I am beginning to dread Mumbai..

I am beginning to dread Mumbai..

My favourite city when I was growing up has today become a place that I try hard to avoid. The reasons are not hard to find. Lack of an efficient system of public transport tops the list. Add to this, the traffic snarls. To this, add a humid climate and uncontrolled, chaotic crowds that jostle for space with shops, scooters, buses & cars.

Don’t get me wrong. There are still many things that keep me hooked on Mumbai. The spirit of enterprise, the numerous eating joints, the real feel of a cosmopolis and the walk along Marine Drive – to name just a few. But all these are increasingly overshadowed by my dread of being stuck in an endless traffic snarl or missing my meeting (worse, a flight) or having nowhere to go for a walk if I feel like unwinding after a long day.

Mumbai’s problems are not unique. At their core is the utter failure of government and administration to deal with rapid urbanisation that is happening across the length and breadth of India.  This urbanisation is the reason for Guwahati losing its charm. This urbanisation is the reason Delhi is fast becoming a cold, ruthless city seething with rage. It is what long-term residents of Pune dread. And it is the reason Bengaluru’s distances are now calculated in “hours” rather than kilometres.

To get a sense of the magnitude of the challenge we face, sample this:

  • Over 32% of Indians living in major cities still live in single room homes. In most Tier-I cities, “Affordable Housing” remains a pipe dream.
  • Almost no Indian city has water coming through the pipes that is safe to drink. Waste disposal remains a common problem across towns and cities in India
  • Sometime between now and the next 10 years, 3 Indian cities will be among the fastest growing cities world-wide. These are Ghaziabad, Surat and Fardiabad. “Twenty-two other Indian cities (will) also find a place in the top 100”. 
  • In Delhi, over 350 kms of nullahs (storm water drains) built hundreds of years ago now carry untreated sewage posing a grave risk to public health & environment
  •  Again, in Delhi while the number of “motor vehicles has increased by 28 times between 1971 and 2011, the road length has increased by only four times”. Experts say in 7 years, “every single inch of road space available in the city would be occupied by a vehicle leading to traffic jams that could last for days.
  • On an average, 10-12 people die every day on the tracks of Mumbai’s suburban rail system. That is almost 4000 people each year. This has been going on for several years

And finally this statistic which I doubt would surprise any of you: almost 50% of the population in most cities live in slum-like conditions.

About 3 years ago, I visited one such area in Mumbai. Situated within minutes from the famous RK Studios in Chembur, this area is called Cheetah Camp. Cheeta Camp is unusual because it is a “planned slum”. But the planning does not extend to sewers or basic provisions.

A recent study discovered that the 117,000 residents of Cheeta Camp have just 38 usable toilets among themselves. That means roughly one toilet per 170 people. To understand what this means, take about 30-40 families in your neighbourhood. Now imagine all of them coming to your home to use our one toilet.   I think you get the picture.

Believe it or not, we actually have a “Ministry of Urban Development” with a cabinet rank minister in charge. The minister in charge is the redoubtable Kamal Nath – a man tagged with the “15% label” by Tarun Das, former Chief Mentor, CII and alleged to  have offered “jet airplanes as enticements” to  get support from MPs for the India-US civilian nuclear deal in 2008.

Sadly the Ministry appears to have achieved little.  The Minister himself has publicly said, “We are not building for the future, unlike Hong Kong and Singapore. We are still catching up with the past” 

And his own Ministry’s survey on the state of affairs in our cities has highlighted glaring failures, including the fact that, “more than half of India’s cities have no piped water or sewerage systems, four in five had water for less than five hours per day and seventy per cent households across the states had no lavatory.”  Not only has the Ministry failed to achieve much, it has been dragged into the murky CommonWealth Games Scandal too.

Unfortunately urbanisation is a dull topic for prime time TV. It does not arouse the kind of passion that can get people out on the streets. For most well-read, educated Indians whose stomachs are full, urbanisation is an inevitable “evil” that is ruining their towns and cities. It is the “evil” that is making water scarce; making groceries expensive, commuting a nightmare and jeopardising the safety of their children.

There is little realisation of the long-term implications of this “problem”. It seems most of us assume the challenges of “urbanisation” will be resolved on their own.

But we ignore urbanisation at our own peril. I believe, more than anything, dealing with the effects & impact of rapid urbanisation will be India’s biggest challenge in coming decades.

There are of course other important reasons to bring this issue centre-stage. I will discuss these in Part II.

A slightly edited version of this post was published on the Times of India blogs.

Read Part II here: Engines of growth or hellholes of misery?

B Shantanu

Political Activist, Blogger, Advisor to start-ups, Seed investor. One time VC and ex-Diplomat. Failed mushroom farmer; ex Radio Jockey. Currently involved in Reclaiming India - One Step at a Time.

You may also like...

7 Responses

  1. B Shantanu says:

    From 68m Indians without basic facilities, FRIDAY, 22 MARCH 2013 by ARCHANA JYOTI:

    …Nearly 68 million Indians continue to live in unhygienic conditions without basic facilities in 17.35 million slum dwellings across the country. Interestingly, though, over 70 per cent own their houses, has mobile phones and televisions even as around 5 per cent boasts of four-wheelers.

    …The first-ever survey of slum households in close to 4,000 statutory towns (having municipalities) across the country says that slum households comprise 17.4 per cent of the 78.8 million households in the country with Visakhapatnam topping the list with 44 per cent of slum households followed by Jabalpur (43 per cent), Greater Mumbai (41 per cent), Meerut (40 per cent) and Raipur with 39 per cent.

    Among States, Andhra Pradesh has the largest number of such households at 35 per cent, followed by Chhattisgarh (31 per cent), Madhya Pradesh (28.3 per cent), Maharashtra (22.7 per cent), West Bengal (21 per cent) and Jammu and Kashmir reporting 18.8 per cent. Delhi reported 11.8 per cent slum households while Haryana has 18 per cent slum households.

  2. Prakash says:

    Mumbai belongs to all the Indians (and also to some non Indians). Just like the average train bogey that belongs to Aam Janata. A very good man has said that.

    https://satyameva-jayate.org/2010/02/02/balasaheb-marathi-manoos/

  3. B Shantanu says:

    Prakash: I think you may have misunderstood. I have nothing against people coming into cities..(Mumbai or otherwise)
    I know for a fact that rural life is far from the idyll existence most city-dwellers imagine. I grew up in a city myself – and I have lived in cities all my life.
    How can anyone reasonably argue against the better opportunities and the promise of a better quality of life that lures most people from villages?
    Pl do read the second part of the post too..Hopefully that will clarify./.
    May not be able to debate/discuss this further due to an intense work/travel schedule..Thanks

  4. prakash says:

    Thanks for the reply. You can, like a typical arm-chair philosopher, proclaim that you have nothing against people coming to Mumbai because that is the most acceptable statement. That way, you remain good and all that.

    The politicians have to represent people. That is why, parties like Shiv Sena take up the issue of Mumbai. For the same reason, politicians from Bihar, UP, and further East vehemently oppose any statements from SS and others. Thus, the politicians end up being bad.

    Moral preachers don’t represent any group, so they can say (only) those things that appeal to people and leave the bad things to others.

    As for your view, since you have not spelt out your vision for Mumbai (Try and do that under the soneki chidiya label), there is nothing to debate. Further, (please check the number of times you have posted a similar excuse to run away and keep your ‘good person’ label intact) you do not have time for debate, so there is no scope to debate.

  5. B Shantanu says:

    Prakash: Here’s a request for you: Why don’t you pl suggest a “Vision” for Mumbai/urban centres which I/we will be delighted to adopt after debate/ discussion?
    I am serious (and sincere) about this.
    None of us have all the wisdom in the world to have a policy on each issue – neither do we have the capability to come up with the best-practices for each matter under the sun (not to mention the very real constraint of time and resources).
    So if you can help with this – or even post links/references here, that would be a great starting point.
    Pl do consider – and I hope you can help.
    Thanks.

  6. prakash says:

    I will try to respond to your last comment in a more general sense.

    I guess the second paragraph of your last comments says it all. Indeed, we cannot do everything or do justice to every subject. Because of these limitations we need to be careful about what we discuss; the very subject that one chooses to discuss becomes a political statement.

    I do not have any policy or ideas about a single city or a single political leader. If I do decide to take up the issue of overcrowding or congested cities, I will try and address the source of immigration first, not the destination of immigrants. People would not have migrated to Mumbai if their localities had seen good development in the years gone by.

    Also consider this. A cabby in London has to study the city map and pass an exam that typically requires 2 years’ preparation. In India though, anyone can drive a taxi or an auto and any attempt to introduce any discipline in this matter is shouted down with ‘Mumbai belongs to everyone’ type of moral shout. You joined the chorus then and you are lamenting the plight of Mumbai now. I just wanted to point that out.

    On a much broader level, I believe Gandhian economics will be studied with more attention in near future (China is already doing that), and there will be a reversal of globalisation to a very significant extent.

  7. Naresh says:

    A message for Prakash?

    Hi Prakash, Are you from Mumbai?

    Regards,

    Naresh