Comments on: “Who is this Ram?” – Will Thiru Karunanidhi look at this evidence? http://satyameva-jayate.org/2008/06/14/ramayana-ramar-setu-history/ Dedicated to "Bharat" and "Dharma" Wed, 23 May 2012 07:41:46 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3 By: rohit http://satyameva-jayate.org/2008/06/14/ramayana-ramar-setu-history/comment-page-1/#comment-397642 rohit Mon, 16 Apr 2012 18:57:51 +0000 http://hindudharma.wordpress.com/?p=569#comment-397642 brilliant analysis brilliant analysis

]]> By: B Shantanu http://satyameva-jayate.org/2008/06/14/ramayana-ramar-setu-history/comment-page-1/#comment-103838 B Shantanu Thu, 09 Sep 2010 16:16:14 +0000 http://hindudharma.wordpress.com/?p=569#comment-103838 @Jatinder: Thanks for your comment. The article us by Dr Nishit Sawal - so all the credit is due to him. Re. the Ram JanmaBhoomi issue, you may find these articles of interest: <a href="http://satyameva-jayate.org/2009/12/06/ram-janmabhoomi-3/" rel="nofollow"> Revisiting Ram Janmabhoomi - Part III</a>. Part II <a href="http://satyameva-jayate.org/2009/07/21/ram-janmabhoomi-2/" rel="nofollow">is here</a> and Part I can be <a href="http://satyameva-jayate.org/2009/04/15/revisiting-janmabhoomi-1/" rel="nofollow"> read here</a> @Jatinder: Thanks for your comment. The article us by Dr Nishit Sawal – so all the credit is due to him.

Re. the Ram JanmaBhoomi issue, you may find these articles of interest:

Revisiting Ram Janmabhoomi – Part III.

Part II is here and Part I can be read here

]]> By: jatinder mahajan http://satyameva-jayate.org/2008/06/14/ramayana-ramar-setu-history/comment-page-1/#comment-103511 jatinder mahajan Wed, 08 Sep 2010 18:15:37 +0000 http://hindudharma.wordpress.com/?p=569#comment-103511 dear sir, i was amazed to read this article- i have an interest in ancient hindu history but have never come across any piece which scientifically argues for authenticity of the ramayana prior to this article. morover, with the decision on ram janambhoomi round the corner, we can use this article [ more archaeological backing of the ramayana will be welcome] to plead our case further if the Allahabad high court bench grants the ownership rights to the muslims. dear sir,
i was amazed to read this article- i have an interest in ancient hindu history but have never come across any piece which scientifically argues for authenticity of the ramayana prior to this article. morover, with the decision on ram janambhoomi round the corner, we can use this article [ more archaeological backing of the ramayana will be welcome] to plead our case further if the Allahabad high court bench grants the ownership rights to the muslims.

]]> By: rajit bali http://satyameva-jayate.org/2008/06/14/ramayana-ramar-setu-history/comment-page-1/#comment-55187 rajit bali Sun, 03 Jan 2010 18:29:11 +0000 http://hindudharma.wordpress.com/?p=569#comment-55187 good article. i'm found the idea of Ram setu originaly being a woden structure quite logical. is the ASI in knowledge of this piece. good article.
i’m found the idea of Ram setu originaly being a woden structure quite logical. is the ASI in knowledge of this piece.

]]> By: संदीप नारायण शेळके http://satyameva-jayate.org/2008/06/14/ramayana-ramar-setu-history/comment-page-1/#comment-50238 संदीप नारायण शेळके Mon, 16 Nov 2009 20:18:25 +0000 http://hindudharma.wordpress.com/?p=569#comment-50238 Why not to scrutinize the history of all of the temple, masjids (built on the demolished Hindu temples, there are numerous examples) and churches in Bharat? These so called secularist want to wipe out the Hindus by destroying their faith and religion. It is clearly being followed since the islamic invasion. Earlier it was Islamic invaders, then British and now congress. If the 'Sethu' is discovered now a days that something like a Sethu is existing in between Bharat and Srilanka. Then how come the historical texts mention the existence of such Sethu, because in those days surely there wasn't a way through which they could have found its existence. No one is claiming the Sethu after its discovery today, buts its been there in our sacred texts when the rest of the world did not even knew how to cook and lead civilised life. It just takes logically thinking to get the answer. <b>Jai Hind!</b> Why not to scrutinize the history of all of the temple, masjids (built on the demolished Hindu temples, there are numerous examples) and churches in Bharat? These so called secularist want to wipe out the Hindus by destroying their faith and religion. It is clearly being followed since the islamic invasion. Earlier it was Islamic invaders, then British and now congress.

If the ‘Sethu’ is discovered now a days that something like a Sethu is existing in between Bharat and Srilanka. Then how come the historical texts mention the existence of such Sethu, because in those days surely there wasn’t a way through which they could have found its existence. No one is claiming the Sethu after its discovery today, buts its been there in our sacred texts when the rest of the world did not even knew how to cook and lead civilised life.
It just takes logically thinking to get the answer.

Jai Hind!

]]>