<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dating MahABhArat&#8230;Excerpts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://satyameva-jayate.org/2008/10/06/dating-mahabharat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://satyameva-jayate.org/2008/10/06/dating-mahabharat/</link>
	<description>Dedicated to "Bharat" and "Dharma"</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 19:57:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: B Shantanu</title>
		<link>http://satyameva-jayate.org/2008/10/06/dating-mahabharat/comment-page-1/#comment-274964</link>
		<dc:creator>B Shantanu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 08:58:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://satyameva-jayate.org/?p=567#comment-274964</guid>
		<description>Varsha: The accounts we have of these battles are not &quot;historical&quot; accounts in the strictest sense. Also don&#039;t forget the antiquity of these events..
As for a civilisation suddenly becoming extinct, that is now being challenged by new research...For starters, pl read excerpts from Dr Swamy&#039;s speech here: 
http://satyameva-jayate.org/2009/07/14/defalsify-indian-history/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Varsha: The accounts we have of these battles are not &#8220;historical&#8221; accounts in the strictest sense. Also don&#8217;t forget the antiquity of these events..<br />
As for a civilisation suddenly becoming extinct, that is now being challenged by new research&#8230;For starters, pl read excerpts from Dr Swamy&#8217;s speech here:<br />
<a href="http://satyameva-jayate.org/2009/07/14/defalsify-indian-history/" rel="nofollow">http://satyameva-jayate.org/2009/07/14/defalsify-indian-history/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Varsha</title>
		<link>http://satyameva-jayate.org/2008/10/06/dating-mahabharat/comment-page-1/#comment-273647</link>
		<dc:creator>Varsha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 03:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://satyameva-jayate.org/?p=567#comment-273647</guid>
		<description>Most imp fact i want to know if really during Mahabharata time warriors had brahmastra or magical weapons to kill people. It seems fictious to me when I read about it. But since we have grown up to stories like this and others which forces us to believe in magical weapons. Also, its mysterious how that civilization suddenly extincted and there was a new kingdom - Maurya kingdom at around 1500B.C. I am trying to find these answers please reply bck if there are any websites about these facts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most imp fact i want to know if really during Mahabharata time warriors had brahmastra or magical weapons to kill people. It seems fictious to me when I read about it. But since we have grown up to stories like this and others which forces us to believe in magical weapons. Also, its mysterious how that civilization suddenly extincted and there was a new kingdom &#8211; Maurya kingdom at around 1500B.C. I am trying to find these answers please reply bck if there are any websites about these facts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: P C Mahajan</title>
		<link>http://satyameva-jayate.org/2008/10/06/dating-mahabharat/comment-page-1/#comment-224375</link>
		<dc:creator>P C Mahajan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2011 18:13:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://satyameva-jayate.org/?p=567#comment-224375</guid>
		<description>These data do not match with what Dr P. Vartak have researcged and published. Dr. Vartak,s calculations seem to be more realiestic. Think once again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These data do not match with what Dr P. Vartak have researcged and published. Dr. Vartak,s calculations seem to be more realiestic. Think once again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B Shantanu</title>
		<link>http://satyameva-jayate.org/2008/10/06/dating-mahabharat/comment-page-1/#comment-59428</link>
		<dc:creator>B Shantanu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 10:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://satyameva-jayate.org/?p=567#comment-59428</guid>
		<description>Adding this link here for the record and for further study (Thanks to Rajiv Chandra):

The Great Bharata War: http://www.indicstudies.us/Astronomy/GreatBharatawar.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adding this link here for the record and for further study (Thanks to Rajiv Chandra):</p>
<p>The Great Bharata War: <a href="http://www.indicstudies.us/Astronomy/GreatBharatawar.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.indicstudies.us/Astronomy/GreatBharatawar.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B Shantanu</title>
		<link>http://satyameva-jayate.org/2008/10/06/dating-mahabharat/comment-page-1/#comment-57331</link>
		<dc:creator>B Shantanu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 14:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://satyameva-jayate.org/?p=567#comment-57331</guid>
		<description>Excerpt from &lt;a href=&quot;http://beta.thehindu.com/news/cities/Delhi/article81226.ece&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Delhi&#039;s Mahabharata connection&lt;/a&gt;

...Not many know about the history behind the Kunti Devi temple in Purana Quila, said to be built by the mother of the Pandavas

...A group of people, including students and their parents, who were taken for a walk in the fort last week by heritage activist Surekha Narain, stumbled upon the Kunti Devi Mandir by chance and were fascinated by it. Excavations in the Purana Quila have unearthed black polished ware and painted gray ware, the former dating back to 300 B.C., which strengthens the belief that the site now occupied by the fort was probably part of the Indraprastha built by Yudhistar, with its ‘fairy gates&#039;. Coins dating back to the Gupta and pre-Gupta periods have also been unearthed.

The Imperial Guptas reigned from 319 to 495 A.D. and the fact that they had control over this area long before the Delhi Sultanate came into existence is proof that their kingdom included Delhi and the areas north of it – Punjab, Kashmir and perhaps parts of Afghanistan too. As a matter of fact, it is believed that Maharani Kunti&#039;s sister-in-law Gandhari, wife of the head of the Kauravas, Dhritrashtra, got her name from her native place Ghanadar, as Kandahar was once known. So Kunti Devi&#039;s temple is of some significance.

As intriguing as this temple is the Talaqi Darwaza or Forbidden Gate, which has a mural of a man fighting a lion. Why this gate was considered forbidden is not known but there were probably some secrets lying locked beyond it as it happened to be the northern gate of the fort and perhaps full of telltale ruins of the Mahabharata days and women in bondage, of which orthodox Sultans did not want their subjects to know about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excerpt from <a href="http://beta.thehindu.com/news/cities/Delhi/article81226.ece" rel="nofollow">Delhi&#8217;s Mahabharata connection</a></p>
<p>&#8230;Not many know about the history behind the Kunti Devi temple in Purana Quila, said to be built by the mother of the Pandavas</p>
<p>&#8230;A group of people, including students and their parents, who were taken for a walk in the fort last week by heritage activist Surekha Narain, stumbled upon the Kunti Devi Mandir by chance and were fascinated by it. Excavations in the Purana Quila have unearthed black polished ware and painted gray ware, the former dating back to 300 B.C., which strengthens the belief that the site now occupied by the fort was probably part of the Indraprastha built by Yudhistar, with its ‘fairy gates&#8217;. Coins dating back to the Gupta and pre-Gupta periods have also been unearthed.</p>
<p>The Imperial Guptas reigned from 319 to 495 A.D. and the fact that they had control over this area long before the Delhi Sultanate came into existence is proof that their kingdom included Delhi and the areas north of it – Punjab, Kashmir and perhaps parts of Afghanistan too. As a matter of fact, it is believed that Maharani Kunti&#8217;s sister-in-law Gandhari, wife of the head of the Kauravas, Dhritrashtra, got her name from her native place Ghanadar, as Kandahar was once known. So Kunti Devi&#8217;s temple is of some significance.</p>
<p>As intriguing as this temple is the Talaqi Darwaza or Forbidden Gate, which has a mural of a man fighting a lion. Why this gate was considered forbidden is not known but there were probably some secrets lying locked beyond it as it happened to be the northern gate of the fort and perhaps full of telltale ruins of the Mahabharata days and women in bondage, of which orthodox Sultans did not want their subjects to know about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 4/12 queries in 0.019 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 305/309 objects using disk: basic

Served from: satyameva-jayate.org @ 2012-02-09 09:45:11 -->
