What is “Dharma”? – Guest Post by Harapriya

Dear All: It is my pleasure to publish this guest post on “Dharma” by K Harapriya. I will be posting this in three parts. At the outset, I am grateful to her for a very well articulated exposition of a difficult concept. Please read and share widely. Today, a definition of “Dharma” and the role of Itihaasa in the Hindu value system (formatting and emphasis is mine).

*** What is “Dharma”? by K Harapriya ***

mahabharat

In the last great battle of the Kurukshetra war, Bhima is engaged in a fight to death with the wicked Duryodhana, whose greed and jealousy alone were responsible for the entire war.  After many days of fighting, a bruised and tired Bhima looks over at Krishna, the spiritual guide of the righteous Pandavas. While the rightful king Yudhishtra, the embodiment of dharma, who has staked the kingdom on the outcome of this fight, looks on, Krishna taps his thigh. The hint is to do the unthinkable, to break the warrior code and hit Duryodhana below his waist where he is weakest. Bhima does exactly that, Duryodhana is killed, and the battle is won.  Was this dharmic?  What is dharma? Is it worth preserving?  More importantly, is it even possible to have a dharma yudh (righteous war) against the forces of adharma?

Multi-layered definition of dharma

Sanatana Dharma, also known as Hinduism, has been described as a religion or a family of religions. It has a common thread of beliefs including the belief in karma and samsara, and the belief in the Vedas as pramana (a means of knowledge).  However, there is an even more basic principle which connects all the branches and beliefs of Hinduism and unites all Hindus.  This is the concept of dharma.

Dharma is the single uniting theme which informs Hindu beliefs and can be considered the foundation on  which Hinduism rests. It is defined as  “ that which upholds”.

In common parlance, it has multiple meanings depending on the context used.  It means duty (one’s obligations and responsibilities);   the right action in a given situation;    that which is in conformity with Rta (God’s /Natural laws); and also one’s religious role. Dharma is the first of the four purusharthas (the goals of man). It is followed by artha, kama and  moksha.  However, none of the other three are considered legitimate if one pursued them without reference to dharma. Artha (prosperity/security) obtained without reference to dharma is considered a crime.  Kama (pleasure) pursued without reference to dharma is considered debauchery. As for moksha, the adharmi could go nowhere near it.

Mere duty or righteous action does not, however, explain the depth of word.  Dharma exists within the Hindu world-view at several levels.  There is individual dharma, Svadharma,   which pertains to individual action which is undertaken to satisfy individual needs.  Within Hindu thought, desire and ambitions were not considered sinful or wrong and individuals were encouraged to satisfy their needs and desires through righteous actions.

Then, there is the dharma pertaining to family, society and the nation.   The concept of duty changes according to the situation and there is a clear precedent in deciding the correct course of action when there  is a conflict in the roles one plays.  Thus, duty to oneself is subordinated to one’s duty to family; one’s duty to one’s own family is subordinated to one’s duty to one’s community; and one’s duty to one’s own community is subordinated to one’s duty to the nation.

Dharma was further defined in terms of caste or community. Caste identities did not only refer to religious practices but also vocational practices.    Caste and community based dharma reveals the true pragmatic nature of the Hindu world-view.  For Hindus, values need not be universal (held by all members of society or pertaining to all situations).   By that,   Hindus understand that a value may be held by the majority of people at a given time, but it does not necessarily hold true for all times or all communities.  Thus,  ahimsa (nonviolence)  was a value that was held important.  It is extolled in the Mahabharata and in the Thirukkural.  Yet, there were communities, such as the Kshatriyas, who were entrusted with protecting society and had to use force  for this purpose.  Likewise, while religious texts like the Vedanta scorned material wealth and possessions, there were communities engaged in businesses and trade who were considered important for the economic prosperity of the entire nation—this then was their dharma

Since the concept of Dharma accommodated different life paths and practices, determining what Dharma is, in a given situation becomes very important to the Hindu.

Role of Ithihasa in Hindu values

Since the right course of action has to be determined according to dharma (righteousness) and the present situation, Hindus have throughout the ages pondered on how to determine what dharma is.  One of the primary teaching methods used has been the oral transmission of Ithihaasa and the Puranas.  Within the Hindu tradition though, only the Ramayana and the Mahabharata are considered Ithihaasa (historic). These two epics consider the life events of specific individuals and allow the reader to glean insight from the characters of these stories and their lives and situations.  The purpose of Ithihaasa is to teach the individual and the community how to determine what dharma is and how to act on it.  Our epics have played a central role in presenting us with paradigms in the form of characters whose behaviour and conflicts mirror our own situation.   Even though the stories are of a different time, we see that in our epics, the characters are motivated by the same desires that govern us— the desire for wealth, fame, pleasure, status and finally liberation.  The characters in these epics have choices in their actions and choices in how to respond to their own desires.

*** End of Part I ***

Tomorrow: Lessons of the Mahabharat (Part II)

Related Posts:

A humble attempt at understanding “Dharma” – Part I

Understanding Raj-Dharma

B Shantanu

Political Activist, Blogger, Advisor to start-ups, Seed investor. One time VC and ex-Diplomat. Failed mushroom farmer; ex Radio Jockey. Currently involved in Reclaiming India - One Step at a Time.

You may also like...

10 Responses

  1. Hrishi says:

    Firstly, I must thank K Harapriya (and Shantanu) for this scholarly rendition of this critical but confusing concept which is foundational to being a Hindu.

    I will stick my neck out and say – that with so many varying and paradoxical meanings being given to one word or concept “dharma” – the word/concept has been beggared of any practical use and has outlived its usefulness – any scoundrel who knows within himself that he lies, or worse still any pathological mind who actually believes his untruthfulness can claim convincingly to be dharmic and practitioners of the Dharma

    Its my fervent hope that at the end of the three parts of this treatise some clarity and convergence on what is dharma and what is not – will emerge.

    Take ahimsa for example – I would propose that non-violence if understood and practiced at the level of the ‘why’ could be the credo of the warrior! He implements his values of non-violence even as he may outwardly fight and kill or injure his adversary – but his action was that of a dispassionate samurai and not of a hate-filled, mentally upset idealogue
    Similarly, commitment to material wealth and economic prosperity – if ‘why’ I take actions to improve my own and organization’s economic lot is because I understand and see the benefits of it and not because I chase wealth/power/name-fame/sex through it to be happy – then I am renounced and free even as I may be the biggest capitalist or economic player

    This would mean that dharma is eternal in its essence and not simply the same as morals and rules and codes of social conduct that change from time to time and situation to situation depending on ever-changing norms of acceptable behavior.

    Dharma (from what I understand from this article’s First Part) means:
    – duty as per one’s natural profile (in terms of guna’s I presume)
    – values
    – right action – as per laws and roles and hierarchy of roles

    One more point – it would be useful to look at many of concepts raised like karma, desire etc from two perspectives viz.
    – from pov of spirituality
    – from pov of engaging in worldly action
    e.g. karma in worldly action means cause and effect while spiritually it means getting attached and distracted from reality; fulfilling desire means fulfilling needs required to live, thrive and evolve in worldly life whilst it means depending on pleasure and its maximization for happiness from the pov of spirituality – this for me clarifies the confusion!

  2. Kaffir says:

    =>
    Take ahimsa for example – I would propose that non-violence if understood and practiced at the level of the ‘why’ could be the credo of the warrior! He implements his values of non-violence even as he may outwardly fight and kill or injure his adversary – but his action was that of a dispassionate samurai and not of a hate-filled, mentally upset idealogue
    =>

    So not just the action, but the underlying thought or the motivation for that action is also significant, correct?

  3. B Shantanu says:

    Hrishi, Kaffir: Thanks for sharing your thoughts…I will let Harapriya respond. Please wait for the second and third parts later this week… Thanks.

  4. Bharat says:

    Please see Swami Chandrashekarendra Saraswati’s views on a/himsa.
    http://www.hindudharmaforums.com/archive/index.php?t-974.html

    “Some of the delegates wanted to ask questions to Swamiji. When he said yes, the very first question that came was “Is sacrificial killing in Vedic Yajnas justified? Is it not a sin?”

    SwamigaL said, “Yes, it can be done, it is not a sin!”

    At this reply, they all suddenly laughed. Menan was angry that they had insulted the sage. He told them, “I brought you to this sage to seek his blessings. Had I known you would behave with such indecency, I would not have ventured at this task.”

    SwamigaL pacified Menan. “Don’t be angy with them! They have come with a premeditated resolution. They have concluded that jIva himsa is a sin and it should not be done for any reason. Since my reply was contrary to their conclusion, they had this laugh. They never had any thought of insulting me. We should reply to them in the proper manner.”

    As Menan’s anger subsided, SwamigaL continued: “A rowdy kills a man. A law court inquires the incident and a judge gives him a sentence of death. The rowdy committed the sin of killing, say in a fit of passion, with no idea of sin and spiritual rewards. Then isn’t it a jIva himsa to give him a death sentence? Do we blame the judge for this action?”

    These words from SwamigaL sent them into thinking. After all, they were learned people. Sensing some interesting exposition of truths, they waited eagerly for the next words from Swamiji.

    SwamigaL continued: “In a junction of four roads, an ambulance comes first. Since the vehicle is for saving a life, we stop all other vehicles and permit it to pass first. On another occasion, an ambulance and a fire engine come on the road. We let the fire engine pass at the cost of saving one life, because the fire engine is rushing to save many lives. On a third occasion, a fire engine and a military van in an emergency come up. What do we do now? We let the military van go first since the life of a country assumes more importance than the lives of a few people. At such a time, we don’t think of voluntarily sacrificing the lives of a few people in the city for the sake of the country.

  5. Shyam says:

    Can I have the 2nd 3rd part please?

  6. Uma says:

    Great post. thanks to Harapriya and Shantanu! It gave a lot of clarity on Dharma and Itihaasa as it becomes easier to understand and explain to the younger generation.

    @ Bharath! Wonderful and thought provoking post on Chandrasekharendra Saraswati Swamiji.

    Eagerly waiting for parts 2 and 3

  7. ramesh says:

    *** COMMENT EDITED ***

    Dharma is that set of rules which ultimately and anyhow (including apparently adharmic way-a great contradiction indeed but true) brings about the ultimate welfare (Kalyan) to the individual and the society (via- dharma-artha-kam-moksha etc)


    Therefore my friends we first need Jnanies who define Dharma (policies in todays context) and who create the power (the King, the government in todays context) and then we need the Kings (Political Leaders) who will run the government based on that Dharma (policies). That is my essence. Thus Politics base itself on the Dharma. How is it then that it can ever be separated from Dharma. Only in present days when there is a gross distortion of the Dharma and to avoid its misuse, talk of separating dharma from politics is being made. For this reason it can never be a lasting solution.

    Dear Shantanu,

    The subject of Jnana is so vital and fundamental that it may need separate blog for discussion. Without this however discussions, debate are made about the dharma, politics, morale …..etc which are all the products of the Jnana alone can never bear the desired and long lasting fruits. How do you think?

    *** NOTE by MODERATOR ***

    Pl keep your comment short and to the point. If the commment is long, pl post it on your blog/site and provide a URL instead. Thank you.

  8. ramesh says:

    The comment by me at sl 9 is a modified by the moderator. The one may not get the right idea of what I commented. So read the full comment on

    http://idealworldkrishna.blogspot.com/

    Thanks.

  1. February 10, 2010

    […] Source: What is “Dharma”? – Guest Post by Harapriya […]