Open Thread to discuss “Youth and Politics” – UPDATED
Pl continue the discussion on Offstumped Live here via the comments section…
Image courtesy: Wikipedia
*** Excerpts from the Transcript of the Online Discussion: Long, but fascinating post ***
Don’t miss the four online polls and their results (inline)
Ashwin Kumaraswamy:Â Youth can be broadly be defined as one who has uncluttered throught process, may be between the age group of 16 – 40
Dipinder Sekhon: There are two ways of thinking about it: based on age … say 18/20 to 35/40 could be called “youth” … the other (better in my opinion) is to think of “mindset”
Amit Malviya: In the political context and from the perspective of nation building it is anyone who cares and is willing to do something about it. These are people with aspiration and importantly the ability to shape their future and that of the Nation. I call them Middle India.
Ashwin Kumaraswamy:Â I agree with Dipinder on the issue of mindset
Dipinder Sekhon: Youthful midset is full of positive energy, less cynical, has the advantage of ignorance to pick up large challenges
Online Poll: What is youth?
18-30 ( 26% )
18-40 ( 53% )
18-25 ( 0% )
18-35 ( 21% )
Shantanu: OK, so although “age” may seem to be imporant, that should not be the deciding criteria. Is that right?
Ashwin Kumaraswamy: Yes – i agree
Amit Malviya:Â I don’t agree that age is important.
Dipinder Sekhon: Yup Shantanu Ji …. but there is a strong correlation between the age band and “youth mindset” … though we should acknowledge exceptions and include them in youth
Ashwin Kumaraswamy: age is important because of certain attributes which are infectious such as idealism, dare to dream and also ones mind which is uncluttered
Amit Malviya: Its the intent that is critical.
Shantanu: Let me move on to the next question which is getting to the core of the issue…Why should youth be involved in politics at all?
Ashwin Kumaraswamy: Intent is critical absolutely – no one disagrees with it, but as one gains experience, there is an inherent realism that kicks in which needs to be tempered
Ashwin Kumaraswamy: In my view there are three main reasons why we need youth to engage with Politics
- Politics is a medium and a platform which makes decisions that have an ever lasting impact on the society at large – the decision making would become skewed if youth are not part of the decision making process
- Political decision making at times is a thankless job – in my observation all politicians start with being idealists but soon grow out of it – younger generation have infectious attributes such as “idealism, passion, energy, mind to dream without any restrictions and un cluttered “ which would act as check and balance to the rest of the political class
- Most importantly young India needs a young shoulder to carry the responsibility of steering India in this 21st century – how long can we rely on Manmohan Singh, Pranab Mukherjee, L K Advani, Sharad Pawar, Mulayam, Lalu, Mayawati, Karunanidhi, H D Devegowda and others….Is it not time to give them some well deserved rest for all the hard work they have put in the last 4 decades.
Shantanu: Isnt politics today a dirty cesspool where you are more likely to end up frustrated and disapppinted – and worse significantly poor off financially than if you were gainfully employed?
Comment From ramkumaran ramkumaran : youth is important because that is the uncorrect age with lots of hope
Comment From Gaurav Patwa Gaurav Patwa : i agree with amit
Dipinder Sekhon:
The state of governance in India is very poor – criminals and corrupt are entering politics in droves. It is difficult to change old mindsets, long living change can come only from the youth
Amit Malviya: We are all fully aware of the state of our nation. What happened to India that it got into this state? It must be that incompetent people have been at the helm of affairs since India’s independence — and perhaps even before. Our parents were not in politics. They left it to others. What would our parents say to us if we were to ask them, “Why didn’t you do something?” What will you tell your children and your grandchildren when they ask you, “What were you doing? Why didn’t you care enough to do something when you could see that the country was going to hell?” What would you tell your children should motivate you to do something now. Big reason for youth to engage.
Online Poll: How Should youth b engaged in Politics
Start a new party ( 7% )
Work as Interns ( 33% )
Join Orgs like FoBJP etc (60% )
Shantanu: So: here are the steps to “HOW:
1. register to vote
2. join an existing/new pol gouping
3. make people aware o the issues
4. Try and make your elected rep accountable
fair summary?
Shantanu: Actually, step 2 can come later…how about this sequence….
1. regir to vote
2. make ppl aware of issus
3. make elected reps accounable
4. get involved with some pol group?
Dipinder Sekhon: Yup – as a sequence this is fine …. but again, it is important to get to stage 4 …. Just 1-3 are not enough
Ashwin Kumaraswamy: I agree with the process suggested by Shantanu, but point 2 and point 3 needs to be well defined and need to see that it does not go down the way of beign arm chair critics
Shantanu: we all agree that it is good to register.,.and good ot make your elected rep accountable…can I spend 5mins on exactly how does one make an elected rep accountable?
Dipinder Sekhon: Yes – sure. One very good step maybe to track budgets and investments. Prevent leakage of funds … “more transparent buget and financial processes” with strong public scrutiny may help to a very large extent
Shantanu: But what leverage do you have? How can you make sure your voice is heard? Any ideas?
Ashwin Kumaraswamy: Every elected member has a constituency office, the constituents can actuall;y get their issues addressed through his or her office. Also as a powerful votign block constituents shsould routinely ask their representatives to engage with the constituents to understand where they stand on issues and reflect that rather than merely following the party line
Shantanu: So RTI perhaps?
Dipinder Sekhon: RTI, and making people around aware – through media, email campaigns maybe – could be useful in shaping public opinion
Shantanu: Good points Ashwin,Dipinder…I think we have lost Amit for a while…hopefully he will be back…on to the issu of raising awareness…role of media etc…
Shantanu: OK guys: Lets concentrate now on the MOST important (and difficult) question I think: existing vs new/…
Online Poll: Will a new Political party with youth focus succeed
Yes ( 28% )
No ( 72% )
Ashwin Kumaraswamy: I dont think there is time to build new organisation!!!
Dipinder Sekhon: Shantanu – it may not be easy to argue for Or against new or existing
Amit Malviya: The idea is to identify with a political discourse and try and bring about the kind of change you want to see through them.
Ashwin Kumaraswamy: Good example is Lokparitran – started with great fan fare, but sad to see it degenerated based on ones egos
Dipinder Sekhon: Key point against existing – they have been there for long, they are rotten to the core, complete change is required, it is not possible to reform them now as wrong practices and processes have become too deep rooted
Amit Malviya: I disagree with Dipinder. A party is made of people. If you fill a glass half full with muddy water with clean one – the level of mud will reduce.
Dipinder Sekhon: Do we have examples of political organisations reforming totally themselves in terms of ideologies Or ethics?
Dipinder Sekhon: We probably have more examples of revolutionary changes from new groupings?
Shantanu: Can I ask a deliberately provocative question (building on what apgo commented a min ago): Will registering, talking, town halls etc really help? or does one have to get fully immersed…and be prepared to face a lifetime of misery, hardship and struggle… Are we being too idealistic (and perhaps naive)?
Dipinder Sekhon: The latter Shantanu Ji …. discussions/townhalls/education – are ultimately with the hope that better people enter politics …. who could things …including systemic changes (eg. campaign finance)
Ashwin Kumaraswamy: Unfortunately there is no magic formula to brign about engagement Shantanu
Vijay Vikram : Shantanu is absolutely right. It echoes a point earlier by Amit. a) It is a small bunch of committed men who’ll bring about political renewal in India. b) If you are committed to political renewal you have to prepared to face a lifetime of misery and hardship.
Shantanu: Key take-aways so far:
Get involved (register yrself; vote; ask questions of yr rep)
Get engaged: become aware, join existing, new pol organsiation
spread awareness: get others interested.
Shantanu: BUT
it will be a long process
possibly very painful, frustrating…
possibly may cause enormous hardships
..
My own three paise – what I fondly call the 3 “I”s.
1. Get interested (and get others interested)
2. Get informed (and make others aware)
3. Get involved (join a new or an existing pol formation)
Comment From jemin_p: @TO ail: 1st n most important q: how much comfort a youth feels in current system of politics; problem is nt wid ideologies i guess; problem is wid adaptation to the new wrld; accepting new ideas n catching the pulse of new generation
Comment From BJPSupporter: I suggest FoBJP to strengthen its organisation and rope in yougsters from the elite educational institutes. Also,e-registration should be made available to involve all those netizens who comprise of the huge support BJP enjoys online!
Comment From aaindian: Our youth leadership is a shadow of the old brigade with family members ruling the roost. The entry barrier for real youth leaders is very high. Consistent hard work, preserverence and thought leadership is must to shape India
Comment From Vikram Ahuja: Elected reps have to be made more accountable & answerable about their promises.
Comment From ramkumaran: coming to the point how can dynasty youth favour be reduced, those who get chance are from the existing politicos dynasty only this happens in many partie
Comment From AkhilRana: TO ALL: Why have Media & People been very critical of People like Baba Ramdev entering into politics? He seconds thoughts that are the need of the hour. What does the Panel think of him for coming into Politics ?
Comment from jemin_p: @amit: we all are mistaken here; youth n educated yoiuth is reqd to manage politics and not to do mindless work; hence interaction is reqd/ b informed/ manage things/propogate the idea to help … kaam toh koi bhi karega ..bt to make ill formed thing is wat is reqd .. n thts wat we r supposta do as informed youth
Comment From apgo2000: About the analogy of adding clean water to make the glass of muddy water cleaner. What if it isnt mud, just algae that will grow in the cleaner water too? All the youth bodies that i have engaged in are run by youngsters with connections, with an objective to pocket more money. They are as corrupt as the existing parties, only on a smaller scale. The new “idealists” who join just become as corrupt in a matter of time.
Comment From Rohith Nathan: @ amit . because everyone has to start at the lowest rank . they have to stick posters . catch flags etc . thats not what educated youth want to do . ‘youth cadre’ basically does all the leg work . at least thats how it is in TN
Comment From trailblazr: I agree with Amit. The BSP is an example that all new political groupings don’t work in national interest. Problem with Indian political parties seems to be that they all take up specific causes which serve specific people. Hence, automatically creating boundaries. Even if they didn’t intend to.
Comment From apgo2000: @ Shantanu and Amit. Both of you said it will be difficult process and painful one. How difficult and painful? Is death a fair price to pay? When all governance bodies including youth bodies are tainted, how many youth will be willing to risk their lives to make their voice heard? India has no whitleblower’s policies. Even IAS and their families are hacked to death for raising voice against corruption. How difficult is difficult?
Guys: completely agree that entry barriers are high…which is why we need to come together…to stand on each others shoulders and reach higher…
Pl PLEASE join one of the existing/ new pol formations…(or even more than one) Does not matter which…
Comment From thinkerspad: The point is that if the Political Parties do not create better platforms for talent recognition, you will find more and more politically active youth wanting to be CEO of their own parties.
Shantanu: @Apgo: difficult means VERY very difficult…If you are really serious about this, make sure your family and loved ones understand the risks – and support you on this …
Comment From apgo2000: @ Dipinder (Older generation being aligned with Nehruvian Socialism and Youth being progressive) I studied in Delhi University. All the youth politicians there still want a socialist policymaking attitude. Progressive? they are far from progressive. They dont want to pay more than Rs 15 per year on quality education and burn down buses when you try to hike fares in an attempt to imporve service. They still want govt provisioning for food, and cafeteria rates of food to have cieling of Rs 10 in the face of hike in prices.
Comment From jemin_p: @ To all: we must decide the role to b played: rembr every one is nt gud at everything; so deciding a role is imp apart frm bein learned: a person cn b gud leader; nt every can b; few can support logistically; so deciding the role n doing it is imp; bt again grooming n direction frm experience is reqd
Comment From apgo2000: @ All: Is idealism enough or having the right ideals more important?
Comment From KVSarmaJ: @akalpita ji, by how does one get a voter to think about credentials? I mean like some one on a blog wrote, if my uncle stands for election, though i know that his opposition is well learned, I will vote for my uncle!
Comment From quietist: @all do you support the compulsory voting law proposed by the gujarat govt? will it make the youth take more interest in politics?
Comment From संदीप शेळके: Where are the role models? All are killed by congressi raj; Do we see names of Sardar Pateji, SM Mukharji, Lal Lahadur Shashtriji, Rajaji, Netaji Bose given to any new work or the initiative? We see only congressis out there. So how this can inspire the youth?
Shantanu: @Thinkerspad, All: A wordof sincere (and only partly facetious) advice: STOP reading the mainstream newspapers and watching TV to get your news (assuming you have net acess of course)…there is far more that goes on out there which never gets reported – or discussed/
Comment from ipramodv: @all panelists Dont you think the easier way is to join an NGO and do our bit a) we can have the satisfaction of doing our bit b) we wont have pressures of sticking to ideologies c) We need not be sycophants to reach a level and by the time we reach the level forget what we are in there for
Comment From संदीप शेळके: @Shantanu: Why dont good (reach) people help start a media and publishing house? Otherwise every news will me adulterated for sure.
Comment From thinkerspad: @All and Shantanu, how does the youth that otherwise doesn’t get hooked onto twitters and stuff ensure what’s happening beyond MSM? And how do you know each alternative news is true?
Shantanu: @Ipramodv: Let us not kid ourselves…NGO (non-governmental) is NOT the way to solve governmental problems
Amit Malviya: @ipramodv I would argue that see it as being in public life and doing good for the country. The vehicle could be either politics or NGO as you said.
Comment From jemin_p:Â @dipinder thts wat; identify roles; a person nt gud orator bt wid ideas will b difficult to lead; bt cnt b discarded he cn b gr8 support; so wrking as per capabilities is imp rather thn mad rush to b politician; evn thr is huge need to pptl to support politics; bt glamour n publicity has diluted the necessity of logistics n ground level wrker
Comment From thinkerspad: @Dipinder there’s no such thing as right or wrong ideology. There’s only right and wrong governance. Ideological debates for youth must be administered through senior and seasoned leaders only.
Dipinder Sekhon: @ipramodv – disagree with you. It may be easier, but may not satisfying if you really want good governance. Eg. you build a school, but govt does not build the school it was supposed to – total number of schools built remains the same …. no change overall (this is well studied … the concept of “fungibility”)
Comment From Akalpita Paranjpe: @ipramodi there are thousands of ngo, and yet, we have not been able to make an iota of change.
Comment From ipramodv: But how do u think a completely new face is going to fetch votes: a) the rich dont vote b) the MSM has a very important role in grabbing the middle class votes and c) the poor often fall for money.
Online Poll: Will you leave your job to join politics
Yes ( 37% )
No ( 26% )
Maybe ( 37% )
Offstumped: Disagree with the idea that politics has to be a full time profession. Many models for part time legislatures Texas has one which meets straight once a year to dispose business while legislators return to their day jobs
Shantanu: quitting u r job is not a prereq though…but frees you up to do more substantive things. I think
Ashwin Kumaraswamy: @ Dipinder – why should job pressure prevent youth from engaging in politics. It all depends on what lifestyle one needs to have. Take the example of Meenakshi Natrajan, an young MP from a poor backgroudn entered politics because she wanted to brign about change
centerofright: @ssudhir Yes long term change can happen oonly if you can make your time count
Amit Malviya: @centerofright My take on it – don’t quit jobs and join politics till you have a perinial source of income or are financially comfortable. Otherwise you’ll be contributing to corruption at some point. Support from family very important. There several ways to contribute to public life and nation building even when in job.
Comment From संदीप शेळकेसंदीप शेळके: @COR: I’ll be leaving my job by December 2011 and entering full time politics. I dont care about the post I hold or reach. All care that my life would be spent for the dream which I always saw and which didn’t let me sleep
Comment From jemin_p: @centerforright thts d wrong notion; a thanless n payless job will always attract corruption: politics is best eg:. get the workers paid officially n thy wuld b more den ready to join; no 1 like to live on donation types (educated youth). I am ready to work for ideologies i support: bt no shame to wrk 24*7 need to support myself; n if gvn OFFICIAL pay checks nt only me bt many wuld b ready; organize the system
Shantanu: But lets not kid ourselves…full0tmie (clean) politics in India does NOT pay…you either need to have a supporting family/spouse…or a hefty inheritance
Comment From flyfiddlesticks: @COR will definitely not quit job for politics. Right now its seen as a “service” without any means to provide for a family unless corrupt. And that is a disaster.
Comment From Schizo Phrenic: why should politics not pay? and politics is a “job”
Dipinder Sekhon: Agree with Amit – on quitting job
Offstumped: We need to rework the current culture where career politicians are a must. It is important to earn a living outside politics – Nitin Gadkari is a good example
Shantanu: @Schizo: It should(pay) but it does not (in India, at present)
Comment From ramkumaran: @Dipinder rather than pay politicians why not curb their electoral expenses at all , no campaigns or anything just register 2 contest and post your opinions on a govt funded newspaper ad, slot on doordarshan
Comment From quietist: @centerofright, agree with @dipinder on state/institutional funding of elections, why can’t political parties be forced to make their finances transparent?
Ashwin Kumaraswamy: Mjority of the important politicians now in India are at a stage where they dotn need to earn from politics
flyfiddlesticks: @amit @COR @shantanu the existing thing about “politics is social service” needs to change. Its a profession. If we complain about Armymen having poor quality of life, why shouldnt we get the politicians on the same basis? The whole hypocrisy is ridiculous and keeps paying the corrupt and screwing the country.
Comment From Schizo Phrenic: @shantanu conceded, but it should not persist that way
Comment From flyfiddlesticks: +1 @jemin. And we cant go 24-7 into politics unless we sacrifice our wellbeing and a family!
Shantanu: ALL: Those hwo cannot join full-time activism need not loose heart. There are many alternative ways to get involved…Start by supporting someone who is already involved…
jemin_p: y do ppl xpect a politician to do a job widout pay; n den say in whisper he is earning crores;
Ashwin Kumaraswamy: @ thinkerpad If we accept the importance of politics and its impact then – for a young country like India – why is there a lack of quality in efficient and effective political leadership? Youth of India form the largest block of population – if this block is not engaged in political process – how can one steer young India in this 21st century?
Need for continuity of efficient and effective political decision making – Founding fathers of India very young when they engaged with the freedom movement and after independence they provided an environment of democracy to flourish and the current set of political leadership were young when they came one board to steer India through the last 3 decades. It is time for a new set of youngsters to gain experience and eventually graduate to the helm of the political process
Shantanu: Shameless plug: Here is how I managed to move from talk to action(in a very limited way though): https://satyameva-jayate.org/about-me/
I realise evreyone’s circumstances are different.
Dipinder Sekhon: @Ashwin – agreed that revolution needs time, persistance and hard work. Do not agree on enough talent/intent with existing politicians
Amit Malviya: @ Rohith Agree with you. You have to get inside to clean it or even make a meaningful contribution.
Ashwin Kumaraswamy: @ Dipinder – what is required is not just with policy skills, but most importantly who can take the majority along with him or her!! that is an absolutely necessary
Dipinder Sekhon: I managed to move from talk to action by joining FTI (http://freedomteam.in)
Comment From jemin_p: @shantanu: i may leave d job; if my family earning is secured: cuz despiute i want to change the country i need to feed my family. N by tht i mean feed frm official money n nt bribes: if i m been paid officially: i will join the party which coincides wid my ideology: m nt money mad; bt yes responsibility does shake me up; dunno of others
Dhananjay Bhide: How many of us are told by our parents to join politics..or evenn be politically active..Also, how many of us will ask our children to do so? The buck needs to stop at each one of us to make the difference..
Comment From Sagar Agrawal: Revolution is inevitable…bt for the name sake wont help…
Comment From Nixon Fernando: change is needed the fundamentel way we think… take this example… can an illiterate handle his village?
Comment From apgo2000: @ Dipinder: Where will you get these elected englightened policy knowing people from? There will again be a system for selecting these candidates? And wont that system be as prone to corruption as election of our MPs?
Malvika Saraogi: @all – I agree money is important, but there are other factors also. Otherwise, we could have seen many women (with working husbands to support them) in politics, for example.
Comment From Akalpita Paranjpe: @ dhananjay I for one was told by my mother to work for the country. I did start by joining bharat uday mission and now fti. And, what more, I have told my son to be prepared for the same.
Comment From Schizo Phrenic: i think the very fact that we are here, and talking about politics, hard talk, and have spent hours on twitter/other platforms discussing and networking means we are working and willing to do more, provided platform and leadership
Shantanu: All: Pl do share links of your activities etc so t hat otehrs can have a look too. Thanks
centerofright: @ all Is the youth ready to be the nameless, faceless karyakarthas who worked across partylines if they would like to get into politics or else they just want to be in limelight coz we are educated and percieved to be intelligent?
Ashwin Kumaraswamy: @ All – i am planning to enter active politics by the next general elections – i have been in the process of engaging with both urban and rural india. What i can say is rural india thinks differently to what we have shared and talked here.!!!
Ashwin Kumaraswamy: @ Thinkerpad – NREGA for example is a good policy – but its implementation is rather hopeless. The recent audit on NREGA has shown that the funds have been misused at the local level at some places to 90% and on few places the funds are un –used
Amit Malviya: @Ashwin I don’t agree with your views on NREGA. Do you want to create a battery of youth on state doles. I don’t think as a poor nation we can afford that.
Shantanu: @Ashwin, Amit: lets us not make this a cong vs bjp match….no time here…you are welcome to continue with that on my blog, though!
Comment From Schizo Phrenic: NREGA is aweful policy, policies that canoot be implemented are by definition awful, not to say paying pople for diggin up roads and filling them againt makes abs no sense
Amit Malviya: @Shantanu, Its about engaging the youth in productive work for asset creation, More a debate on policy.
shwin Kumaraswamy: @ Amit – we can talk into the merits of NREGA for sure, may be a better platform. it has helped rural india for sure at times of adversity. Until there is a realatively better bridge between rural and ruran india – we sould not talk about equality. Please do visit some villages in south india where NREGA has a positivre impact and also visit soem villagees in MP and UP where they have not had
Amit Malviya: @Ashwin I come from a village incidentally !
Shantanu: @Amit: Completeley agree with you..I’m not a fan of NREAG – asyou know…just want to keep this at aa highr level
Ashwin Kumaraswamy: @ Amit and others… on the larger question of NREGA can i ask Shantanu to start a different discussion, such that it does not get diluted
Amit Malviya: @Thinkerspad Had it been linked with a scheme like Grameen Sadak Yojana it would have been good. But digging ponds and filling them and sometime not even that is no good economics by any stretch of imagination !
Ashwin Kumaraswamy: @ Amit – i come from a village as well…
Amit Malviya: @Ashwim So we should agree to disagree on that one.
Ashwin Kumaraswamy: @ Amit – on NREGA it has been linked with constructive politics.. it is not a mere dole out of money. They need to work. Jobs are created.. it is not like it is free meals
Amit Malviya: @Ashwin I am afraid can’t agree with you on that. If that was the intention there are better ways of doing it !
Amit Malviya: As John F Kennedy said to his nation, “We will do this not because it is easy, but because it is hard.” If you are not working on solving a hard problem, you are wasting your time. You should just go and retire. We all have enough to keep us living a good life. We should just call it quits. I want to know how many here are alright with calling it quits !
Comment From thinkerspad: @Amit So, you are discussing the structure of NREGA. For that matter even Food for Work was good. It directly ensured the basic. SO, we like this gap that you have shown to everyone. Deeper thinking into policy implementation is needed and Youth is invited to join politics for that.
Comment From Schizo Phrenic: @shantanu KEY question unanswered or needs to be summarrized: HOW does one encourage youngsters to enter politics
Dipinder Sekhon: Closing comments: Important for Indian youth and civil society to engage in direct politics, in addition to being politically aware and inspiring others; A revolution of the scale of a “second freedom struggle” (this time for our economic freedoms) is what is required; unlikely for the change to come from the large existing political parties – they are rotten to the core; need to improve incentives for ethical/competent folks to enter politics eg. well paid politicians, state funding of elections etc; just good intent not sufficient, need proper goal oriented ideologies and policies; need to learn from failed small party experiments of the past in India, and successful ones in history and world over
Shantanu: KEY QUESTION: How does one encourage youngsters to get involved?
By setting a personal example…
Show by action…as all our panelists are doing – in their own different ways.
Dear All: Pl continue the discussion here: https://satyameva-jayate.org/2010/03/27/open-thread-youth-politics/
I promise to read ALL comments…and to reply to each to the extent that I can…
Ashwin Kumaraswamy: Thanks for the opportunity offstumped and Shantanu !!! Also best wishes to everyone to engage in active politics!!!
Amit Malviya: Thank your moderators and those who participated. It was a great learning. Thank you once again.
***
Please note that these excerpts were selected by me based on what I felt was important, interesting and relevant. Omission of your comments and/or remarks has not been intentional or directed. Pl feel free to add your thoughts if I had missed them (and pl accept my apologies for the same). Also, pl ignore the loose formatting. I hope it does not distract too much from the content. You can read the full transcript on the Offstumped Live website by clicking on the Replay button and logging in with your Facebook & Twitter accounts.
Pl feel free to share with your friends and concerned citizens and pl. do share your thoughts and comments below. Thanks.
Dear all,
Thanks a lot for the opportunity, especially Mr. B shantanu. it was an interesting exchange, a lot of people who were thinking managed to get into the discussion, i am sure there were many observers as well. Finger pointing at politicians wont help, suggesting that a few people will come together and solve the problem will not help, a group of people cannot get into parliament unless they are a huge group, genuine, have an inspirational idea that storms every indian, it has to be humanist and all inclusive (none of the dividing ideologies), and possibly fired by the youth… money should not be an issue if the idea is powerful… the situation is ripe… it should happen…
mr nixon, i totally agree that it is high time we move past just pointing fingers and generally being sour about how bad our politicians are,
but to reform politics, it takes politicians, and people, the kind we had, visionaries. like patel and tilak.
it requres personal effort, as many in todays discussion demonstrated, small as they might be, they are nevethless powerful in the vision they embrace, entering politics is a way of taking responsibility for the mess.
how about you consider and arganization like http://bit.ly/af8aX5 freedom team of india?
we need to stop blaming the media, politicians and fate, this is my country, i am responsible, for its failure as muchas its success
@ Nixon and Anand,
Totally agree with you when you say “stop blaming the media, politicians and others for the degradation in politics” – it is time for the change and for that to happen youth in politics is an enabler for the change to evolve!!!
Be it Freedom team of India, BJP, Congress or any other political party for that matter.. it is important to be part of the political process in a pro-active fashion rather than being a critic or reactive!!
Dear Shantanu
I’m not quite clear how this thing works. When I click on the ‘town hall’ I see a huge screen saying ‘replay’. Is there a way to download the entire discussion that took place, on your blog?
Regards
Sanjeev
@ Nixon: Thanks for joining in..glad that you enjoyed the discussion and found it thought-provoking…Hopefully we will get a chance to do a similar one again.
@ Ajay: You are right in saying“we need to stop blaming the media, politicians and fate, this is my country, i am responsible, for its failure as muchas its success”
and @Ashwin: Yes, “it is important to be part of the political process in a pro-active fashion rather than being a critic or reactive!!” Thanks for joining in as a panelist yesterday.
@ Sanjeev: You wil need to click the replay button and log in with your Facebook or twitter username/passwd. The site has some glitches so if it does not work, pl try again in a few hours.
You can now read the excerpts above.
It is reassuring to read the contributions of the youth to the Town Hall discussion. I so regret that I could not contribute to the debate in the heat of its moment…
It certainly seems to be not just an uphill struggle to create a new kind of politics in Bharat but a stratospheric one! As an antidote let me pose this rather well worn joke ( somewhat paraphrased)…How does one eat up the Indian elephant of Indian body politic? ….Teaspoon by teaspoon…..
Most young Indians I have recently met say how Bharat is changing at a meteoric rate..When asked in what way, I am regaled with the rapid industrialization of the nation and the generation of enormous wealth and consumer power. And yet I also get the impression that they do not have a breadth of understanding as regards the uniqueness of their heritage and Bharatiya inheritance and how pressing it is to take action NOW……
Dear Shantanu
A brilliant initiative! And outstanding discussion. Congratulations to all participants for raising and discussing crucial issues so coherently. I sense the possibility of a good future for India – but IF ONLY THESE EXCELLENT PEOPLE CONTINUE THEIR THOUGHT PROCESS AND DON’T GIVE UP!! So easy it is to give up. I know from experience.
Now for some of my comments on the discussion:
Ashwin Kumaraswamy: Good example is Lokparitran – started with great fan fare, but sad to see it degenerated based on ones egos
MY COMMENT: The greatest problem facing India’s youth is that they are not used to work in teams. Either they are bootlickers or egotists who cannot successfully listen and negotiate with others. None of these Youth movements will go anywhere without a TOTAL FOCUS on team work. The Freedom Team of India is designed for such team work. It has been hard, but after two years, there is a team that is starting to emerge. I’m at least half confident now that it may succeed. I can’t say that about ANY other youth outfit in India today.
Comment From thinkerspad: @Dipinder there’s no such thing as right or wrong ideology. There’s only right and wrong governance. Ideological debates for youth must be administered through senior and seasoned leaders only.
MY COMMENT: Unfortunately, there is NO POSSIBILITY OF GOOD GOVERNANCE under either a socialist model (Nehruvian), or hypercapitalist model (current model in some cases). Please do try to read Breaking Free of Nehru (http://bfn.sabhlokcity.com/). The ideology of freedom is vital for good governance.
Shantanu: But lets not kid ourselves…full0tmie (clean) politics in India does NOT pay…you either need to have a supporting family/spouse…or a hefty inheritance
MY COMMENT: That’s why in ‘Breaking Free of Nehru’ I’ve advocated excellent salaries for people’s representatives. Singapore has that, for instance. As do most Western nations (UK pays poorly so its MPs have started becoming corrupt). Direct correlation between MP salaries and corruption/incompetence. Indeed, I have shown that the current political parties DO NOT WANT to pay well, else they’ll be given stiff resistance by good people.
Comment From Schizo Phrenic: why should politics not pay? and politics is a “jobâ€
MY COMMENT: FULLY AGREE! That’s absolutely necessary if we want India to become a livable country, not a place where the mafia rule.
Amit Malviya: @centerofright My take on it – don’t quit jobs and join politics till you have a perinial source of income or are financially comfortable. Otherwise you’ll be contributing to corruption at some point. Support from family very important. There several ways to contribute to public life and nation building even when in job.
MY COMMENT: I have always advocated NEVER giving up one’s job or income sources. Politics must be just another thing that good citizens do. IF voted to represent people, give up the job, else NOT.
Comment From quietist: @centerofright, agree with @dipinder on state/institutional funding of elections, why can’t political parties be forced to make their finances transparent?
MY COMMENT: This is not as hard as it seems. It request people like you to simply ask for a copy of the electoral accounts for Rs.1 and then demand accountability. Details in my book. Also: http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=76313193586&ref=share
Comment From Schizo Phrenic: NREGA is aweful policy, policies that canoot be implemented are by definition awful, not to say paying pople for diggin up roads and filling them againt makes abs no sense
MY COMMENT: Fully agree. The way to poverty elimination has to be simple and direct. Markets (with clean ethical governance) will fix 95% of poverty. The rest needs solutions outlined in ‘Breaking Free of Nehru’.
I fully endorse Dipinder’s comment in the end: “Important for Indian youth and civil society to engage in direct politics, in addition to being politically aware and inspiring others; A revolution of the scale of a “second freedom struggle†(this time for our economic freedoms) is what is required; unlikely for the change to come from the large existing political parties – they are rotten to the core; need to improve incentives for ethical/competent folks to enter politics eg. well paid politicians, state funding of elections etc; just good intent not sufficient, need proper goal oriented ideologies and policies; need to learn from failed small party experiments of the past in India, and successful ones in history and world over”
Dipinder has said it BRILLIANTLY! Good on you, Dipinder. You and the persons who participated (or listened in) are surely the future of India. There is still some hope, although the hard work needed is monumental.
We also need some luck. Someone among the big business sector who has tired of continuously bootlicking the feet of dirty corrupt politicians. Someone with self-respect. So far I haven’t found ANYONE in India (among big business). No more JRD Tatas unfortunately. But we may get lucky some day.
Anyone (with honestly earned money) in India with any self-respect? HELLO! If so, please donate to FTI (http://freedomteam.in/) so that we can start involving the youth of India in a big way.
For those who haven’t read FTI’s latest magazine please do read: http://www.freedomteam.in/mag/GreatIndia-13.pdf
Regards
Sanjeev Sabhlok
http://sanjeev.sabhlokcity.com/
Honorary Member, Freedom Team of India
Let it be understood – that biologically young does not mean politically young, and the reverse is also true – one can be politically young at 60!
there is need to separate the hype from the content in any discussion about the ‘role of youth’. rhetoric about revolution is all good to hear, but highly improbable.
however, youth is an important consideration today, perhaps even urgent – simply because youth are a major part of our demography; imagine, in a few decades this large chunk of population will be old, in addition to hordes and hordes of newer young’uns.This is a double-edged sword, pretty much like our large population – that has both advantages and disadvantages. The lifetime of an average Indian youth today will define an era in Indian history – things could go badly awry…
We have to marshall our youth, both economically and politically. Political mobilization need not be restricted to induction of youth into already existing political establishments.
There is a need to de-link politics and corruption in the young minds and also to impress upon them that politics, far from being the exclusive domain of a few, is in fact a universal tool for change in any functioning society.
Political way of thought and political mechanisms should be introduced in institutions where there are students- the best e.g. is educational institutes. again, i repeat, this does not mean indoctrinating students into existing political streams of thought. Campus elections and politics do exist, but these are limited to a few states and cities; and serve more as recruiting grounds for political parties. Campus politics should be taken just as seriously as is required to give student’s a political turn of mind – in short, campus politics should be made fun and a learning exercise in politics.
A practical experience of political dynamics will ensure that the youth develop a spirit of socio-political responsibility so that they are ready to fulfill their roles in the country’s political context in whatever capacity.
@ Sanjeev,
You are true that Lok Paritrana had lots of issues that the team could not get handle on. The cited the example on how i dont beleive it is possible for new political parites or organisation to bring about a change in the system.
I am happy for you and your fteam in FTI for trying to put together a team. It is a start, unless the team gets backing from the people of India, i am afraid even FTI cant brign about the changes that is required in the system.
Hence my contention was, it is nice to be part of the FTI team and doing good work, but for FTI to become a political entity it would take a long time, as time is the prime importance to us. Hence my beleif that is best for youth to get elected first through regular political parties and then solowly bring abaout the changes that is required. Those who do get elected can always tap into FTI’s hard work in brining about systematic changes.
Also, i dont want to sound too negative here, we need to respect all the efforts to pull together in makign youth engage in politics. Let us not be agressive in write orbituaries yet. As FTI still needs to get the backing from the larger sections of the society!!!
Further on your take on Nehruvian philosophy – i think it has become of facy for right wing and Left wing thinkers to criticize Nehru and only by doing so they can get a hearing!!!
I strongly disagree with your views that Nehruvian philosophy. Because on balance (accepting there were some major short commings) his contribution to Independent India is positive. Today if India is respected for its democratic principles and institutions we need to credit Nehru and his team and also without Sardar Patel in conjunction with Nehru, todays India woudl not have been the same.
Today there may be scope to paint Nehru’s philiosophy as a limiting factor in India’s growth. But his legacy and philosophy needs to be judged on the back on the then geo social, political and economical situation when India gained Independence, without takign that into factor his legacy cant be ridiculed by those you hav ehardly contributed to India in any shape or from (no offense meant here to any who criticise Nehru and his philosophy). Hence i would suggest not to show any dis-respect in any shape or form.
On Salaries for MPs and MLA’s: This is a very relative question, It all deepends if you want to enter politics to serve people or to make money? The life style aspect is the key here. I dont see any problem with the current package being paid to MPs and MLAs (I do understand that the current salaries are on the lower side) it is not the salry that they earn monthly, but put into it the DA/TA and also their family sustainace is possible to a descent standard.
There is no point in comparing it to corporate salaries, which i think i majority sectors in India is any how on the better side!!
I totally agrees on your below comments
“I have always advocated NEVER giving up one’s job or income sources. Politics must be just another thing that good citizens do. IF voted to represent people, give up the job, else NOT.”
On the issue of NREGA – I agree with you on one level that market forces should play and at the another level, in the short time until there is an evolution of market forces which will create a new order – the immediate downsides need to be addressed – what i call as a correction system. I have seen how NREGA has done wonders to ppl in the village, it is not free meals in any way or shape. But sadly the scheme per say has been grosly missused in states like MP, UP, Bihar..and other states like TN, Karnataka and AP.
The whole concept of economic difference between right of centre and and left of centre is marginal in Indian context (same for the rest of the world). The difference is in priositisation, but both have similar intentions!!
There some great responses here to the Town Hall discussions and no doubt many of the suggestions are worthy of application or at least being given a try.
It is generous of the contributors to include the grey of hair but youthful of mind in their categorization. However those of advanced years
have done just that-advanced beyond and further towards the setting sun of their years. However Youth should mean -THE YOUTH i.e young people. If middle India is predominantly youth ful then that should be the target group since they can make a difference if suitably primed.
A project of this order …changing the level of play in Indian Politics demands a strategic plan on all levels and not just for a five year plan BUT for a 30 year plan( i.e a generation). This strategic plan can be broken down into five year segments.
The strategy could ,and should encompass ALL walks of Indian life- primary ,secondary and tertiary education, the science, arts,the family , the villages, the urban areas,the media , business ( both big and small), the Army ,the economy both industrial and agrarian
educating and facilitating its members to take an interest in politics….. Is’n’t there such an organization already? And if there is can we not work with them?
Dear Ashwin,
Thanks for your comments.
Re: your view that: “I strongly disagree with your views that Nehruvian philosophy. Because on balance (accepting there were some major short commings) his contribution to Independent India is positive. Today if India is respected for its democratic principles and institutions we need to credit Nehru and his team and also without Sardar Patel in conjunction with Nehru, todays India woudl not have been the same.”
There was a HUGE difference between Patel and Nehru. No doubt Nehru’s contributions to India’s democracy were excellent, but he (and his Godchildren) destroyed India’s economy.
What this means is clear: Indian youth is not one homogenous group. You can’t have a ‘Youth political movement’. Ideology is critical. Youth should start their own different groups. For instance, you can’t join FTI since you are effectively defending socialism. That is a dangerous creed! Destroys wealth and harms millions. So you would need to start your own platform. Then let the people of India decide what they want.
Second, Re: “is best for youth to get elected first through regular political parties and then solowly bring abaout the changes that is required.”
I’m afraid that anyone who is even slightly touched by existing political parties (major ones like Congress/BJP etc.) is SO BADLY CONTAMINATED with black money and corruption that I would not associate with them even in Hell. To clear muck one doesn’t become part of muck.
You touch black money once and you are finished for life. You lose all credibility FOR EVER. And India needs good people, not people who deal with black money. Let’s be clear on this please. That is also one more reason why FTI is not for you (if you believe that dabbling with black money is acceptable!). It demands total integrity. We have a stringent Code of Conduct.
In my view India needs a new political culture and that means entirely new political parties. FTI needs good people who believe in freedom, to assemble. If you believe in freedom, and in total integrity, then consider joining FTI. Else you are an enemy of India and FTI members will oppose you politically.
Regards
Sanjeev
@ Sanjeev,
Is difference of opinion not good for democracy to flourish? Though they had differneces they worked towards one goal of establishing a strong independent India.
On your comments of Nehru’s and his god childern destroyed India’s economy – again this is a very loose comment to make. I agree there was a slow growth, but on the flip side also understand there was a sense of bringing various groups into one Indian main stream. Economy can play a role only if there is an identity of a nation. What use of having a economy if there is no sense of ownership.
I dont want to defend socialism here, it is wrong to brand Nehru’s philosophy as mere socialism. He rather strieved for a idealistic future. I hope behind the veil of free markets your thoughts are not contaminated, but in reality you want tio create a new class of society. Also i hope it does not lead to survival of the fittest and the rest perish!!!
On your comments that i cant join FTI – my journey and passion to serve the people which will eventually join main stream politics is rather far more ingrained and based on reality, that i am not dependent on FTI for me to reach my destination. All i can say is those who live in glass houses should not try to throw stones on nehibhours glass house?
I am not sure what to make of your views, i wish you all the best and hope you are not living in some sort of a unrealistic world, as this could be dangerous for FTI and its members. I sense a streak of non -inclusiveness in your thougt process, this fundementally has an impact of creating a unified new society. If what you have talked of FTI is ture, i am not sure, i would want to join FTI in ant shape or form.
Without diverting from the subject, all i can do is wish you best – as your route to bring changes, dont go down the route of Lok Paritrana, as by not including majority of the society you cant create a new society!!!
Cheers
Ashwin
Ramkumari, Sanjeev, Pongo and Ashwin: Thanks for some very thoughtful points and for continuing the discusssion…
Am a little tied up today but hope to respond soon.
@ Sanjeev,
Just to clarify – society should be at the centre of the revolution. Aims of creating an enviornment is important where free market rules do apply and play squarely is the key for future. This does not mean socialism which is more towards free meals!!!
@ ramkumari: Thanks for sharing your thoughts…You are absolutely right re. “..how pressing it is to take action NOW…….
***
@ Sanjeev: Thanks..This could not have happened without the enthusiastic participation of the panellists and the audience and the brilliant team at Offstumped.in in particular centerofright.
It is indeed critical to NOT GIVE UP! And as you succinctly put it: “So easy it is to give up. I know from experience.â€
But I am hopeful.
***
@ pongo: I agree with “– things could go badly awry…” and that is why I feel the urgency to engage this segment and channelise the huge energy and enthusiasm in this demographic to the betterment of Bharat.
You are right that such mobilization need not happen within the confines of existing parties/set-up.
You suggested “A practical experience of political dynamics” Any other ideas/suggestions (apart from involvement in campus politics?)
***
@ Ashwin: Thanks for sharing your thoughts – and for participating in the online discussion.
I do not fully support your views on Nehru. I believe the major part of the blame for the situation that we find ourselves in today can be put at his door.
By the way, a healthy criticism does not/should not imply disrespect.
I also disagree on your take re. salaries. Unless the “work” pays at least some comparable to what one deserves, you will end up getting either the mediocre (but possibly well-to-do) or the not-so-well-to-do (and mediocre) who are out to increase their net worth. Politics and governance is a serious matter, that needs capable leaders…it should not be considered as a charitable cause.
Don’t you think?
***
@ ramkumari: I am not aware of the kind of broad organisation that you mentioned that can encourage youngsters to take an interest in active politics…Do you have any ideas?
***
Thanks All. Look forward to more thoughts.
@ Shantanu,
I understand and apperciate the criticisms directed at Nehru today. On hindsight everything everyone can pass judgements. But when making remarks on personaalities such as Nehur, i bet he himself would have welcomed criticisms. But to bllantly just say he is the root cause of every problem in india is a bit of an exxageragation. And i also would challenge the fact that no contemporary of Nehru howmuch ever he or she disagreed with him would paint so negatively. One needs to choose words carefully when making criticisms.
Major part of the blame for situation that we find ourself is not in Nehru but the generation born post Indian independence and also on the entire political machinery which never was sereious in “implementation of policies or schemes” along with moral bankruptancy in the society that we are seeing in the last 3-4 decades./
Re salaries, i did say that there can be revisions, but i am not sure of bringing drastic changes. In Indian context the perks for an MP or an MLA is sufficient to lead a very descent upper middle class lifestyle – which is relatively a good position when compared to majority of indians. Why have a representative who does not understand or represent the larger economic fabric of india.
Those whp want to increase their lifestyle can do so either by judiciously saving/investing their monies and or work outside the system!!
Eventually let us not forget, politicians and those aspiring to brign about a change in the political system, need to be supported by the large sections of the society and they are merely representatives rather than being any superior!!
What i do find Shantanu, is teams like FTI, Bharat Uday Mission and others need and should go in midst of ppl rather than sitting in drawing rooms discussing the next best system to put in place. They should spend time in understanding the problem of majority rather than a minority of their ilk. Unless there is widespread acceptance for your thoughts all the best ideas would not really bear fruit.
I am sayign this with my personal experience of having run, helped run or being part of the campaigning process and having seen with rather too close quartes for comfort!! Hence the reality check kicks in me all the time when there is a talk of change rather drastic changes!!!
Majority of India, when pushed woudl talk more about their day to day issues rather than strategic issues. Dont you think only if the day to day issues are sorted or can be safely handled would the majority participate in the more strategic issues concerning society and nation?
3 things
1. a sure way of losing youngsters is converting every debate into a mutual bashing session.
2. what does it matter that we isolate and identify exactly what role nehru played in the destructionor glory of india becasue both sides agree that now, the way forward is in the free market.
3. is this thread discussing how to bring youngsters into politics?
thank you
Anand
@ Ashwin: Let us move on from Nehru, salaries etc…these are but minor matters of disagreement in the grand scheme of things..so while agreeing to disagree, let us discuss instead, how to get “widespread acceptance for your thoughts” and how to get the “day to day issues sorted”.
These are I think the key challenges…that of generating awareness (#1) and getting popular support behind core issues (#2).
***
@ Anand: Thank you for smartly bringing me(us?) back on track! Did you participate in the online discussion? If yes,I am keen to hear your feedback. If not, what are your thoughts on “how to bring youngsters into politics?”
I am “schizo” you have included inputs from me in your summaries.
on twitter http://twitter.com/uberschizo
thank you for prompt action 🙂
anand/schizo/uberschizo
@ Shantanu,
I agree with you on prioritising the issues:
The reason i strongly beleive that new teams cant be effective to brign about a change in the political process of the India are as follows:
1. New team needs to get approval of the people of India
2. New team needs to build a pan India image and acceptance at various levels.
The above points are not impossible all by themself, but rather take a long time to materialise, but timing is of essence and i am not sure another generation of Indians should go without contributing to the process of change. Hence the intent to serve the country is important and to minimise the issue of time lost, they can get elected and move up the ladder through existing political parties and in their own fashion and shape start ushering the process of change.
Further one cant really expect handful of individulas to bring about changes, BUT what they could certainly do is bring about awareness and also in their sphere of influence initiate the seeds of changes, which will have a roll of effect on the rest of the region or sector.
Also the main stream political parties have good individulas who have the intent, but may not have the drive to bring about the change. These individuals can be easily mobilised and if we can strengthen them and their political movement, the objective of ushering changes can kick start… then all it requires (not trivalising) is sustaining the need for change and making inroads into the minds and hearts of the larger sections of the society for the real need for change and more crucially on the timing.
For larger sections of the society to take torch bearers of change seriously they need to get elected at the least and gain some acceptance, else all the efforts of good intent and hard work put together by teams such as FTI, Bharat Uday Mission and others would not really materialise.
Hence my view on having individuals of good intent be supported to get elected so there can be a new breed of political class who can work from within the system who can actively campaign and support the cause.
@ Anand (#18): I had not forgotten about your question re. “how to bring youngsters into politics?”
I think (at least) two things need to happen so that more youngsters can be enthused about politics.
One, “good” people need to be consciously (this is important) and deliberately seen to move into political activism and take very “political” stances. This is happening – albeit at a very limted scale at the moment (a few examples that come to mind are the folks behind Hamara Congress and Friends of BJP, not to mention the nascent political movements such as FTI, Loksatta, PPI, BhUMi etc; and to a lesser extent, Janaagraha)
Two, there should be channels/platform/mechanisms that enable “active” youngsters to voice their opinion, views and thoughts on policies and strategic challenges without a] being shouted down and b] being ignored.
The second is very important. Otherwise the “interested” youngsters can pretty quickly become disenchanted and turn cynical.
What do you think?
***
@ Ashwin: I agree with you that the challenges facing the new political groupings are humungous. But I am not giving up hope (just yet) and I do not think such efforts are futile. No doubt some of the new groups will not survive the next decade. Some might merge with existing parties. But the efforts will not have been in vain. Because in their own little way, these groups and organisations are raising the bar in Indian politics and definitely helping generate political consciousness.
As you have pointed out, the biggest challenge is “making inroads into the minds and hearts of the larger sections of the society for the real need for change”
Of ocurse, “individuals of good intent” can always be supported depending on what they stand for and what their views are.
I am away for a few days and it may be a while before I can comment further on this discussion.
That should not stop others from sharing their thoughts 🙂
http://itsmyworld.blogspot.com/2011/07/what-we-can-do.html