Home » China related, Geo-Strategic Issues (incl. Nuclear, Oil, Energy), India & Its Neighbours, Politics and Governance in India

“Never Again The Same” – Excerpts

19 July 2009 140 views 14 Comments

Courtesy Atanu , I stumbled on this 1962 TIME Magazine story on the Indo-Chinese War of 1962. Excerpts below.

*** “Never Again the Same” ***

…After a series of smashing victories in the border war with India, Chinese troops swept down from the towering Himalayas and were poised at the edge of the fertile plains of Assam, whose jute and tea plantations account for one-fourth of India’s export trade. Then, with Assam lying defenseless before her conquering army, Red China suddenly called a halt to the fighting.

Radio Peking announced that, “on its own initiative.” Red China was ordering a cease-fire on all fronts. Further, by Dec. 1, Chinese troops would retire to positions 12½ miles behind the lines they occupied on Nov. 7. 1959.

.

…In New Delhi the government of Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru was taken completely by surprise. An Indian spokesman first denounced the Chinese offer as a “diabolical maneuver.” which was later amended to the comment that India would “wait and see” exactly what the Chinese were proposing. A communique confirmed that, after the cease-fire deadline, there “had been no report of firing by the Chinese aggressors.” Indian troops also stopped shooting, but Nehru warned India: “We must not imagine that the struggle will soon be over.”

On closer examination, the Chinese cease-fire proved to be a lot less mysterious. It did offer India’s battered armies a badly needed respite. But it left the Chinese armies in position to resume their offensive if Nehru refuses the Peking terms. And it puts on India the onus of continuing the war. Said the Hindustan Times: “The latest Chinese proposals are not a peace offer but an ultimatum.”

…In New Delhi illusions are dying fast….Nehru’s policy of nonalignment, which was intended to free India from any concern with the cold war between the West and Communism, was ending in disaster. Nearly shattered was the morally arrogant pose from which he had endlessly lectured the West on the need for peaceful coexistence with Communism. Above all. the Indian people, fiercely proud of their nationhood, have been deeply humiliated and shaken by the hated Chinese.

…The 73-year-old Nehru gave the impression of being swept along by this tumult, not of leading it. His agony was apparent as he rose in Parliament, three days before the Chinese cease-fire announcement, to report that the Indian army had been decisively defeated at Se Pass and Walong. The news raised a storm among the M.P.s. A Deputy from the threatened Assam state was on his feet, shaking with indignation and demanding, “What is the government going to do? Why can’t you tell us? Are we going to get both men and materials from friendly countries to fight a total war, or is the government contemplating a cease-fire and negotiations with the Chinese?”

…While the Speaker asked repeatedly for order, Nehru sat chin in hand, obviously scornful of this display of Indian excitability, his abstracted gaze fixed on nothing.

Nehru was coming close to admitting that he had at last discovered who were India’s friends…(Nehru) was shocked when, instead of helping India, Moscow denounced India’s border claims and urged Nehru to accept the Red Chinese terms.

…a U.S. mission headed by Assistant Secretary of State for Far Eastern Affairs Averell Harriman and U.S. Army General Paul D. Adams flew to New Delhi to confer with Indian officials on defense requirements. Soon after, Britain’s Commonwealth Secretary Duncan Sandys arrived with a similar British mission. Their most stunning discovery: after five years under Nehru’s hand-picked Defense Minister, Krishna Menon, the Indian army was lamentably short of ammunition even for its antiquated Lee Enfield rifles….

India’s catastrophic unreadiness for war stems directly from the policy of nonalignment which was devised by Nehru and implemented by his close confidant Krishna Menon. Says one Indian editor: “Nonalignment is no ideology. It is an idiosyncrasy.”

…Actually, it owes as much to Nehru’s rather oldfashioned, stereotyped, left-wing attitudes acquired during the ’20s and ’30s (“He still remembers all those New Statesmen leaders.” says one bitter critic) as it does to Gandhian notions of nonviolence. Nehru has never been able to rid himself of the disastrous cliche that holds Communism to be somehow progressive and less of a threat to emergent nations than “imperialism.”

…At the 1955 Bandung conference. Nehru and China’s Premier Chou En-lai embraced Panch Shila, a five-point formula for peaceful coexistence. The same Indian crowds that now shout. “Wipe out Chink stink!” then roared “Hindi Chini bhai bhai” (Indians and Chinese are brothers). India refused to sign the peace treaty with Japan because Red China was not a party to it. At home, Menon harped on the theme that Pakistan was India’s only enemy.

…Even the Chinese conquest of Tibet in 1951 had rung no alarm bells in New Delhi—and therein lie the real beginnings of the present war.

…When the Chinese Republic of Sun Yat-sen was born in 1912, Britain decided to look to its borders. At a three-nation meeting in Simla in 1914, Britain’s representative. Sir Arthur McMahon, determined the eastern portion of the border by drawing a line on a map along the Himalayan peaks from Bhutan to Burma. The Tibetan and Chinese delegates initialed this map, but the newborn Chinese Republic refused to ratify it, and so has every Chinese government since.

The McMahon Line was never surveyed or delimited on the ground, and British troops seldom penetrated the NEFA hill country, where such tribes as the Apatanis. the Tagins and the Hill Miris amused themselves by slave-raiding and headhunting. As recently as 1953, the Daflas wiped out a detachment of the Assam Rifles just for the fun of it.

At the western end of the border, in Ladakh. the British made even less of an effort at marking the frontier, and the border with Tibet has generally been classified as “undefined.” Red China was most interested in Ladakh’s northeastern corner, where lies the Aksai Chin plateau, empty of nearly everything but rocks, sky and silence. For centuries, a caravan route wound through the Aksai Chin (one reason the Chinese say the plateau is theirs is that Aksai Chin means “China’s Desert of White Stone”), leading from Tibet around the hump of the lofty Kunlun range to the Chinese province of Sinkiang. In 1956 and 1957 the Chinese built a paved road over the caravan trail, and so lightly did Indian border police patrol the area that New Delhi did not learn about the road until two years after it was built.

…On Oct. 25, strong Chinese patrols began penetrating the NEFA border, occupying Longju and Towang and threatening Walong. For once, Nehru was badly shaken. He said: “From time immemorial the Himalayas have provided us with a magnificent frontier. We cannot allow that barrier to be penetrated because it is also the principal barrier to India.” But the barrier was being daily penetrated. Ten months ago, Nehru appointed Lieut. General Brij Kaul, 50, to command the NEFA area. Then, without consulting any of his military men, Nehru publicly ordered Kaul to drive out the Chinese invaders of NEFA.

The opposing armies were of unequal size, skill and equipment.

…Before Kaul had a chance to try and “clear out” the Chinese in NEFA, the Chinese struck first on Oct. 20. Some 20,000 burp-gun-toting infantry stormed over Thag La ridge and swept away a 5,000-man Indian brigade strung out along the Kechilang River. The surprise was complete, and dazed survivors of the Chinese attack struggled over the pathless mountains, where hundreds died of exposure. In Ladakh the Chinese scored an even bigger victory, occupying the entire 14,000 square miles that Peking claims is Chinese territory.

While the Indians worked to build up a new defense line at Walong and in the lofty Se Pass, reinforcements were hurried to Assam. The effort to bring up men and supplies from the plains was backbreaking. TIME Correspondent Edward Behr made the trip over a Jeep path that was like a roller coaster 70 miles long and nearly three miles high. He reports: “The Jeep path begins at Tezpur, amid groves of banana and banyan trees, then climbs steeply upward through forests of oak and pine to a 10,000-ft. summit. Here the path plunges dizzily downward to the supply base of Bomdi La on a 5,000-ft. plateau, and then zigzags skyward again to the mist-hung Se Pass at 13,556 ft. Above the hairpin turns of the road rise sheer rock walls; below lie bottomless chasms. Rain and snow come without warning, turning the path to slippery mud. Even under the best conditions, a Jeep takes 18 hours to cover the 70 miles.

“At this height, icy winds sweep down from the snow crests of the Himalayas, and if a man makes the slightest exertion, his lungs feel as if they are bursting. Newcomers suffer from the nausea and lightheadedness of mountain sickness. Every item of supply, except water, must be brought up the roller coaster from the plains. There are few bits of earth flat enough for an airstrip, and helicopters have trouble navigating in the thin air.”

…After three weeks, Kaul felt emboldened to make a probing attack on the Chinese lines. Following an artillery barrage, 1,000 Indian jawans (G.I.s) drove the Chinese from the lower slopes of a hill near Walong. It was a costly victory, for the Chinese launched a massive counterattack through and around Walong, driving the Indians 80 miles down the Luhit valley. At Se Pass, the Chinese victory was even more spectacular…

Panic spread from the mountains into the plains. Officials in Tezpur burned their files, and bank managers even set fire to stacks of banknotes…Indian army headquarters was hastily moved from Tezpur to Gauhati, 100 miles to the southwest. Officers and men who had escaped from the fighting referred dazedly to the Chinese as swarming everywhere “like red ants.”

…Though India—like the U.S. after Pearl Harbor—could not yet afford scapegoats and recrimination, Defense Minister Krishna Menon was almost universally blamed for the inadequacy of Indian arms, the lack of equipment and even winter clothing. His fall from grace not only finished his own career but brought a turning point in Nehru’s. The Prime Minister had tried to pacify critics by taking over the Defense Ministry and downgrading Menon to Minister of Defense Production, but Nehru’s own supporters demanded Menon’s complete dismissal.

On Nov. 7, Nehru attended an all-day meeting of the Executive Committee of the parliamentary Congress Party and made a final plea for Menon, whose intellect, he said, was needed in the crisis.

As a participant recalls it, ten clenched fists banged down on the table, a chorus of voices shouted, “No!”

Nehru was dumfounded. It was he who was used to banging tables and making peremptory refusals. Taking a different tack, he accurately said that he was as much at fault as Menon and vaguely threatened to resign. Always before, such a threat had been sufficient to make the opposition crumble with piteous cries of ‘Panditji, don’t leave us alone!” This time, one of the leaders said: “If you continue to follow Menon’s policies, we are prepared to contemplate that possibility.” Nehru was beaten and Menon thrown out of the Cabinet.

…There is still considerable dispute over how little or how much the Chinese were after in their attack on India.

…The prevailing theory now is that the Chinese had less ambitious aims to begin with: to take the high ground and the key military passes away from the Indians, and to finally establish, once and for all, Chinese control of the Aksai Chin plateau in Ladakh, so as to safeguard the vital military roads to Sinkiang province. The Chinese may have been unprepared to exploit the almost total collapse of India’s armed forces and may even have been surprised by their swift success. On this reading, the terms of the Chinese cease-fire offer become intelligible. The Nov. 7 line would in effect barter away the sizable Chinese gains in NEFA for Indian acceptance of China’s property rights in Aksai Chin.

…by in effect quitting while they are ahead, the Chinese can play the peacemakers in the short-sighted eyes of the neutral nations, while having dramatically demonstrated their military superiority over India and without having to abandon the long-range threat.

…And Nehru must know that the situation has reached a point where he can never again trust a Red Chinese promise and that the relationship between India and China has changed irrevocably. His policy of nonalignment has not been jettisoned. It has just ceased to have any meaning.

…But though India moves at a different pace and speaks with a different voice few could doubt last week the Indian determination to see that the Himalayan defeats were avenged, however long it may take.

*** End of Excerpts ***

Sadly, the “determination to see that the Himalayan defeats were avenged” seems to be something we have forgotten.

How else does one explain the Defence Minister’s bland explanation regarding Chinese incursions? or the meek acceptance of backtracking by Chinese government on border agreements? or the government’s silence over Chinese attempts at cartographic aggression? or the unbelievable-but true attempts at blocking Chinese incursions by forming human chains? or the incredibly naive (and ineffective) attempts at thwarting further claims on our territory? or the huge reluctance to admit that India and China are strategic rivals?

Too many uncomfortable questions…but few in New Delhi are loosing sleep over this…

China? You must be joking…We have a bigger problem on our hands….and more important matters to attend to.

Have a peaceful weekend (if you can).

P.S. If anyone of you read (or heard) the word “China” in any news-reports about Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s visit, pl. leave a comment below with the relevant link. Thanks.

Related Post: “China: Will India repeat the mistakes of 1962?” – Excerpts

14 Comments »

  • 1. Sanjay Anandaram said:

    Shantanu,

    This was great reading given that the details of the China War of 1962 are still classified in India. Obviously, we’ve not learned anything. The July 20th issue of India Today has a shameful article titled India Unprepared by Sandeep Unnithan details the pathetic state of affairs months after 26/11.

    Also,In a landmark paper titled, Developing India’s Foreign Policy “Software,” Daniel Markey, Senior Fellow for South Asia at the Council on Foreign Relations, “outlines significant shortcomings in India’s foreign policy institutions that undermine the country’s capacity for ambitious and effective international action, and proposes steps that both New Delhi and Washington should take, assuming they aim to promote India’s rise as a great power.”

    The paper goes on to say:

    India’s own foreign policy establishment hinders the country from achieving great-power status for four main reasons:

    (1) The Indian Foreign Service is small, hobbled by its selection process and inadequate midcareer training, and tends not to make use of outside expertise;

    (2) India’s think-tanks lack sufficient access to the information or resources required to conduct high-quality, policy-relevant scholarship;

    (3) India’s public universities are poorly funded, highly regulated, and fail to provide world-class education in the social sciences and other fields related to foreign policy; and

    (4) India’s media and private firms—leaders in debating the country’s foreign policy agenda—are not built to undertake sustained foreign policy research or training.

    For India to achieve great-power status, a number of improvements to its foreign policy software will be required:

    • expand, reform, pay, and train the Indian Foreign Service to attract and retain high-caliber officers

    • encourage the growth of world-class social science research and teaching schools in India through partnerships with private Indian and U.S. investors, universities, and foundations

    • invest in Indian think-tanks and U.S.-India exchange programs that build capacity for foreign policy research

    • bring non-career officers into the Indian Ministry of External Affairs and other parts of the foreign policy establishment as term-limited fellows to improve outside understanding of the policy process

    • support the efforts of Indian researchers to maximize public access to material related to the history of India’s foreign policy by way of the 2005 Right to Information Act.

  • 2. Patriot said:

    Thanks, Shantanu, for this post – I had to stop reading multiple times, shaken by anguish and anger.

    The Indian Express had this editorial recently on this same issue:
    http://www.indianexpress.com/news/keeping-secrets/491016/

    We, the people of India, need to demand greater transparency from our government, the leviathan that we have to control.

  • 3. Patriot said:

    The other thing that people of India should remember is the role of the Indian communist parties – the blood traitors.

    The Communist Party of India supported the position of China in this war.

    The Communist Part of India (Marxist) censured and punished Achutanandan for daring to suggest that the CPM workers (who had been jailed in Kerala, including Achutanandan) should organise a blood drive to support the Indian Army.

  • 4. B Shantanu (author) said:

    @ Sanjay: Thanks…and also for raising some very interesting points. I will attempt a response.

    (1) The Indian Foreign Service is small, hobbled by its selection process and inadequate mid-career training, and tends not to make use of outside expertise – Largely true (it is not just small, it is hopelessly inadequate in numbers and ill-equipped). Also on issues of critical/national importance (such as China, Pakistan), the political class influences policy as much as (if not more) than South Block. Needless to say, this does not always serve our national interest.

    Agree with points about Think-Tanks and Universities. We are now paying the price for lack of funding and systematic and sustained undermining of independent academic research and scholarship.

    Bringing outside experts into South Block will help hugely. But I would be very surprised if this happens anytime soon (within the next 10 years).

    ***

    @ Patriot: Thanks for the link to the IE Op-Ed…and for highlighting the treachery of the communists…I should try and find a link to the episode you mentioned (if you have it, can you please post it here?).

  • 5. Dirt Digger said:

    @Patriot,
    Great points. In any other country these traitors would have been banned and their supporters sent to prison for treason.
    Only in India these traitors have been given 2 states to rule!
    People’s memories are indeed short.
    Though the people (RSS) who helped organize fund raising to support the Army are forgotten.

  • 6. RR said:

    Pl. click here for Capt. Bharat Verma’s recent column re. a possible Chinese attack on India before 2012 and the Chinese response to it

  • 7. Rohit said:

    Not right to shift the blame from Nehru to Communist parties.

    The then army leader Kaul (without any combat experience) was handpicked and promoted by Nehru. Nehru had ignored genuine needs (Clothing, Shoes, Food, Equipments + Supply of Ammunition)of defence to fight in war in cold and mountaneous terrains. This war has history of records. Chinese were extremely apprehensive about Indian army which had a glorious experience of fighting wars (successfully) in most difficult terrrains around the world in WW1 & WW2 but the same Indian army was defeated heavily. Beauraucracy and Nehru led the war from back stage and sacrificied soldiers and when defeat was evident walked away uttering helplessness to offer advice to military. No Chinese Soilder could be captured by Indian soldiers. Indian soilders died by both weather and chinese ammo but no record of death due to weather conditons has been published. The war cries were more uttered by Indian media and Nehru than Chinese. The fact is that governent has not yet published the official investigation report even though US has released CIA papers and China has released their calssified papers.

    US papers to summarize are filled with odour of US views on China and comunism and blame communists while also blaming Nehru. Neville Maxwell also wrote a book on same which is acepted by defense analysts as well balanced account of events that led to Indo China war. If you read the former (CIA) version, comunists are evil + Nehru foolishness is to be blamed… If you read latter version (Neville Maxwell) Nehru is to be blamed. The latter provides more indepth and reasoned analysis while CIA version is heavily laed with America’s perception of communism.

    The after math of the war is even more interesting and ironical especially for sickular congressis and rest of Indians

  • 8. Patriot said:

    This article refers to the CPM punishing Achuthanandan for organising the blood drive – but, I remember reading a much bigger article on this somewhere – will try to get hold of it.

    cheers

  • 9. Patriot said:

    Ah, here is the original recap: During China war, comrades cracked down on VS for saying let’s give blood to jawans

  • 10. Dirt Digger said:

    @Patriot,
    Apparently the Indian express writer has more sympathy for CPM than VS.

    ” In 1962, he organised a blood donation campaign for Indian soldiers during the Indo-China war, a move that put him at odds with his party. What then appeared as a callow, youthful streak of defiance continued to surface through Achuthanandan’s political life and is now interpreted as a codgerish, doctrinaire refusal to modulate his responses to his party’s context.

    Donating blood for soldiers is deemed “callow” and “youthful streak of defiance”. Wow only in India.
    I hope the editor read this and fired the reporter.

  • 11. Patriot said:

    @ DD -

    Right on. I hope so, too.

    Although, the Indian Express, in general, in editorial comment, takes a very strong anti-communist line.

  • 12. B Shantanu said:

    A short excerpt from Learn from past, focus on China by Swapan Dasgupta:

    …That Xinjiang or East Turkestan (as it is called by Uighur nationalists) has long and profound links with India has been conveniently forgotten. Yet, as late as 1951, India had its own consulate in Kashgar, the trading hub of Xinjiang, an arrangement that dated back to 1890. The occupant of Chini-Bagh (renamed India House in 1947 but now known by its original name) in Kashgar was drawn from the Indian Political Service and received instructions, not from Whitehall but from the Viceroy’s council. Indeed, before he was accorded full diplomatic recognition by the Chinese government in 1904, Sir George Macartney’s official position was special assistant for Chinese affairs to the resident in Kashmir — a pointer to the fact Xinjiang had everything to do with India.

    …It was the wooliness of Nehru and the gullibility of K N Panikkar, India’s first ambassador to China, which allowed Zhou Enlai to sweet-talk India into closing its consulates in both Kashgar and Lhasa in Tibet. Zhou gave a verbal assurance that Indian interests will be looked after by a friendly China. The closure was the precursor to the stealthy construction of the Karakoram highway linking Xinjiang and Tibet and the formal occupation of Aksai Chin in 1962. India suffered humiliation because it was too trusting and had abandoned its geo-political responsibilities.

  • 13. B Shantanu said:

    Daniel Markey’s paper (referred to in Sanjay’c comment @ #1) can be downloaded here: “Developing India’s Foreign Policy Software”

  • 14. Kiran said:

    Nehru was the worst choice during early 60s & late 50s to be the PM of India. He was an ideologist, not strategist when it comes to country’s interest.

    Clearly he was backstabbed by China with some help from Krishna Menon.

    India is still paying the price for putting a guy who put ideals above selfish interests of the country. Him focusing on Korea & not Tibet was one problem. Him blindly believing in Panch Sheela & Hindi/Chini Bhai Bhai was worse.

    I have heard from my Assamese friend how ‘Good bye Assam’ Nehru speech unnerved them. How could any PM of any country give such a speech?

    In short, we need to make a movie on his Himalayan Blunders. Name it ‘Jokerlal in Blunderland’ :(

Share your thoughts below.

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Share your opinions responsibly. Stay on topic. Please note that by posting a comment, you indicate consent to the terms and conditions of this site. First-timers, please read the comments policy here

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.