those who turned appeasers to British and still are to the Westerners today are these bunch of commies (leftists/libtards) no matter what their political lip service is (of being against West). After all huge chunk of money in the form of donations/charity to this day finds into NGO’s run by these commie ideologues who have qualms in giving lip service but also allow inculturation apart from clandestine proselytizing, but ensure that they use the “Human Rights” nonsense when they are cornered. Mr. NRN falls into this category. His Infosys foundation donates huge cash to Harvard, which is used by corrupt indologist like Witzel, Diana Eck et al.
http://sookta-sumana.blogspot.in/2011/12/academic-freedom-duplicity-at-harvard.html
Mr Hariprasad has known the person and Mr murthy gave 20 crores to Bangalore Municipal Corporation, 20 crores for toilets with a promise that he will give more and not one toilet is working. The respective IAS officers wife must have made Diamond sets out of the commission and sandalwood temples with gold enraves to decorate his new Duplex Bunglaws.
Narayan Murthy is very successful entrepreneur and very wealthy too! There is no doubt about it. He earned his wealth ethically, legally and in the process created a lot of employment. As such he can spend his money which ever way he like. Who am I to complain?
Having said that his incessant pontification is becoming a headache. I just ignore his holier than thou attitude. After he threw his hat in the ring for presidential post, he is trying even more to be in the good books of this UPA admin. He has no qualms being chummy with the Nehru Dynasty TV, or even this admin.
So, he is a good businessman alright, that does’nt mean we need to put him on a pedestal and start worshiping him. We Indians should be a little skeptical and live by adage ‘great men make great mistakes’. Unfortunately there is way too much hero worship in India.
I think all Sanjeev was trying to say in his previous article was, ‘practice what you preach’ . So if Murthy wants to sermonise the youth on honesty he needs to make sure he is free of any dishonesty in life. Seems perfectly logical to me.
People are going gaga over how Murthy started Infosys and how he has given employment to the youth. Well, yes he did all that and no one is contesting that in the first place. The thing is, you can provide employment to thousands of youth but you can still be a serial killer (just exaggerating to prove my point). So basically, your virtues don’t absolve you of your sins. And then on top of that you sermonise people on how serial killing is a bad thing to do.
To people making personal comments about the author, all I’d like to say is grow up. Guys like Sanjeev and Shantanu have already done so much for the country through their blogs than you and your family ever will (intended personal remark).
Ek hi ulloo kaafi hai baraad-e-gulistaan karne ko
Yahaan toh har shaakh pe ulloo baitha hai
anjaam-e-gulistaan kya hoga.
Murthy created cheap labour force and make them available to serve capitalists, burdened and battered by perils of journey from laissz faire capitaism to welfare capitalism.
The program writers are so cheap that not only they lack the capacity to create but think Murthy’s sweat shop is best thing to have happened to them.
Interesting commentary in these posts, knowing/having interacted with both players personally.
After the discussion on FDI in retail section, never thought I would be in agreement with Malavika on anything – but, have to agree 100% with her on this post.
Unthinking hero worship (and the attendant search for a single-shot magic cure to all our problems) is the bane of this country.
Cheers
Patriot
“After the discussion on FDI in retail section, never thought I would be in agreement with Malavika on anything..”
Patriot, why is that so? Could it be because your ideology (of Rand/Smith/Hayek) is highly intolerant of different ideas? 😉
At least you admit your shortfalls, which is positive. 😀
@Vishnu: Let’s get this right! Sanjeev can make “personal” comments on Narayana Murthy, but we shouldn’t make comments on Sanjeev. Wow. Talk about double standards. As one of the few peole who has actually read Sanjeev’s boring book where he tells us for the nth time what we already know, that Nehruvian socialism is defunct, I think I do have the right to call it as I see it.
@Patriot. It is extremely patronizing to call all those who like Murthy as unthinking. Most people do recognize his flaws, yet overlook them because what he has achieved is phenomenal. It is the same reason people admire Gandhi although he slept with his nieces to test his commitment to celibacy.
@Sanjeev. Sir, I do not consider you a failure. I don’t consider anyone a failure, especially if they are happy with their lives. You seem to be happy pursuing your dream. Good for you.
However, as an objective person, let me point out why you might get a negative reception from people. Whether you intend it or not, in your articulation of your dream and goal, you come across as extremely bombastic.
“I humbly suggest that the goal I have set for India is far greater than the goal put forth by anyone I know”??! That doesn’t really sound humble.
As an individual who lived abroad for decades and decided to come back to India to see if I could actually contribute, I find that indeed many of the assumptions I had about India are false. Yes there is corruption, yes the judicial system is lethargic, yes the cities are mainly a garbage dump. Yet in it, I see a vibrancy.
Just yesterday, the Supreme court cancelled the 122 licences of companies which were benefitted from the 2G scam. We should all be proud that the system works.
India is prosperous and free. We do need to make it corruption free. We can do that too, but perhaps we need to follow in the path of Subramaniam Swamy rather than in the path of Anna Hazare.
Hi Sanjeev,
As clear from your writing, all your statements are of ZERO VALUE and they are made of BASELESS FACTS about MrNarayana Murthy.
I work in Infosys and from what I know, will try to answer your question- “icely said, Mr Murthy, but SINCE WHEN HAVE YOU DONE ANYTHING ABOUT INDIA’S PROBLEMS?”
Let me classify the problems a nation like India is facing, and the contribution of Narayana Murthy and the company founded by him:
1) Social problems:
a) Infosys Foundation: have taken care of thousands of genuine cases in the society in need of realy help in field of education, healthcare, financial help.
b) Akshaya Patra: a mid day meal program funded by Infy employees for thousands of school kids across the country.
2) Jobs in society:
a) Company which was started by murthy currently employs nearly 1.5 lakh indians, and it is second largest IT exported in India, first Indian company to be listed in NYSE.
3) Scientific progress in India:
a) Started Infosys Science Foundation which awards Infosys prize (Rs50 lakh for all winners in various fields every year), is like Nobel prize inside India (highest valued award in India)
After taking India into global IT economic map, murthy retired with honor after leading Infy for 30 long years!
With all your failed attempts to just start a political party, how can u even comment badly on a person like mr. murthy who could even be the next President of India ?
Perhaps on the issue of corruption, a more nuanced discussion is possible. Maybe we just need to tweek the system, not overhaul it entirely.
One of the areas which lead to massive corruption is elections. During the last election in Tamil nadu, freebies were announced by both parties. These would of course be provided at tax payers expense. So who is at fault here? The candidate who has to promise free things to get elected, or the public who accept such goodies and vote? Or perhaps the educated elite who did not protest? or the election commission which allowed such promises. The reason politicians are corrupt is that many spend out of their own pockets to stand for elections and if they are voted, spend their entire first term recovering financially. A simple solution is the public funding of elections and eliminating the capacity of candidates to promise free stuff–i.e. if they do, they have to step down.
Another area which has plenty of illegal money is real estate. The problem is fairly simple at least in Tamil Nadu. The government valuation of property is often much, much less than the market value. thus people take the government valuation for the stamp duty and take that amount in cheque and remaining in cash which they don’t account. The solution is really simple–raise market valuation to reflect average market value in that area. If people have to pay taxes on market value irrespective of whether they took it as cash or cheque, they would be more inclined to taking it as a cheque i.e. white money.
The problem of corruption may not be a monolithic one and the solutions have to be on a case by case basis.
@ Kaffir
Well, given the nature of discussion on FDI with Malavika, I built a particular image – that is usually the fallacy of trying to extrapolate based on limited data points. Happy to correct the image, when more data points emerge. In this, my particular hero is Hercule Poirot, whose philosophy was to ensure that the working hypothesis fit all data points, rather than the other way around!
I have not read much Rand and Smith, except their seminal works. But, I have read more of Hayek and continue to do so, along with Von Mises. Their clarity of thought and logic is astonishing. And, if you are a true Hayekian, you can never be intolerant of competing ideas, even if you may not agree with them. Maybe, you should consider shedding your distrust a bit, as well?
@ Harapriya
Sorry, the intent was not to tar everybody with the same brush. But, there is a lot of unthinking hero worship that goes on.
I admire Murthy, Nilekani, Kris, Shibulal & co a lot – they have built something which is truly world class and amazing. The essence of Infosys is that they took a linear, non-scalable business and converted it into a partially non-linear, immensely scalable business. In terms of creativity, I would rank the company along side the likes of Apple, because what they achieved has only been achieved by a handful of companies, globally. And, none of the other global companies have the same return and cash flow ratios as Infosys.
But, Murthy probably does not truly understand what ails India. And, if he does, he does not have the nerve to take corrective action or the hard path to remedial action. Worse, he says things like MMS is a good person, which is contrary to virtually everything that we can *see* today. MMS is personally implicated, at the very least, of sacrificing integrity and honesty for the sake of his UPA government continuing to be in power.
So, what gives? Why does Murthy act in this manner? And, when he does so, outside the umbrella of Infosys, why should he be shielded from criticism?
Cheers
Patriot
Manjunath SL:
a) is something which might not done by infosys out of love but because of welfare capitalism so they are accepted in USA/ Europe. Akshaya Patra runs around in country selling goods/ taking donations so it can make profits.
b) Infosys/ Murthy employs 1.5 lakhs cheap indians. Infosys / murthy does not export technology. All it can do is write programs cheaply. Infosys workforce lives in hole in UK/ US to save dollars/ pounds, compromising on standards of ethics, health and hygiene of Europe/ US.
c) is self exaggerated infosician claim.
Mr.Murthy may have some ‘issues’.
But Sanjeev is a die hard ‘Macaulay’ Bhakta.
What to tell of his ‘lecture’
Likes of Narayana Murthy are not representatitve of India. To Solicit his support is perfectly legetimate, but to say he would be obliged to support a form of political discourse is wrong.
Aslo I take exceptions to the reference that socalist parties are corrupt – this is like saying a political discourse to which FTI is opposed doesnot becoem corrupt.
Further the author even if had an iota of understanding of India, would agree with me that the society itself is corrupt. Further corrupt are in all political parties and they are a mere representation of what we see in the society!
To put plainly everything on the free markets theory to help develop a strong economic to have a potential positive impact on the society is equally a philosophy with plenty of assumptions such as the others prevaling around.
The need of the hour is not about creating a new political party, but to get critical mass of people with good intent to get elected to legislatures/Parliament to help redefine the delivery aspect of governance. The rest will follow….
FTI and the author talks of creating a new political discourse where there is no scope for disagreement, means they dont want to be inclusive to build a new Indian political discourse!
Also the attempt is though well intentioned, it is like a small child who even struggles to walk to ask him/her to run a marathon!
Time to re-think the strategy!
@K. Harapriya,
“Another area which has plenty of illegal money is real estate. The problem is fairly simple at least in Tamil Nadu. The government valuation of property is often much, much less than the market value. thus people take the government valuation for the stamp duty and take that amount in cheque and remaining in cash which they don’t account. The solution is really simple–raise market valuation to reflect average market value in that area. If people have to pay taxes on market value irrespective of whether they took it as cash or cheque, they would be more inclined to taking it as a cheque i.e. white money.”
Actually, stamp duty for land in AP is fixed by the govt of AP based on the location and not on the price. Recently, I sold some plots in which the the actual price received is mentioned in the registration papers and it had no relation to the stamp duty.
As it is my dad, an advocate gets several cases from middle/lower middle class folks who earned a honest days labor abd bought plot but unable to register because of high stamp duty and which caused lot of trouble later. I think stamp duty must be reduced, as the govt does not provide any services like proper roads or even drainages.
So called Hi tech city, and near by areas do not even have a proper drainage. And the cost of an independent house in a gated community there is as much as that of Silicon Valley’s affluent neighbourhood’s like Cupertino with its excellent schools(free), libraries and parks. Some contrast!
@ Ashwin,
Yes, FTI is intolerant of socialism or communism – there is plenty of evidence to show that socialism and communism, whether in the developed world or the developing world has led to bad outcomes for the citizens of the respective nations.
So, a different approach and ideology is certainly needed. This ideology’s fundamental premise is that each individual knows what is good for him and his family. The individuals create a state to ensure that they have a safe environment to work in. That’s it – after that the state gets out of the way. What is not inclusive about this ideology?
And, have you been following all the corruption trials lately? Are not ALL the socialist parties in the dock?
And, to try to shift the blame to “society” is terrible – each individual acts of his own right and responsibility. So, to say I took bribes, because the “society” is corrupt is infantile. And, not FTI, which opposes such illogical thought processes.
Cheers
@ Patriot
There are ample evidences that the so called practioners of free market political discourse have also stooped in corruption if one calls it lobbyign or corruption it does not matter. What really does is how policies have an impact on the development of the people! In country like India we are not yet ready to get the free markets theory. The great practioners of the philosophy to an extent being US – see the disparity in the wealth of the people! A country with a population and society as diverese as India wowudl find it difficult to implement the free market theory in its full version!
As for the society beign corrutp – i dont think there is anythign wrong in what i am saying – if you look at all walks and spheres of life on how corruption as deep rooted – to say socalist parties are the root cause or socalist politicians are the cause is a flawed theory and far from real ground situation.
As a political discourse FTI has all the freedom to pursue what it feels like, but India needs a pan India political party which is inclusive for the desired an dcherished goal of us all to be achevived!
@ Ashwin,
You say:
“There are ample evidences that the so called practioners of free market political discourse have also stooped in corruption if one calls it lobbyign or corruption it does not matter. ”
Where is the free market? Is not the 2G scam a great example of what the discretionary powers of ministers and politicians create? They are the monsters of socialism.
If companies then have to feed this monster to survive and prosper, then they are the lesser party in the transaction, are they not? Although I am not absolving them of guilt, either, since there are a few examples of companies that have held on to their integrity in the cesspool that is Socialist India.
And, Ashwin, I don’t know if you are being deliberately obtuse by saying society is corrupt. Is a child born corrupt or immoral? Our society is merely a reflection of the perversity of socialism – if the state tries to control production, then you end up paying bribes for getting a telephone line. Whose fault is that? Who has created the distorted incentives in our society?
And, yet again, you float this strawman – that FTI is not inclusive and now, not pan-India. We have members from Assam to Tamil Nadu, from Punjab to Bengal. And, we are not inclusive? Not pan-India? Time to put up or shut up, Ashwin.
Cheers
@Malavika: My point was that government valuation of property, called the guideline value in TN, reflect market realities to avoid the problem of black money–i.e. unaccounted money. Yes, the guideline value of the government in suburban areas are based on location and other factors. However, location alone doesn’t impact market value. Demand for the particular location does. If government valuation equalled or at least approximated market value, most of the transaction would be in “white” money. Yes, stamp duty, which is a percentage of government value (in TN it is 8% plus 1% registration fee) will increase.
The argument that stamp duty should be reduced because the government doesn’t provide any amenities is specious at best. The tax is on the current market value of land. Since the people are acquiring the land, they have to pay the tax. It is similar to a sales tax–if you buy a car, you pay a tax as a percentage of the car’s market value.
If would be better to argue that we should not pay road taxes, water taxes etc. because we don’t get those amenities.
@Malavika: The above should read “The tax is on the current market value, as judged by the government or what is called the guideline value.”
@K .Harapriya,
There is a fundamental disagreement here and we have to agree to disagree.
I strongly think every citizen should know his/her tax payer money is being spent.
Taxes have historically been paid to the govt(unless colonized) to provide services like roads, law and order, protect borders, provide education(at least primary) and also welfare for its citizens.. Municipal taxes are paid for providing municipal services. And that is how it works in established democracies.
Sanjeev did not mean this and that….alright…read the words he has used…Blood suckers of India…they will leave behind the worse India…giving nothing back to India. How sure one can be that Sanjeev, will leave India in good shape? Is he a magician?
@Shantanu….we only have faith in you…no one else.
Discussion on Sanjeev Sabhlok’s blog of the same topic-
http://sabhlokcity.com/2012/02/the-world-is-not-black-and-white-im-told-by-those-who-prefer-distortions-of-the-truth/
Job Creator or “Slave” creator. The White man needed the Educated Indian to do his administrative work and created ICS and Clerks through Macualay. The White man again needed Educated Indian when his machines got automated and how does he support automation- hire the best brains in the world to work for him. “Throw peanuts and you get monkeys. Throw dollars and you get Indians and Chinese”. This was his strategy and he transferred wealth and lifestyle. One whole generation shifted to it, cut their moustaches, changed their names, their accents, the way of dressing and loved free travels abroad and of course green card and citizenship. In the 50’s, one had to marry local girls to get green cards. Now there is no need.
So what has this resulted in- 25 lakh IT jobs and say around 6, no let us take the worst case, 10 times dependent economy on it – 2.5 crores. what is India’s population -120 crores. What did these great IT Guys do for India’s problems- Our roads are dirty, we still do not have adequate power, our crops are dependent on genetically modified seeds from monsanto, our children speak only stupid english. The current generation’s knowledge of history doesnt go beyond the gandhi family. Worst is their lack of basic knowledge of Economics.
In all capitalist countries today, gaps between have’s and have’nots has increased tremendously and so is it in Indis today. No youngster today wants to work in any other field except IT, Banking or Retail. So all other sectors get no workers at all. So we start importing everything from where.
1) Electronics- China, Korea, Japan
2) From Toys to spare parts- China
3) Healthcare- Licensed from USA
Where is an indian company in any of the retail facing fields. Who caused this and why are we so proud of owning a LG or a Samsung HD TV or a Nokia phone or a Hyundai car. The more the wealth, the more the consumption of devices. India’s stupid politicians limited population growth in only one RELIGION. Stupid Idiots. Today, the country with most population is the winner and they never realized it.
These same IT people love a government which wants to kill the federal structure of India by making states worthless. Hence it has NREGA, the food act now, the riot act. USA is collapsing because it did the same thing- public debt and here we are ready to dole out more subsidies to the poor(where are they?)So there is no more need
for mass leaders in states. and because of the vote bank they have, they will perennially rule.
All Countries in World are sunsetting Nuclear Plants but in India, we have a PM who threatens states if they are not set up and who vowed to resign if the nuclear bill wasnt passed. Where were these captains of INDUSTRY then? Why didnt they raise a voice then?
All are same, be it NRN or anyone else. They are capitalists and hence he stopped the National Anthem because the “Phoren” guest will not understand it. His words:
Hear it from the host of the show.
“Indeed we had arranged for five people to sing the anthem. But then we cancelled it as we have foreigners on-board here. They should not be embarrassed while we sing the anthem.â€
—– NOW DOES THAT SOUND FAMILIAR.. YES, THATS WHAT OUR EDUCATED INDIANS DID UNDER THE BRITISH. WORE THEIR HATS AND KILLED OUR CULTURE. Why doesnt any educated Indian ever think how a couple of Foreigners could rule India for 300 + 60 Yrs now? It was only because our Educated Indians- all bred in London and all Lawyers wanted them to rule us. Didnt Gandhi Say in Africa and in India that “As Subjects of the British Empire, we should do our duty and help them in War”. Unfortunately, people dont know gandhi beyond the Movie.
As long as our educated people live in this carefully Brainwashed Glut, Sanjeev or Shantanu will remain restless. Kudos Sanjeev and i fully support your view on NRN.
I symphasise with Sanjeev’s gripe about Murthy but I equally have gripes about where he stands. Murthy as with many of India’s industrialist belong to the Congress/Gandhi idealogists which however discomforting it is with anyone with self respect is a long standing fact. Murthy does not have the luxury Sanjeev has of standing aside: his company and his employees would have to pay a heavy price to even to appear to stand in opposition to the Congress Party. Sanjeev is so resolutely against all of the political processes in India, it is hard to see what he really stands for. As he only finds comfort only in the liberalism of the West where he is based, he should earn his credentials in the West and demonstrate his capacity for leadership there by example. I see Sanjeev’s predicament very well because it resembles my own or any other Indian who has any capacity to lead. The only opposition party in India in the BJP has all the faults of any Indian party. It is equally despotic. Perhaps somebody could persuade me otherwise, the problem has its roots in the pysche and religion of Hinduism. The mantras of Hinduism stands in place of action. Sanjeev, unless you stand for revolution and overtuning of the old order, you are making the same mistake as any Hindu of hoping that your mantras will achieve your desired ends. Murty diagnosed rightly when he said you should join a party: in typical Hindu fashion you have fashioned a party of one but you little know it yourself. I know what I have said is the harsh reality for any Hindu (including myself) who does not want to be duped. I am not far from concluding that Hinduism and Hindus are beyond saving.
“In all capitalist countries today, gaps between have’s and have’nots has increased tremendously and so is it in Indis today.”
Mahesh, I don’t care about the gap increasing – that seems to be the wrong way to look at it. What matters is whether the standard of living/wage etc. for have-not’s has gone down when compared to 5-10-20 years ago. If you can show this to be true, then it is a cause for concern. But, if the level of both have’s and have-not’s has gone up, the gap between them is irrelevant.
Besides, one would look at the reasons why this gap has increased, instead of simply implying that somehow, it’s the fault of have’s, or that the have-not’s are being exploited.
Hi Kaffir,
Dont blame you for saying that my post was implying things.The media doesnt allow such news to come out. Take a look at this one sample URL,
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/08/22/us-usa-poverty-foodstamps-idUSTRE77L45Z20110822
to understand where 15% of USA’s population stands today. 46 mn USA people survive on food stamps today.
Mahesh
@Mahesh,
“In all capitalist countries today, gaps between have’s and have’nots has increased tremendously and so is it in Indis today. No youngster today wants to work in any other field except IT, Banking or Retail. So all other sectors get no workers at all. So we start importing everything from where.”
A small correction. Income disparities have become worse and the workers share of GDP(at least in US) has decreased since 70’s in Anglo Saxon countries. But not in Germany, Japan, South Korea. These countries retained their manufacturing base. Good for them.
I don’t blame the IT workers, if the other sectors provide decent income, other sectors would be flooded with aspirants too.
Sanjeev must have some basis for what he says and he has explained that.
Now Indian journalists have claimed that some of their stories on Infosys whistleblower retaliation were silenced by editors due to intereference by Infosys. Meddling with media is corruption , is that or it is not ? Also how do you explain NDTV position on this, almost supporting breaking the laws of another country ??
Source is http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/tennant/dear-indian-press-stop-butchering-the-facts-in-palmer-case/?cs=50772
*** COMMENT EDITED ***
“One of them even asked me to consider joining an existing party to which I responded that I have something valuable: self-respect. Something they don’t seem to either have or understand. Their “honesty†means nothing if it doesn’t translate into self-respect.”
that NRN is a commie turned ‘house-brownie’ is a well known fact. But this guy Sanjeev is no better. He is a well known apologist for *** genocider Macaulay and his ilk.
“I see Sanjeev’s predicament very well because it resembles my own or any other Indian who has any capacity to lead. The only opposition party in India in the BJP has all the faults of any Indian party. It is equally despotic. Perhaps somebody could persuade me otherwise, the problem has its roots in the pysche and religion of Hinduism. The mantras of Hinduism stands in place of action. Sanjeev, unless you stand for revolution and overtuning of the old order, you are making the same mistake as any Hindu of hoping that your mantras will achieve your desired ends. Murty diagnosed rightly when he said you should join a party: in typical Hindu fashion you have fashioned a party of one but you little know it yourself. I know what I have said is the harsh reality for any Hindu (including myself) who does not want to be duped. I am not far from concluding that Hinduism and Hindus are beyond saving.”
@khandu
there you go, another example of commie, who likes to blame every sort of ill on ‘Hinduism’. Pathetic!