Comments on: On “AIT”, Islamic Invasions and “Whitewashing History”

By: Malavika

Malavika — Thu, 09 Jun 2011 04:49:31 +0000

@ ACH

Good find.

It is not enough to call her a nut case. She is a politician and stood in elections. If these are her views, it is necessary to inquire where this attitude is coming from. According to the same post she spoke to Mullahs of Saudi Arabia and they confirmed that the practise of having sex slaves is NOT Haram(forbidden).

Franky there is no point blaming the individual and letting the ideology off hook. She is theologically right in that she has the approval of Koran, Hadiths and the Sira(biography of Prophet). Their prophet himself had concubines and reduced female POWs to slavery and sex slavery.

I volunteer this heartless bimbo to be a sex slave.

By: ACH

ACH — Wed, 08 Jun 2011 07:09:05 +0000

From Daily Mail:
Mutairi (Salwa al Mutairi, political activist and TV host from Kuwait) said that during a recent visit to Mecca, she asked Saudi muftis – Muslim religious scholars – what the Islamic ruling was on owning sex slaves. They are said to have told her that it is not haram.
The ruling was confirmed by ‘specialized people of the faith’ in Kuwait, she claimed.
‘They said, that’s right, the only solution for a decent man who has the means, who is overpowered by desire and who does not want to commit fornication, is to acquire jawari.’ Jawari is the plural of the Arabic term jariya, meaning ‘concubine’ or ‘sex slave’.
One Saudi mufti supposedly told Mutairi: ‘The context must be that of a Muslim nation conquering a non-Muslim nation, so these jawari have to be prisoners of war.’

By: Madhusudan

Madhusudan — Tue, 29 Jun 2010 06:57:38 +0000

About studying the history of atrocities wreaked by Mughals on Indians, I feel unless this is understood, how are we to save ourselves from similar such repetition. Sriman Koenraad Elst has written an excellent book titled “Negationism in India”

One quote I heard sometime back. “Those who forget history are condemned to repeat it”

By: Incognito

Incognito — Sun, 05 Jul 2009 05:06:49 +0000

24-

Talageri’s “The Rigveda: A Historical Analysis’ (2000)” can be read online at http://voi.org/books/rig/

By: B Shantanu

B Shantanu — Sun, 04 Jan 2009 16:02:54 +0000

Just stumbled on this: Demolished once for all: Aryan Invasion Theory

“An unknown Indian has taken on proponents of the Aryan invasion/migration theory, demolished their case, and established that northern India is the original home of the Aryans and the Indo-European family of languages. The importance of this remarkable achievement cannot be exaggerated. In course of time, it can compel the revision of the history not only of Indian but also world civilization.” That was Girilal Jain in his masterful review of Shrikant G. Talageri's ‘Aryan Invasion Theory and Indian Nationalism,’ published in 1993. Since then, Talageri, a not-so-unknown Indian now, has come up with two more works. His ‘The Rigveda: A Historical Analysis’ (2000) established that Vedic Aryans were inhabitants of the area to the east of Punjab, traditionally known as Aryavarta; that the region of Saptasindhu formed the western periphery of their activities and that the Aryans migrated from the east to the west within India and beyond it. For this, he relied solely on a detailed analysis of the Rigveda. His latest book, “The Rigveda and the Avesta: the Final Evidence,” seeks to prove conclusively beyond all reasonable doubt that India was the original homeland of the Indo-European family of languages, that the Rigvedic people were settled in areas around and to the east of the Sarasvati river in at least the third millennium BCE if not earlier, that the proto-Iranians who later became Zoroastrians were settled in the areas to the west of the Vedic Aryans, and that both started expanding westward around that period.

Read the full article here