‘Recitation of Vande Mataram against Islam’…
From The Indian Express, as reported by PTI:
“There are some lines in Vande Mataram which go against our religion,” Jilani said. However, Muslims had no problem in reciting the National Anthem, Jana gana mana, he said.
All India Muslim united Morcha vice-president M Asiddique also denounced the move, saying the recitation of Vande Mataram was “against Islam”.
He said Muslims could under no circumstances allow their children to recite the song.
Another AIMPLB member, Khalid Rashid Firangi Mahali, aired similar views and demanded scrapping of the move.
Unbelievable – what more can I say?
Thanks to Kanchan for pointing me in the direction of this newsreport from Times of India in June ’06 about a fatwa to Muslims in Hyderabad asking “Muslims not to admit their children in schools where Vande Mataram is sung every morning. Children who are already studying in such institutions must be immediately shifted to other schools, the fatwa ordered.”
Apparently, several Muftis in Hyderabad, “including the All-India Sunni Ulema Board president Moulana Syed Shah Badruddin Qadri Aljeelani, Moulana Mohammed Hasnuddin, Moulana Mohammed Mastan Ali, Nazima Aziz and Rizwana Zarreen of Jamiat–ul–Mominath, jointly issued the fatwa when some parents approached them seeking a shariah ruling on Vande Mataram. Several schools in the city start their day with a recital of the national song. “Vande Mataram was written by Bankim Chandra Chatterjee.”
Related Post:
one can guage the courage that these muslims living in India have acquired due to pampering done by our blind ,selfish politicians that they refuse to praise the motherland which feeds them . to be unfaithfulness is in their koran , unfaithful towards their country, towards their neighbours ,towards everything which is not islamic.u give them shelter thinking them to be poor,innocent , in next move they will throw u out of your home as is exemplified to them by their prophet . they make the world hear that they are being slaughtered, terrorised due to their big mouths , but actually it is the reverse as happened in kashmir and is still continuing . they are enjoying to their full water ,fresh air ,subsidies , beauty of kashmir ,without any kashmiri hindu whom they were successfully able to throw out . thanks to our so called anti hindu ,pseudo secular politicians .if hindus of other parts of the country wont understand their plans , there will be repetion of kashmir as they are increasing in population at a very fast rate and our politicians because of vote bank are blindly supporting them at the cost of their nation .
don,t pity them , it is a very very dangerous cult because the only book that they follow -koran teaches them only hate ,murder and domination over non muslims.
from a kashmiri hindu
I agree with Sushma but alas we cannot do anything we are helpless. Nothing can be done. We Hindus are immature with confused mind, we lack right approach. See now Arjun sing is totally acting selfish favouring his vote bank. And morever he wants to fund madrassa. On what basis? when they are not ready to sing vande matram. Why to fund them?. Frankly speaking we Hindus don’t know when to love and when to not, when to pamper when to not. Only God can save us now. We all must include prayers to protect us from this cult to our dieties during our prayer. If we really take help of our God and Godesses they will definitly help us sooner or later. Beleive me. In next comment i will include my experince and result which i prayed to our God. I am secular i pray Jesus, Buddha, and many god but definitely not allha.
Dear Sushma and Indi,
Thanks for your comments. I share your sentiments and feelings…and I dont have any easy answers either.
But inaction is NOT an option. At the very least, each one of us can strive to become better informed, more aware and be armed with facts and figures so that we can confront blind pseudo-secularists and their one-sided propoganda.
Like you, I am also searching for solutions but a beginning must be made…my essays are a humble and modest step in this direction.
All I would say, is DO SOMETHING and DO NOT GIVE UP…There wil be light at the end of this tunnel…but we need to keep faith and stay firm.
Muslims can never be faithful to any country, they are faithfull only to their global brotherhood called “The Umma”, that’s why they are menance everywhere where they live.
…
To refuse to sing a national song is an indirect refusal to accept the nation in which they live.
Note: Comment has been edited by B Shantanu
Ganesh,
Please be careful with your comments. I understand your anger but we need to focus on pragmatic and sensible approaches.
I have come across an article on Times of India website and would like to share with u all that shows the loyality of this community to the country they live in. All secular hindus and people who “LOVE INDIA AND ARE SYMPATHETIC TO THEM IN PARTICULAR” pls.do read it once to see how much they value India.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1629373.cms
They r telling their coming generations as well to chose religion over the country.
i agree with you shantanu when pragmatism and sensibile approaches are alien concepts to a stupid religion, it needs to be weeded out
The entire nation is preparing to celebrate the centenary of adopion of “Vande Mataram” on September 7, 2006.Once again the cronies and mercenaries like Imam Bukhari, handpicked and deployed as Muslim leaders by the Nehru-Gandhi dynasty have drawn another Islamic LOC between the poor Indian Muslims and their Hindu brothers by declaring it as against Islamic beliefs.These are the biggest bandicoots who colluded with congress and laid the foundation for vote bank and Muslim appeasement politics.
Thanks for Ayodhya and Advani factor which gave a loud slap on the face of these so called Muslim leaders and shook the Muslim masses to wakeup from their deep slumber.Unfortunately,Advani lost his vision down the line and espoused the pseudo-democratic polity.A great opportunity to turn the Indian Muslims against the Islamists and stepout of the Islamic LOC was lost.
This is a national song and the slogan “Vande Mataram” was the national cry against the British Raj.This is the first successful weapon against suppression which became a nightmare for the British Raj. Muslims can omit those lines referring to “worshipping the motherland” and our Hindu brothers understand our faith more than anybody else.Indian Muslims should wakeup and stop believing that there is a large wealthy Muslim nation with big oil tycoons waiting to embarce and shower them with fortunes.We must learn to love and respect our motherland.
This is a golden opportunity for the Indian Muslims to chop off their umbilical cord with the mullahs and integrate in to the mainstream. On 7th September,the Muslim masses should come out in large numbers nationwide declaring themselves as “Warriors against terror” and should shout the slogan “Vande Mataram” as a strategic deterrent against the Islamists and anti-muslim establishments.They can kill two birds with one stone.Even this can become the platform for their political identity.
One more golden opportunity waiting in front of the Indian muslims.
VANDE MATARAM.
What a great suggestion. I agree with you…It is indeed a fantastic opportunity for the Indian Muslims to demonstrate where their loyalties lie. Unfortunately, it is unlikely to happen.
..its so clear from above mentioned comments…tat muslims are wrongly labeled as xtremists…on the contrary its hindus who r xtremists….tat they force others to worship their deities and follow their philosophy…i thnk vryone has the rght to follow his religion… we cant force muslims to follow our ways…hindus will never awake from their deep slumber..wch is the most basic reason for our contry remaining backward….they follow som bulshit n stupid dogmas and even force minorities to follow suit….only God can save this contry from this foolish cult who can one day sell this contry for political gains….it is muslims who r true patriotic….
@ prince of angels:
Re. your comment: “…tat muslims are wrongly labeled as xtremists…on the contrary its hindus who r xtremists….tat they force others to worship their deities and follow their philosophy…i thnk vryone has the rght to follow his religion…”
please have a look at the post with a link Dr Zakir Naik‘s youtube clip on my site.
He appears to be asking everyone to follow the “philosophy” of Islam.
Also, please give some examples of “Hindus” forcing others to worship their dieties and follow their philosophy.
Vande Mataram is not a religious song. Please read this post to understand what I mean..
I look forward to your comments.
….u told zakir is asking ppl to follow islamic philosophy…asking is dffrnt and enforcing is dffrnt….zakir has complte rght to preach practise n propogate his religion…..its his constituional rght wich he is xercising…who r we to stop him….any preacher wen he is preachng his dogma he will show the benefits of his dogma and ask others to follow it….wats the big deal???….but if certain communities religious policies dsnt permit them to sing some song y anyone shld force them….isnt tis xtremism forcing others to follow ur own dogma???…..i havent come across any incidnt in wch muslims force hindus to com to mosque or read quran or follow their rituals but i have across mny incidnts in wch hindus forcibly apply tikas throw holi powders on muslims and even dstrb their congregational prayers at eid time by doin som mischif and will purposely pick up som quarrel ….but muslims never blame a common hindu for this and blame politics for tat……but in hindus even common ppl spit venom against muslims…..tats y muslims fell in inferiority complex and this effects their sycology….to sch an extent tat they will pick up arms som day against injustices….and this will benefit the terrorists training camps as they get free recruitmnts…..
….as far as vande mataram is concerned….whther it carries any religious point or no is not the criteria…in tat case we have to stdy islam as wel as vande mataram 4 wich we dsnt have tym…the criteria is if som communities religious laws dsnt allow any song to be sung its their personal matter….y shld others have any problem….hindus have so many matters wich r personal…but muslims never force thm for anythng….but if u stil wanna dscuss about the contents of vande mataram….pls note tat islam prohibits its followers to share any quality of the creator wth the creation….to bow or revere or salute is the quality islam reserves only for God….the mening of the wrds BOW, SALUTE, REVERE etc somwer coincides with the term WORSHIP….tats y muslims dnst tch the feet of nyone….muslims dsnt bow bfore their parents also…does tat mean they dntt love or rspct their parents….any muslim be he from saudi or pakistan or iran or iraq will never bow bofre their own motherland….but tis religious dogma is being used against muslims in india for political votebanks jst to make it appear tat muslims r unpatriotic….and common hindu falls in trap…..for ur information india was never a hindu contry xcept may be for a few yrs durng gupta rule tat also wich i doubt….but india was an islamic contry for 1000 yrs and never did wer riots or pogroms against hindus recorded in tat 1000yrs of indian histry…but secularism happnd to com for the past just 50 yrs and we had 100s of riots and injustces against muslims….jst imagin if india wld had been a hindu contry then i dnt knw wat wld had happnd of minorities…..now my question whom do u think is more xtremist….hindu rule or muslim rule????
@ prince of angels: You seem to have a habit of making bold statements without offering much evidence by way of support.
E.g. “….but india was an islamic contry for 1000 yrs…” That is interesting. I did not know that…
Can you please point us to some references?
As for “….jst imagin if india wld had been a hindu contry then i dnt knw wat wld had happnd of minorities…..now my question whom do u think is more xtremist….hindu rule or muslim rule????….”
I think the readers of this blog are sensible and intelligent enough to form their own judgement…
…..wat references u want me to highlght….u can knw it from histry….islamic rule started in india from sultanate….after the defeat of prthviraj chauhan in the battle of tarai……from tat tym till britishers india was islamic state wth its capital at delhi for most of the time of islamic rule….
To prince of angels
Are you an advocate for muslims. Do they need one? Its so dumb when you give reasons for muslim’s inferiority complex. Just look into their holy book, you may also find many other reasons for thier this state of mind. Again all muslims are not suffering form this complexes. Why? Only those who bring religion at everyplaces goes through this your so called complexes. If you are really interested in so called issues you are suggesting on this site on every issues pertaning to Hindu-Muslims you need to go though this site. http://www.faithfreedom.org
Jai Hind!
…indian …if u can be advocate to hindus y cant i be advocate to muslims…i ve gone through their holy books too…i ve visited the site u recommnded but its all total biased and lack reason…
Hi Prince of angel
Really! you have gone through their holybooks and you cannot find anything? That shows you are more biased and lacks reasons in finding the truth. May be you are one of those who are brainwashed.
How much your opinions worths? least care about what you say on all this issues. We have many unbias scholars to judge the issues and we know the truth. Nothing is going to be changed by pampering religion which have caused trouble all over the world due to misintipretation of Holy book. And you also did the same misinterpritation. I have upmost respect for all religion but that doesnot shut my brain to figure out what is right and what is wrong. Brave are those who accepts the faults and try to correct it. Keep that is good throw that is bad.
Jai Hind!
.
….@indian:- u say i ve gone thru holy books and didnt find anything….i can allege u on similar grounds tat even u might had gone thru holy books and didnt find anythng…so its lke abusing each other wich i thnk is simply unsensible and waste of time…accordng to me u lack knowldge of holy books and u r surely brainwashed by religious clerics and also dirty politics…..ofcorse brave are those who can find fault in their ways and may accept others ways….so be brave and accept ur philosophy’s fault and accept the truth…it seems our majority community is vry eager to force muslims to modify the Quranic teachings….wich the muslims will never accept…
@ prince: I am tempted to comment here (against my own better judgement!)
You say: “…ofcorse brave are those who can find fault in their ways and may accept others ways….so be brave and accept ur philosophy’s fault and accept the truth…”
I (and most readers of this blog) accept that the belief system (not philosophy – thats a wrong word) that we call “Hinduism” has been suffering from some distortions and we are working hard to change them…
That said, we believe that a] the truth lies within oursleves and b] everyone is perfectly free to choose his/her own path to salvation/truth.
So I find any preaching of “the only truth” to be hugely condescending and smacking of arrogance.
By the way, are you willing to accept the same thing about Islam? i.e it has “faults” and it should accept “others ways”?
Or since muslims will never accept…”modification” of Quran, Islam must be perfect?!
Do you see the “problem” in your own arguments? Anyways, I think I have indulged you enough..
Pl. only comment on the (main) post above or to my questions…otherwise I reserve the right to ignore/delete/modify your comments…and pl. stick to the topic. Pl. also give references and support your arguments with logic otherwise they are just words without much substance.
*** Updated ***
1st Apr ’08
Over at Sandeep’s blog, Shanth has made a comment that I felt was worth reproducing here (24th Mar ’08):
From J-e-D issues fatwa against Vande Mataram:
Reproducing a tweet from centreofright:
here’s my view: the question is how to get a populace to view it symbolically rather than literally, especially when, as is the case of the Muslims, they already feel oppressed.
@Rafiq: It is not the Muslims who are oppressed but hindus. Even putting up a temporary structure for the Amarnath pilgrims tantamounts of demographic invasion as per Kashmiri muslims. Is it not opression of the worst kind ? After vivisection of the country called prepartition India where are the hindus in Pakistan and Bangladesh ? In India the Muslim population has increased from 9% to over 13%. How can population of a particular community increase if they are opressed. Oppressed are the hindus in Pakistan, Bangladesh, and even in Kashmir. Oppressed are the Hindus in India whose populatoin is declining as a percentage. Oppressed are the Hindus in India whose temples are nationalised by the government and mismanaged, funds diverted for purposes other than religious, even to other religions. Oppressed are hindus whose tax money is used to subsidise haj, madrassas, payment towards madrassa teachers etc., etc., Opressed are hindus when the government terms their beloved God Lord Rama as mythological figure and even certain Chief Minister hurl abuses on HIM. The list is endless. Today it is Vande Mataram. Tomorrow it may even be even our cherished National Anthem. Somebody is going to have some nitpicking and objections to some words.
Even in truncated India they dictate terms.
Muslims had clear choice at time of partition either leave Bharat for Islamic rule or stay back with us. And those who chose to stay back have to abide by the law of Bharat and not to dictate the state for their purpose. No one (Hindu/Muslim/Christian/Buddhhist/..) has that right to dictate the state and change the law for some religious purpose.
It will be better for our country that politicians understand that Hindu community will no more tolerate any misdeed towards them.
Jai Hind!
@Rafiq: Thanks for sharing your thoughts.
Yes, we can attempt to underline the symbolic importance (even more)..and try and persuade people that it is not to be taken “literally”.
The reality though is that the vast majority of people (Hindus and Muslims alike) have not read Bankim Chandra in original (or in translation) and for them the words are already symbolic – representing their fervour and feelings towards the motherland.
The real “issue” I feel is the so-called Muslim leadership – which thrives on real and manufactured grievances and has a vested interest in the community being perceived as oppressed. Unless we tackle them, not much will change, I am afraid.
An example of this leadership’s bias and prejudices is their stance on female literacy and reservation for women.
In line with the Deobandi thinking, which the Taliban claim influenced them, the Jamiat came down heavily on women in several resolutions.
Pl. see this extract from Veiled burqa threat from Jamiat faction:
Individual mullahs from all parts of the country, speaking on the various resolutions, made it clear what they feel a woman’s status in society should be – “secondary and subdued”. The Jamiat also disapproved of 33 per cent reservation for women as “unnecessary and unacceptable” but wanted separate reservation for Muslims.
What we have here in the the 21st century is a religion that suffers from schizophrenia–i.e. a total disconnect from reality where it is unable to perceive what is true and what isn’t. It wants the convenience and technology of the West, yet despises it “culture”. George Friedman, in an interview on CNN pointed out the disconnect that affects most muslims. They have been taught that their religion is the best, it is the final word of God, and that all infidels are somehow inferior. (In Saudia, they regularly teach that Jews and other infidels are pigs.) Yet, when it comes to global prosperity, freedom of speech and overall quality of life, many of the non-Islamic nations seem to be doing quite well. Even prosperous Islamic nations fall short on every developmental indicator. Therein lies the problem, how does one relate to the rest of the world that your religion teaches you to despise.
Thus we find the dualistic nature of Islam. They want to be considered loyal, but cannot sing a song pledging allegiance to the motherland. (That aside, both Islam and Christianity do not have the concept of matrubhoomi–that is why they found it easy to go everywhere and rob natives of their homeland.)
What is truly amazing is that while Indian Muslims in the US have no problem pledging allegiance to the flag (which is in essence bowing down to the flag), they have problems in India singing Vande Mataram. This is only amazing to us by the way, since we believe in consistency of behaviour and values. This is not considered a value according to the Koran where Mohammed clearly states that, if one is weak, one acquiesces and if one is strong, one dominates.
From a 3-yr old news-report:
***
Also note that the “controversial” lines which invoke Durga Mata are not in the first two stanzas…Another report from 3-years ago Now, a fatwa to sing Vande Mataram:
Regarding the mindset of the Ulema and of their adherents, I suggest the reading of “The World of Fatwas” by Arun Shourie. Its primary sources of evidence are clearly annotated. It is eye-popping, to say the least, to those of us who’re unacquainted (all of us?!)with the influence of the ulemas, origin and nature of fatwas and the canonical sanction for the rulings in the fatwas. Here’s a link to those who don’t wish to read the entire book http://www.indolink.com/Book/book33.html
Bite this now:
“Jamiat issues fatwa against singing Vande Mataram”
2. http://blog.taragana.com/n/muslim-clerics-support-vande-mataram-fatwa-bjp-calls-it-anti-national-216069/
3. http://www.inditop.com/politics/unaware-of-resolution-against-vande-matram-chidambaram
And you know what the Honarable Home Minister PC was there in this conference of 2 days.
This spineless HM has shown to the world that anyone literally anyone can come, stay and change the rules and tradition of this nation. It doesn’t matter at all to this politicians whether the nation is screeming out loudly against this islamic atyachar or citizens are being tortured to change their religion. No one gives a damn to this.
What Shri Nathuram Godase did was wrong when considered freedom, but correct when we consider patriotism. Shri Godase should have done his job at least before independance, so that we could have been living here without the fear of dying everyday in our home.
Congressi are the most communal, divisive and anti-national. They are far more dangerous to the nation than extremists of any type.
-Jai Hind.
Shantanu, well said:
“The real “issue†I feel is the so-called Muslim leadership – which thrives on real and manufactured grievances and has a vested interest in the community being perceived as oppressed. Unless we tackle them, not much will change, I am afraid.”
The other critical issue, which I do believe is even more problematic, is that Muslims are taught from a very tender age (indoctrinated, I should say) that the Quran, and only the Quran has all the answers, including how to live in our current modern world.
And, then to add to that, only the ulema (“learned scholars” or previously indoctrinated sheep), as Sanjay pointed out, are considered the final arbiters of all matters on this earth and they reach their decisions/evaluation based on the quran and the hadith of the 6th century.
So, how will a modern world not have conflict with the views emanating from the 6th century? The christians had their renaissance in the 14th century, islam is still waiting for its renaissance.
The only solution that I can see is the following:
Compulsory secular, school education for all muslim children between the age groups of 6-14 years, especially girl children. Madrassas are not to be considered an equivalent in any case.
hindustan hamaari mehboob sarzameen hai , hamaari mabood nahi (india is our beloved country , not our idol to worship ).
@ awara: Pl. read this post: Vande Mataram – Expose the Mullah’s specious argument
The other thing I would like to mention is that hard-line positions can be enormously counter-productive. A stance such as yours is not at all helpful in forging an “Indian Identity”.
How long do we want to think of ourselves as Hindus. Muslims, Christians etc? Why cannot we be “Bharatiya”/Indians first and foremost?
Remarks and attitudes such as yours are the fodder that fuel a hardline stance amongst Hindus.
Extracted from a Twitter exchange between Kanchan Gupta and Barkha Dutt:
Kanchan Gupta: Vande Mataram res gets curiouser. Deoband denied fatwa. So what explains resolution? Ploy to instigate backlash?
These are res adopted by Jamiat. It’s political. Which makes them more sinister. India’s version of Taliban.
Barkha Dutt: pity not enough debate or outrage over other resolutions at deoband including one against women. Orthodoxy of all faiths anti women
Kanchan Gupta: Orthodoxy must be tackled by state. Recall how orthodoxy’s opp to age of consent and widow remarriage was brushed aside.
First set of laws in free India were Hindu reform laws. Why no Muslim reform laws?
2 attempts made, both times state crumbled.about 1st when Bill to enable Muslim adoption introduced. Mullahs went berserk. Set up MPLB (which has no legit) and Mrs G retreated. 2nd was Shah Bano when Rajiv helped mullahs reverse SC ruling and made orthodoxy stronger.
It’s disingenuous to blame orthodoxy of every faith. State has tamed Hindu orthodoxy. Why can’t it defang mullah orthodoxy? Unless this iusse is discussed, it’s a sterile debate. Sorry to say this, but media will never tackle larger issue of state pandering to Muslim orthodoxy. That’s what PC was doing.
Worse, Hindu reform must be state driven, but Muslim reform come from within! Why? Because state not over faith?
If ever a proof was needed that the so-called liberals (exemplified by Burkha Dutt’s views) consider Muslims as non-Indians, the above twitter exchange should be sufficient.
You have to take the latest protestations as the Muslim way of keeping the pot on the boil. In that controversies are raked up even when there are none to keep the Islamic flag flying high and to overshadow any other claims for loyalties. The natural thing to do is to rebut such claims but to do would give legitimacy to their arguments. To ignore such claims and when they are repeated time and time again, they become the established truth. I favour is the Chinese approach which is to suppress such dissent which in a democracy is hard to justify but legitimate.
On the word vande and bande it comes back to our preoccupation as Hindus to respect and worship rather than one of love and to honour. Muslims would have no excuse to flay any democracies with their devious preoccupation to occupy the high the ground in all spheres. We need to be guarded in our use of words. As a Hindu, it does not come to me naturally to speak of worshipping or respecting Bharat, but to love and honour is tangible.
i m not a hardliner and i do not need anyone to preach patriotism to me .i will never sing vande mataram if hindu hardliners force me to do it , i will sing it proudly if muslim fanatics stop me from singing it . i love and adore my mother more than my life , but i do not worship her like a god , thats the basic difference between ur view and my view .
Good news: Muslims defy ‘fatwa’, sing Vande Mataram:
Betul (MP), Nov 9 (PTI) Defying the ‘fatwa’ issued by Jamiat-Ulama-e-Hind against rendition of Vande Mataram, a group of Muslims led by a clergyman joined people from other communities in singing the national song in front of a mosque here.
A large number of people from a cross section of the society collected in front of the Jama Masjid at Betul Bazar at the invitation of its Imam Hafiz Abdul Razique and recited the song yesterday.
The event was organised by “Rukmani Balaji Mandir”, its founder Sam Verma, an NRI, said.
After singing the national song at the temple, a rally acclaiming “Bharat Mata” was taken out and when it was proceeding towards the Bazar Chowk, Razique requested them to sing “Vande Mataram” in front of the Mosque. Several members of the minority community joined in.
@ awara: “…i do not worship her like a god…”
Neither is anyone asking you to…this is a classic red-herring. The two stanzas that comprise the national song do not have any references to any God – so where is the question of worship?
Pl. read my comment #28 too.
Re. “…i will sing it proudly if muslim fanatics stop me from singing it” I am therefore concluding that you do not support the fanatics at Deoband on this issue.
In Gujarat too! Some muslims opposed the fatwa and are ready to sing Vande Matram.
“We issue fatwa only when someone approaches us to seek guidance,†he said, adding that the seminary cannot withdraw the edict which was issued three years ago. The cleric, however, made it clear that his organisation has no objection to non-Muslims singing the song.” As per the Pioneer report.
What he wants to convey by the statement “his organization has no objection to non-muslims singing the song”. In India, a democratic country, where hindus are in majority, this organization can also take objection to non-muslims singing the song if the organizations wishes to take such a stand. In the present case they are magnimous enough not to take such a stand. Are we at the mercy of such clerics and their organizations? The Muslims appeasers should answer.
deoband is a patriotic organization and many ulemas laid down their lives for the freedom struggle fighting alongside hindu patriots . this is a truth that u right wing hardliners cannot digest . baba ramdev and many more from the saffron outfit have said about deobands patriotic role in india’s freedom struggle .it has become a fashion to twist deoband out of context to show it in a poor light . deobands major problems today is the power struggle within its trustees ,especially the uncle nephew rivalry between arsdad madani and mehmood madani . mehmood a rajya sabha MP has become politically ambitious and has broken the age old traditin of keeping the media and politicians out of its gatherings and meetings . mehmood is hobnobbing with politicians and right wing leaders ,and that will prove to be his nemesis . my advise to muslims today is don’t trust chidambaram’s congress , keep a distance from right wing saffronites and show the politically ambitious mehmood madani his place by exposing his misdeeds . we need the deoband of the golden old days where the ulemas held their heads high against the british rule even when they were hung on trees in public along with patriotic hindus.
tell mehmood madani to practice the fatwas first and then impose it . he should resign from his rajya sabha seat as its proceedings begin and end with vande mataram.
An article from 3 years ago (Sept 06, 2006)…Pl. read Arif Mohammed Khan on Vande Mataram ‘Unnecessary And Irrelevant’
Excerpt from JuH endorsement of Vande Mataram fatwa unacceptable: Khurshid:
“I don’t think it’s a controversy. They (JuH) wasted their time passing the resolution. It is unacceptable,” the Minister said when asked to comment on the issue.
..He had earlier described the resolution as counter- productive, saying “It is not good for our society, our country and for Muslims”.
It becomes imperative to analyse the objections raised by the Muslim community against the recital of the Vande Mataram.
The controversy over the singing of Vande Mataram has once again threatened to divide the country on communal lines. The refusal of the Muslims to sing this song seems to have angered the Hindutva ideologues, who, without giving them an opportunity to explain their position, have accused them of being anti-national. Hence, it becomes imperative to analyse the objections raised by the Muslim community against the recital of the Vande Mataram. Islam, being a monotheist religion, forbids the apotheosis of any deity, animate or inanimate, except God, the Supreme Creator. In fact, ascribing divinity or any attribute of divinity to even Prophet Muhammad (Pbuh) is considered an act of blasphemy negating the very purpose of Islam, that is, to promote the concept of unity of mankind through the worship of a common Creator.
In this context, those opposed to the Muslim point of view should know that, Bankimchandra Chatterjee’s Vande Mataram contains verses which are in direct conflict with the beliefs of Islam. For instance, the fourth stanza of the song addresses motherland India as, “Thou art Durga, Lady and Queen, with her hands that strike and her swords of sheen, Thou art Lakshmi lotus-throned……..†When a Muslim sings these words he is forced to equate his country with the Hindu goddesses Durga and Lakshmi, thereby deifying the physical land of India and beseeching it to “arise and save.†This militates against the concept of Tawheed (oneness of God) according to which a Muslim cannot supplicate to anyone except God. Therefore, just as one cannot force non-Muslims to recite the Quran in their gatherings, it would be most unfair to force the Muslims to violate their Scriptural injunctions by questioning their patriotism.
The religious predicament of the Muslims was understood in the right spirit decades ago by Jawaharlal Nehru. In October 1937, when the Congress Working Committee met in Calcutta under the Presidentship of Nehru, it adopted a resolution which said, “The Committee recognizes the validity of the objection raised by Muslim friends to certain parts of the song. While the Committee has taken note of such objection insofar as it has intrinsic value, the Committee wishes to point out that the modern evolution of the use of the song as part of National life is of infinitely greater importance than its setting in a historical novel before the national movement had taken shape. Taking all things into consideration, therefore, the Committee recommend that, wherever Bande Mataram is sung at national gatherings, only the first two stanzas should be sung, with perfect freedom to the organisers to sing any other song of an unobjectionable character, in addition to, or in the place of, the Bande Mataram song.†(Quoted by A.G. Noorani in the Frontline, Jan 2-15, 1999).
Based on the above resolution, the Hindutva brigade wants the Muslims to sing the first two stanzas arguing that there is nothing wrong in bowing to the motherland. This is a deliberate attempt to mislead the minority community, because, many Hindus elevate “Bharat Mata†or Mother India, to the status of a goddess as clearly seen in the traditional depiction of India as a lady dressed in a saree holding a red flag. In fact, in 1936, a Bharat Mata temple was built in Benaras by Shiv Prashad Gupt and was inaugurated by none less than Mahatma Gandhi. Then in May 1983, Swami Satyamitranand Giri founded a Bharat Mata temple in Haridwar which has a statue of Bharat Mata holding a milk urn in one hand and sheaves of grains in the other. According to the temple guide book, “the temple serves to promote the devotional attitude towards Bharat Mata, something that historians and mythological story-teller may have missed.†(Mc Kean, Lise. “Bharat Mata: Mother India and Her Militant Matriotsâ€, in Devi : Goddesses of India, edited by John S.Hawley and Donna M.Wulff, Motilal Banarasidass Publishers, Delhi, 1998).
Moreover, not many know that Bharat Mata poojas are regularly performed all over India. The Hindu, on Jan 3, 2005 reported one such pooja by the BJP activists in a temple in Mahabubnagar, Andhra Pradesh, during which there was a clash between the BJP and CPI (M) workers. The Chandigarh Tribune reported on April 13, 2002 that the employees of the Govt. Medical College and Hospital in Chandigarh performed the pooja of Bharat Mata “as per the Indian culture.†Also, the largest Hindu website dedicated to the freedom movement, http://www.freeindia.org, has posted an ancient Sanskrit Hindu verse glorifying Mother India as a goddess. It reads, “Ratnakaradhautapadam Himalyakirtitinim (I) Brahmara-jarsiratnamdhyam vande Bharatamataram (II)â€. When translated it means, “I pay my obeisance to mother Bharata, whose feet are being washed by the ocean, who wears the mighty Himalaya as her crown, and who is exuberantly adorned with the gems of traditions set by Brahmarsis and Rajarsis.â€
The aforementioned facts prove deification of India by the Hindus, which means that the Muslims, by singing the first two stanzas of the Vande Mataram, would be violating the basic tenet of Islam, that is Tawheed. It cannot be argued that saluting the motherland is harmless because the fourth stanza clearly identifies the land of India mentioned in the first stanza with goddess Durga and Lakshmi, and therefore, any salutation to motherland tantamounts to bowing before Hindu goddesses – an act unthinkable for a Muslim. The Muslims respect the right of the Hindus to worship any deity, but they cannot be forced to commit un-Islamic acts.
Another reason for the Muslims’ reluctance to sing the Vande Mataram is the fact that the novel Anandamath by Bankimchandra Chatterjee, in which it was first published, glorified the ethnic cleansing of the Muslims. As an example the following passage may be quoted. “The rural people ran out to kill the Muslims while coming across them. In the night, some were organised in groups and going to the Muslim locality, they torched their houses and looted their everything. Many Muslims were killed; many of them shaved their beards, smeared their bodies with soil and started singing the name of Hari. When asked, they said, we were Hindus. The frightened Muslims rushed towards the town in group after group. ( pages 161-162 of Abbey of Delight, the English translation of Anandamath , by Arabinda Das).
In any case, the Vande Mataram is a national song and not the national anthem of India, hence refusal to sing it cannot be construed as showing disrespect to the country. Given the fact that the Muslims have been singing the Jana Gana Mana ever since India attained independence, and the fact that they have laid down their lives for the country during and after the freedom struggle, their nationalist spirit cannot be doubted even for a minute. It must be understood that India being a secular democracy, every community has the right to profess and practice its faith so long as it does not challenge the unity and integrity of the nation, and therefore, the coercive imposition of the beliefs of one religion over another would only result in communal disharmony.