On meetings, secret reports and good neighbours

Even as “normalisation ” of relations with Pakistan continues apace (meeting of leaders in Russia, followed by Foreign Minister’s meeting in Italy followed by a meeting of Foreign Secretaries sometime soon, likely to be followed by another meeting of PMs in Egypt in July) courtesy BBC, comes this disturbing bit of news (emphasis mine):

Militant groups banned in Pakistan are expanding operations and recruitment in Pakistani-run Kashmir, according to a government report seen by the BBC.

The observations are from a detailed secret report submitted to the region’s government on the groups’ activities in the city of Muzaffarabad and elsewhere.

Pakistan banned the groups in 2002 after an attack on India’s parliament brought the two states close to war.

…It finds that three banned groups – Harkatul Mujahideen, Jaish-e-Mohammad and Lashkar-e-Taiba – are active in Muzaffarabad.

Harkatul Mujahideen and Jaish-e-Mohammad are said to be planning to open madrassas, or Islamic schools, in the city where Lashkar-e-Taiba is already operating a madrassa.

…The report also elaborates how the militant groups are growing in size and number across Kashmir.

…It then goes on to say that the authorities should take up the matter with the intelligence agency responsible for the militants*.

The report says officials from that agency should relocate the militants to some area near the border, otherwise clashes with locals could take place.

The report’s contents are astonishing, as they come at a time when Pakistan’s security forces are involved in a fully fledged operation against the Taliban.

…Jaish-e-Mohammad has been involved in several assassination attempts on top Pakistani officials, including former President Pervez Musharraf.

Its members were also responsible for the kidnapping and murder of Wall Street journalist Daniel Pearl, and are said to have carried out the attack on the Indian parliament.

…Lashkar-e-Taiba remains the prime suspect in the Mumbai attacks and is India’s enemy number one.

Despite the fact that the groups mentioned are banned under Pakistan’s terrorism act, the report does not advocate any action against them other than to keep an eye on their activities**.

In case you had forgotten, Lashkar-e-Taiba has been directly implicated in the Mumbai attack and earlier this month, its founder, Hafiz Mohammad Saeed was released by a court in Pakistan , citing lack of evidence.

In the meantime, we continue to replay empty messages:

Mr Tharoor said Dr Singh’s message to Mr Zardari was: ‘Take necessary steps in your own country to bring to book those who perpetrated these horrors on our soil and then give us enough assurance for your own conduct that we will not have to fear this again.’

Sigh.

***

Related Posts:

Is India prepared for an imploding Pakistan?

Waiting for a “fitting reply”*

The nonsense about “non-state actors”

We know its Pakistan but we hope its not!

and the whole category of Pakistan-related posts

* This is probably as close as one gets to an official admission of ISI’s involvement in terrorism against India.

** This raises (once again) the question about Pakistan’s seriousness in tackling terrorism against India.

*** UPDATE ***

I am traveling until the 10th of July with very limited internet access. There will be some delay before I am able to respond to (and moderate) comments.

Thank you for your patience and understanding.

***

Pl. note that if you do not enter your email address while leaving a comment, it is very likely to get stuck in the moderation/spam queue.

To avoid this, pl. enter a valid email address OR use this email address instead: satyacomment AT gmail.com

Email addresses are not published on the site.

B Shantanu

Political Activist, Blogger, Advisor to start-ups, Seed investor. One time VC and ex-Diplomat. Failed mushroom farmer; ex Radio Jockey. Currently involved in Reclaiming India - One Step at a Time.

You may also like...

8 Responses

  1. AG says:

    I repeat.
    Things are the way they are because that is the way we (collectively) want them to be.

    Shishi Tharoor’s landslide win in the LS elections underscores that his lily livered position is a projection of the lily-liveredness of his constituency.

    Most of us *KNOW* what the solution to terrorism is. The problem is we cannot even *contemplate* taking action out of fear and for the consequences of the action.

    No point in your and my sighing.

  2. Dirt Digger says:

    AG,
    Your statement (is true from a hindsight principle) is very karmic philosophically. The destiny of a nation can be changed if people take action, which is a strong reason why these discussions are happening today in various forums. While Indians are famous for gossiping without taking action, we are questioning the people in charge as opposed to the earlier days when our leaders could lose a war and get away free.

  3. संदीप नारायण शेळ्के says:

    It is true that the “A government is an impersonation of its citizens” so lets change ourselves.
    We can bring change to the society by making the resolution today
    “We will not tolerate any corruption henceforth and abide to the constitution of Republic of India”
    Lets take the initiative to become a leader by engaging ourselves in activities initiated by FTI like groups.

    Lets rise out of the dormancy we have been living for long now. Lets decide that our next generations will be proud of us for our work and will curse like we do.

    Lets challenge the unethical and unconstitutional by participating in the active politics.

    Lets unite and show the world the oldest on the earth are still the best.

    No mud slinging can save us, we have to correct what is wrong and uphold the good one.

    Lets say together, “I Love My Country and Will Make A More Lovable One”

    Jai Hind!!

  4. संदीप नारायण शेळ्के says:

    [correction in above reply]

    “Lets rise out of the dormancy we have been living for long now. Lets decide that our next generations will be proud of us for our work and will *not* curse like we do.”

    forgot the *not* word.

    Jai Hind!!

  5. AG says:

    > we are questioning the people in charge as opposed to the earlier days when our leaders could lose a war and get away free

    Does not seem to be working.
    After all, MMS and co got an even bigger mandate.
    And they’ve lost every war they’ve been asked to find: economic, political or otherwise.

    Sorry for being a cynic, but after looking for bright spots, i simply cannot find any.

  6. AG says:

    typo:
    they’ve lost every war they’ve been asked to FIGHT

  7. B Shantanu says:

    From Tavleen Singh’s “What’s the point in talking to Pakistan?”

    India will not talk to Pakistan as long as its government continues to nurture and shield those who attack India. Why is it so hard for us to say this? Why is it so hard for us to tell the visiting American Secretary of State that it is not possible to speak to people who talk about fighting against Islamist terrorism but openly support an Islamist reptile like Hafiz Mohammed Sayeed.

  8. B Shantanu says:

    Re. Tavleen Singh’s question above: Why is it so hard for us to say this?”, apparently it is not so hard:

    We won’t re-start dialogue with Pakistan unless there is progress in Pakistan’s actions,” said Menon

    or is it?

    I am now thoroughly confused