Comments on: On meetings, secret reports and good neighbours

By: B Shantanu

B Shantanu — Thu, 23 Jul 2009 08:09:49 +0000

Re. Tavleen Singh's question above: Why is it so hard for us to say this?", apparently it is not so hard:

We won't re-start dialogue with Pakistan unless there is progress in Pakistan's actions,'' said Menon

or is it? I am now thoroughly confused

By: B Shantanu

B Shantanu — Wed, 22 Jul 2009 22:10:20 +0000

From Tavleen Singh's "What’s the point in talking to Pakistan?"

India will not talk to Pakistan as long as its government continues to nurture and shield those who attack India. Why is it so hard for us to say this? Why is it so hard for us to tell the visiting American Secretary of State that it is not possible to speak to people who talk about fighting against Islamist terrorism but openly support an Islamist reptile like Hafiz Mohammed Sayeed.

By: AG

AG — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 11:25:53 +0000

typo:
they’ve lost every war they’ve been asked to FIGHT

By: AG

AG — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 11:25:20 +0000

> we are questioning the people in charge as opposed to the earlier days when our leaders could lose a war and get away free

Does not seem to be working.
After all, MMS and co got an even bigger mandate.
And they’ve lost every war they’ve been asked to find: economic, political or otherwise.

Sorry for being a cynic, but after looking for bright spots, i simply cannot find any.

By: संदीप नारायण शेळ्के

संदीप नारायण शेळ्के — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 07:22:31 +0000

[correction in above reply]

“Lets rise out of the dormancy we have been living for long now. Lets decide that our next generations will be proud of us for our work and will *not* curse like we do.”

forgot the *not* word.

Jai Hind!!