<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How the humble &#8220;Tulsi&#8221; might just save the Taj</title>
	<atom:link href="http://satyameva-jayate.org/2009/06/25/tulsi-taj/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://satyameva-jayate.org/2009/06/25/tulsi-taj/</link>
	<description>Dedicated to "Bharat" and "Dharma"</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 05:42:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kanchan</title>
		<link>http://satyameva-jayate.org/2009/06/25/tulsi-taj/comment-page-1/#comment-35523</link>
		<dc:creator>Kanchan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 13:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://satyameva-jayate.org/?p=1626#comment-35523</guid>
		<description>I agree with bharathaSarathy!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with bharathaSarathy!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VoP</title>
		<link>http://satyameva-jayate.org/2009/06/25/tulsi-taj/comment-page-1/#comment-35365</link>
		<dc:creator>VoP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 15:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://satyameva-jayate.org/?p=1626#comment-35365</guid>
		<description>bharathasarathy ji,
On the other hand, I see this as symbolic reclamation of Tejomahalaya. Hopefully one day, when those closed doors are opened the Truth will be revealed. Tulsi or Vilva I have a strange feeling that SICKulars may be getting disturbed, someone from mullah clan will make noise and then this will take a different spin!  Just extrapolating trends here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bharathasarathy ji,<br />
On the other hand, I see this as symbolic reclamation of Tejomahalaya. Hopefully one day, when those closed doors are opened the Truth will be revealed. Tulsi or Vilva I have a strange feeling that SICKulars may be getting disturbed, someone from mullah clan will make noise and then this will take a different spin!  Just extrapolating trends here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bharathaSarathy</title>
		<link>http://satyameva-jayate.org/2009/06/25/tulsi-taj/comment-page-1/#comment-35361</link>
		<dc:creator>bharathaSarathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 14:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://satyameva-jayate.org/?p=1626#comment-35361</guid>
		<description>Sorry Shantanuji, I don&#039;t see this even as poetic justice as Tulsi to &#039;insulate&#039; Taj Mahal, instead I see as &#039;insult&#039; to Tulsi.  The holy Tulsi is grown reverentially, only at the frontyard (not even at the backyard) as a mark of devotion and respect.  Instead of Tulsi, they should grow Vilva tree at least as an offering to Shiva of this Tejomahalaya! What is so &#039;humble&#039; about it, using Tulsi to save Taj is nothing but another act of &#039;societal stockholm syndrome&#039;!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Shantanuji, I don&#8217;t see this even as poetic justice as Tulsi to &#8216;insulate&#8217; Taj Mahal, instead I see as &#8216;insult&#8217; to Tulsi.  The holy Tulsi is grown reverentially, only at the frontyard (not even at the backyard) as a mark of devotion and respect.  Instead of Tulsi, they should grow Vilva tree at least as an offering to Shiva of this Tejomahalaya! What is so &#8216;humble&#8217; about it, using Tulsi to save Taj is nothing but another act of &#8216;societal stockholm syndrome&#8217;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 5/9 queries in 0.005 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 247/247 objects using disk: basic

Served from: satyameva-jayate.org @ 2012-05-24 15:25:25 -->
