Communal Reservations via the back door?

How many of you noticed this piece of “news” from about 2 months ago (emphasis added)?

The Centre is proposing to introduce reservation for Muslims in educational institutions and employment on the lines of Andhra Pradesh government, Union Minister for Law and Justice Salman Khursheed indicated in Hyderabad on Sunday.

Talking to reporters here after participating in a ‘Solidarity Meeting on Palestine’ organised by the Indo-Arab League here, he said: “I don’t know whether it is a Bill. There will be separate reservation. It is not necessary to have another Bill. It may be done through a government notification. We are having it examined.

Now, this was not really shocking – nor entirely unexpected. In fact, once Justice Mishra had declared that “..the minorities– especially the Muslims…should be regarded as backward, I’d feared that this was only a matter of time. With the elections in UP round the corner, the time appears to be now. Unfortunately this announcement did not get much attention from an otherwise hyperactive media – although I am sure at least some will act surprised when the next step follows (either a Bill or a government notification).

I’m trying hard not to get despondent about this – and not to read too much into it. But most people of my age (and older) know, that these things are almost always the thin end of the wedge – and any reservation – once introduced – would be extremely hard – if not impossible, to remove.  But the silence on this issue perplexes me. Are we really so naive that we are unaware of the damage this can cause? or gone beyond the point where we care?

And what about our so-called “leaders”? Does anyone really believe that poverty comes in quotas? It does not. Don’t our politicians get it? Of course, they do. But while poverty may not come in quotas, votes do. And that is the reason why this pernicious move may yet come to pass…And what about the saner voices among Muslims?

Why don’t we have more voices like Maulana Kalbe Sadiq (Vice President, All-India Muslim Personal Law Board):

‘‘Koi bhi qaum baisakhion ke sahare hamesha nahin chal sakti…usme jaan paida karni hogi*..” (No community can move forward on crutches…we need to instil life into it).

Actually it is obvious to see why. Because once the community realises how they have been made pawns in the great game that is Indian politics, their so-called “leaders” will find it hard to find a place to hide. As I wrote on the blog, almost five years ago, this move is..

…a sham pretending to be a welfare measure.
If the government is really concerned about socio-economic development of Muslims in India in general, they would a] emphasise the need for reform within the community b] focus on improving the lot of women c] implement uniform civil code and d] closely examine the funding of madrasas and their curriculum.

But none of these measures are likely to garner any votes; in fact, they are likely to provoke outrage – not least amongst sections of the “secular intelligentsia”. Thankfully, saner voices do exist. And they give me hope. I stumbled upon one such voice earlier today. His name is Tanvir Salim.  In a post a few days on his blog, he wrote (emphasis added):

One important factor of the educational backwardness of Muslims in India is the system of the Madrasa education prevalent in the Muslim community. The Madrasa education has its own advantages and disadvantages. Most of the students of socially, economically and educationally backward sections of the community begin their education from these Madrasas and Maktabs. At these places the education is relatively cheap and often the books are also arranged free of the cost.

…It is sad that these Madrasa people do not follow the message of Islam, which clearly states that one can go to China for seeking knowledge. They tend to stay local and avoid peeping to the outside world for knowledge. It is unfortunate that they limit the scope of learning and acquiring knowledge only to the religious education and that is why their knowledge about Science, Art, Engineering, Business, and Administration and even of humanities is generally poor.

The need of the hour is to reform the Madrasa education to the extent it is possible. But the strong network of sectarian Ulemas will not allow major reform in the setup.

Unfortunately such voices are few and far between. And they rarely get heard.  And if you think I am exaggerating the danger and the threat, read this (from Oct ’09; emphasis added):

The Centre will ask public and private sector companies to do a religion-based headcount of their employees as part of an effort to end discrimination.

The companies will be requested to prepare a database that will have all details of their staff, including religion and caste, minority affairs ministry sources said.

…“We are going to make it mandatory for all corporate houses to maintain a database of their staff. This would give the government…a clear idea about the social and religious diversity among the workforce.”

Regardless, the move now looks imminent:

The minority affairs ministry has now suggested a separate 6% quota for Muslims by designating the entire community as “backward”. In a separate move, the ministry has circulated a summary of its proposal for Muslim reservation to 25 states and 20 ministries for comments. [source]

And so the process of slowly dividing India continues – one step at a time.

P.S. Below are a few sobering lines from Sardar Patel – from 64 years ago, regarding reservation for religious minorities:

Later, however, this proposal was considered more thoroughly by the Constituent Assembly’s Advisory Committee on Fundamental Rights and Minorities, and Tribal and Excluded Areas headed by Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel.

This Advisory Committee consisted of a galaxy of great leaders of the freedom movement including Dr B.R. Ambedkar, Dr S.P. Mookerjee, Maulana Abul Kalam Azad, Dr K.M. Munshi, Purushottamdas Tandon, Pandit Govind Ballabh Pant and Gopinath Bordoloi. Pandit Nehru was a special invitee to the meeting of the committee, which finally expressed that ‘the committee are satisfied that the minorities themselves feel that in their own interests, no less than in the interests of the country as a whole, the statutory reservation of seats for religious minorities should be abolished.’

Commending his Committee’s Report in the Constituent Assembly on 27 February 1947, Sardar Patel said: In the long run, it would be in the interest of all to forget that there is anything like a majority or a minority in this country and that in India there is only one community.

Related Posts:

Dividing India: One bit at a Time

More on Sachar, OBCs, reservations etc…

Literacy rates and “first claims”…

Reservation for Muslims by Zoya Hassan and finally, A rethink on majority and minorities…

B Shantanu

Political Activist, Blogger, Advisor to start-ups, Seed investor. One time VC and ex-Diplomat. Failed mushroom farmer; ex Radio Jockey. Currently involved in Reclaiming India - One Step at a Time.

You may also like...

14 Responses

  1. K P Ganesh says:

    Make this minority appeasement of Congress as “SHIA” appeasement. They are the most populating sect of Islam in UP at present. A few months ago there was a Wikileaks that stated that petrodollars were been sent through hawala route from Iran, Saudi Arabia through Pakistan to UP, which of course by now would have found it’s way into Congress kitty, purely for the sake of minority appeasement. The Iraq-Iran conflict into which US intervened with devastating effects, without thinking twice of the consequence has handed over a firm grip to the 100% Shia populace of Iran by destroying a Sunni country (Iraq). As recently as few days ago, there was a call in public by few Islamic clerics to disband Wahabism, the most prominent ideology that preaches Jihad, something quite popular with the narrow minded Shia’s compared to the liberal minded Sunni’s or the Ahmedia’s. But of course all these ideologies become secondary in India, where the dynastic politics is trying every dirty trick in it’s book to ensure that country remains divided on religious, caste etc. lines so that Congress can enjoy the riches at “aamadmi” plight. Governance in the name of Socialistic, secular views.

  2. sudhav says:

    It would seem that people in goverment have such regressive brains that they can think of nothing that would actually help progress..indeed they think of all that can stifle the pace of progress, and reservation does that in a grand way.Reservation based on caste, religion and gender. What is wrong with using intelligence, merit and excellence as the defining qualities?.
    The Indians can’t excel at anything.. except for population growth.

  3. Rakesh Bhatt says:

    Political Parties are playing ‘Divide and Rule’ Policy.Earlier b/w castes ,now b/w religions.

    Now imp ques arises, what can be done?

    Can Reservation Based on Religion be challenged in Court of Justice?

  4. B Shantanu says:

    From SC refuses to entertain plea against quota for minorities:

    PTI | 06:02 PM,Feb 27,2012

    New Delhi, Feb 27 (PTI) The Supreme Court today refused to entertain a plea challenging Centre’s decision to carve out a 4.5 percent sub-quota for minorities from within the existing 27 percent reservation for other backward classes (OBCs) in educational institutions. A bench of justices H L Dattu and C K Prasad asked the petitioner to approach the high court against the government’s decision to give reservation to Muslims, Sikhs, Christians, Buddhists and Zoroastrians (Parsis) within the 27 percent OBC quota.
    Petitioner Vikrant Yadav sought the apex court’s intervention into the matter, pleading that the Centre’s decision was arbitrary and illegal and it should be set aside. “The said creation of a 4.5 percent sub-quota for minorities within the existing 27 percent reservation for OBCs is illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, divisive and not in public interest and is also violative of Fundamental Rights,” Yadav said in his petition. He said the reservation cannot be given on the basis of religion and the socially and educationally backward classes of minority communities are already included in the 27 percent reservation provided to the OBCs. “The present resolution has been passed without ascertaining whether the religious or linguistic minorities are actually in the need of any such preferential reservation within the OBC quota,” the petition said. The Centre on December 22 last year had decided to carve out the sub-quota for minorities from within the existing reservation for OBCs and had notified Muslims, Sikhs, Christians, Buddhists and Zoroastrians (Parsis) as minority communities. The decision was taken on the basis of recommendation of the National Commission for Religious and Linguistic Minorities.

  5. Ashish says:

    @Shantanu

    Last nail? after SC rejecting the plea. Can’t we do anything about it now? It was not clear why SC actually do not want entertain it.

  6. B Shantanu says:

    From an email by Sh Krishen Kak, titled: “The camel is slowly taking over the tent….”:
    ..the Samajwadi Party chief and his son agreed to raise the strength of the Muslim Cabinet Ministers in the Government from three to five and also accepted the demand of giving adequate representation to the Muslims in the district administration by appointing District Magistrates and SPs and SSPs from amongst the minority community..
    Source: http://www.thehindu.com/news/states/other-states/article3308280.ece

    DMs and SPs and SSPs are IAS and IPS “cadre posts”. Now, the UP govt will create Muslim cadres within the all-India service cadres.
    Already, reservations of various kinds determine selection to the IAS, etc., though the IAS, etc. are supposed to be merit-based. Now, through the backdoor, a reservation based on religion is being created.

  7. B Shantanu says:

    From 4.5% reservation for minorities in IITs from this year by R. RAVIKANTH REDDY:
    There is good news for IIT aspirants from the minority community. The IIT-JEE Admission Committee has decided to implement 4.5 per cent reservation for them within the 27 per cent seats meant for the Other Backward Classes (OBCs) from this year.
    ..
    and the result:
    ..Speaking to TOI, Rahman, a student of Sri Chaitanya Junior College, Madhapur said that he would opt for admission into the computer science department at IIT-Bombay, one of the most sought after among the IITs.

    “With my general category rank (159) I would not have made the cut off for computer science engineering (CSE) at IIT-B. But with the quota rank, it would be possible for me to get the seat of my choice,” said Rahman.

    Another student with a good rank in the minority quota list, Sheik Abdul Akram, too, would like to join IIT-B. “I secured a rank of 1,994 in the general category and 13 in the minority quota list. I would definitely have got a seat in one of the IITs, but the quota has made the admission easier,” said Akram, also a city-based student.
    ..
    Mohd Abdul Muqeeth, who secured the 34th rank in JEE (3,643 in general), said that he is glad that reservations have been introduced. Mujavar Basheer Ahmed, at 7,977 on the general category list but with the 83rd rank in the minority category, said that but for the minority quota he would have had to take the exam again.

    The reservation is expected to change the composition of the premier technical institutions in the country, experts said. “The percentage of minority candidates from the state making it to the top six IITs used to be negligible till last year. But with the reservations, the tally this year has altogether increased to 5% on general and reservation seats. This is a welcome change,” said a coordinator of a coaching institute in the city.

  8. B Shantanu says:

    How many of you read this piece of “news” yesterday?
    http://www.indianexpress.com/news/amend-constitution-to-provide-reservation-to-muslims-chandrababu-naidu/955238/
    Amend Constitution to provide reservation to Muslims: Chandrababu Naidu

    which probably was in response to Andhra HC’s decision on the “Muslim” quota”..
    Also read:
    http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2012-05-29/india/31886803_1_religious-minorities-religious-quota-obc-listSub-quota for Muslims: Govt to challenge Andhra HC verdict in SC

    And at least some of you may remember that the government had stayed an earlier decision by Andhra HC:
    http://www.hindu.com/2010/03/26/stories/2010032662340100.htm

  9. Rakesh Bhatt says:

    1-Verdict of AP high court deserves applause.

    2-The Bench declared that the Central government had “exceeded the constitutional boundaries,” by providing reservation on religious lines, and failed to apply its mind.

    The Bench said the religious groups for whom the reservation was provided were heterogeneous, rather than homogeneous, to be clubbed.

    3-Now Wisdom of SC (and Indians) is in question.

  10. B Shantanu says:

    Placing this here for teh record: Implement reservations else say good bye to Muslims votes in 2014: Islamic summit in Hyderabad
    By the way, “the Islamic Summit (was) organized by Markazi Majlis-e-Quadria (MQM) a Sufi organization”!

  11. B Shantanu says:

    While you were sleeping (emphasis added),

    The Prime Minister chaired a cabinet meeting yesterday and approved a bill which should stun all students of political science. This bill threatens to subjugate all institutions to the same set of people who are now ruling the country.

    The bill paves the way for mandatory accreditation of all higher educational institutes (except Agriculture !). The idea is there will be a number of government accreditation agencies – both at the state and central level. Every college and university must obtain a certificate from the relevant agency within a particular timeframe or face a slew of penalties including closure…The apex regulator NARA would be responsible for registering and monitoring the functioning of the various bodies. It is also the place for dispute resolution, setting fee structures for the agencies, imposing various penalties and so forth.

    Until this point there is hardly any room for quarrel against this bill.

    What is stunning is : Yesterday 29th August 2012, the Prime Minister Manmohan Singh chaired a cabinet meeting. In this meeting, the 9 members in the regulator were brought under a quota system for SC/ST/OBC/Minority and Women.

    “The National Accreditation Regulatory Authority for Higher Educational Institutions Bill, 2010 paved way for representation of OBCs, SC, STs, women and minority as members in the authority. While tabling the Bill in the Lok Sabha on August 9, Sibal had said the amendment would also include a member of the minority community in the regulatory authority. The Bill seeks to set up the authority to register and monitor accreditation agencies.” [Pioneer/ Deccan Herald]


    Now there is absolutely no national interest served by having a communal quota in this regulatory body. This isnt even harmless, what such a communal quota implies is that even in normal economic activity – persons of one community cannot be relied upon to adjudicate issues involving others. Actually not even adjudicate, persons of one community cant even apply well written regulations no matter how accomplished that person is while being selected for the regulatory position.

    …We are entering a bizarre world where appointees are selected not from the best available but from the best available within the community that has a roster opening.
    The professors have to reveal their community for selection. Even if they revealed it, a woman professor can be counted against women quota, against OBC , or against the open category. The whole scheme is a pile of anomalies waiting to hit the Supreme Court.
    If you accept this quota, you have nothing when other regulators and constitutional bodies are brought under the quota too. Why not have the TRAI and SEBI have quotas ?
    This is a first, but not the last.
    . courtesy the ever-vigilant and redoubtable RealityCheck

  12. B Shantanu says:

    How many of you caught this?
    In the name of “diverse” representation – which could as easily have been achieved by having people from different professions, background, experience etc..the establishment continues to fall back on time-tested “quotas”..Almost impossible to believe that they were only meant to be for 15 years..

    The panel did not recommend any change in the clause3 (2) (b) Bill, 2011 that provides for 50 per cent membership on the Lokpal shall from Scheduled castes, Scheduled Tribes, Other Backward Classes, Minorities and Women.

    Reference: Parliamentary panel’s recommendation on a collegium for selecting the head of CBI [link]

    ***

  13. B Shantanu says:

    Pl do read this article by Arun Shourie from Jan ’12 in full: Chasing that bank of votes again.
    Also uploaded a pdf version here: https://www.box.net/shared/3g2tedilyqvqwbynkr04

  14. B Shantanu says:

    Excerpts from Sh Rajiv Malhotra’s recent essay, Rebutting The Latest Woke Attack On Hindu Universalism By Western Academia, Nov 28, 2022:
    What is important to note are the numerous differences between Indian and American social histories that cannot be whitewashed. One cannot treat a malady based on a false diagnosis. India’s minorities (Muslims and Christians) came as foreign conquerors who ruled over the native majority of Hindus for centuries.

    In contrast, the American Blacks did not come as African conquerors defeating the native White people and ruling over them. The Muslim rulers in India imposed their Persian language and the Christian rulers their English as the official languages of India. They imposed their own foreign social and political structures, named cities and monuments after themselves, and committed genocides that are well-documented.

    Despite being numerical minorities, they installed their narratives on the Hindu majority which we are still trying to decolonise. Black Americans are not inheritors of any such past oppression committed by their African ancestors.

    A common excuse being given to exempt Muslim invaders as colonisers is that they eventually ‘settled’ in India starting with Babur (several centuries after the Islamic invasions started). But nobody has given the White Americans of European origin the same free pass for the oppression of the native Americans, even though the Whites did become settlers in America.

    White people’s atrocities and accomplishments are separately listed, and the atrocities are not denied. But there is a double standard in the treatment given to India’s Muslim colonisers: only their contributions are given prominence. Their genocides of Hindu natives, though documented by their own scribes as great accomplishments against infidels, are deemed politically incorrect to mention.

    I wish to emphasise that India’s present-day Muslims and Christians should not bear any responsibility for the past atrocities committed by previous generations belonging to the same faiths. This is just like saying that whatever my past ancestors might have done is not my personal burden and responsibility.

    Just like I want to be judged only by my own personal conduct, so also, I must judge others solely by their own personal conduct. This is why I oppose blame games in which oppressors/oppressed are assigned based on their respective past ancestors.