Comments on: Will Arundhati Roy pl. stand up for Francois Gautier? http://satyameva-jayate.org/2008/03/08/will-arundhati-roy-defend-gautier/ Dedicated to "Bharat" and "Dharma" Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:24:59 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3 By: संदीप नारायण शेळके http://satyameva-jayate.org/2008/03/08/will-arundhati-roy-defend-gautier/comment-page-1/#comment-217636 संदीप नारायण शेळके Sun, 28 Aug 2011 19:15:20 +0000 http://satyameva-jayate.org/?p=539#comment-217636 @Sid Arundhati is making a statement that "Maoists are retaliating against government through armed struggle" and there she goes so far to call Bharat a "Corporate, Hindu, Satellite state". When in reality Hindus are the last ones for any benefit. According to her own logic "The recent (non-violent) movement by Team Anna must also be retaliation against govt's corrupt practices" but here she object to the whole movement by calling it fascist. Also by her logic Hindus too should take up arms to protect their interest seeing the communal violence bill. She has lost it all. And everyone knows she is a <a href="www.eng.fju.edu.tw/worldlit/lecture/Roy.ppt" rel="nofollow">born christian</a> and married to, a christian, Gerard Da Cunha to break up in 4 years. Now any person with such rich heritage of Christianity will definitely try and undermine all efforts of development so that conversion can continue unabated. She is with all but Hindus. And Shri Francois Gautier is known for his credentials. So its not expected from her, a christian, to ever support a Hindu or Hindu sympathizer. Jai Bharat! @Sid
Arundhati is making a statement that “Maoists are retaliating against government through armed struggle” and there she goes so far to call Bharat a “Corporate, Hindu, Satellite state”. When in reality Hindus are the last ones for any benefit.

According to her own logic “The recent (non-violent) movement by Team Anna must also be retaliation against govt’s corrupt practices” but here she object to the whole movement by calling it fascist.

Also by her logic Hindus too should take up arms to protect their interest seeing the communal violence bill. She has lost it all. And everyone knows she is a born christian and married to, a christian, Gerard Da Cunha to break up in 4 years. Now any person with such rich heritage of Christianity will definitely try and undermine all efforts of development so that conversion can continue unabated.

She is with all but Hindus. And Shri Francois Gautier is known for his credentials. So its not expected from her, a christian, to ever support a Hindu or Hindu sympathizer.

Jai Bharat!

]]> By: Neeraj Singh http://satyameva-jayate.org/2008/03/08/will-arundhati-roy-defend-gautier/comment-page-1/#comment-217609 Neeraj Singh Sun, 28 Aug 2011 17:06:06 +0000 http://satyameva-jayate.org/?p=539#comment-217609 None could have conquered India had the so called Hindu's been united. I am surprised that we are concerned reading history when it comes to how Aurangzeb looted & destroyed India but don't bring to forefront how some Hindu's transpired to sell this country to Britishers. Aurangzeb was prior to 1757, right? Someone rightly said, we accept history as it suits us. I am a Hindu myself but I fail to understand the discussion above. Duryodhan was never Duryodhan. Duryodhan was indeed named Suyodhan by his parents but its the bloody hostory that names him Duryodhan based on his deeds. WHY? Was bloody Yudhister not a hypocrite who sold his wife but we still call him "Dharamraj". Why do you blame Suyodhan for all that happened to Panchali. On top, do you ever question why did the five brothers marry the same girl but we are quick to ask why Muslims marry twice or thrice. Lord Krishna had so many wives, Do ou dare to ask this question to him or in the society at large? Aurangzeb ruled for his guts & because most of our Maharajas were inefficient, Un-united & were more interested in "Vilasita" instead of fighting the rule of Aurangzeb. He came, conquered & did what he wanted to do. This is what anyone would do. Why don't you also at the same time discuss those muslim rulers who did good to Hindu's? When you write a comment, don't just write on an abstract. Use the Context & then write the comments. We think ourselves to be the torch bearers of the next world. With such partisan mindset & thoughtprocess, I have my sincere doubts? None could have conquered India had the so called Hindu’s been united. I am surprised that we are concerned reading history when it comes to how Aurangzeb looted & destroyed India but don’t bring to forefront how some Hindu’s transpired to sell this country to Britishers. Aurangzeb was prior to 1757, right? Someone rightly said, we accept history as it suits us. I am a Hindu myself but I fail to understand the discussion above. Duryodhan was never Duryodhan. Duryodhan was indeed named Suyodhan by his parents but its the bloody hostory that names him Duryodhan based on his deeds. WHY? Was bloody Yudhister not a hypocrite who sold his wife but we still call him “Dharamraj”. Why do you blame Suyodhan for all that happened to Panchali. On top, do you ever question why did the five brothers marry the same girl but we are quick to ask why Muslims marry twice or thrice. Lord Krishna had so many wives, Do ou dare to ask this question to him or in the society at large? Aurangzeb ruled for his guts & because most of our Maharajas were inefficient, Un-united & were more interested in “Vilasita” instead of fighting the rule of Aurangzeb. He came, conquered & did what he wanted to do. This is what anyone would do. Why don’t you also at the same time discuss those muslim rulers who did good to Hindu’s? When you write a comment, don’t just write on an abstract. Use the Context & then write the comments. We think ourselves to be the torch bearers of the next world. With such partisan mindset & thoughtprocess, I have my sincere doubts?

]]> By: Sid http://satyameva-jayate.org/2008/03/08/will-arundhati-roy-defend-gautier/comment-page-1/#comment-104868 Sid Mon, 13 Sep 2010 21:36:01 +0000 http://satyameva-jayate.org/?p=539#comment-104868 Kaffir, Thanks for mentioning Nanda. I did not know about "God Market". One of the true JNU jewels. Criticism is everywhere in the net. I found this link if anyone is interested for a passionate defense of this book: http://nirmukta.com/2010/01/21/review-the-god-market-how-globalization-is-making-india-more-hindu-by-meera-nanda/ Look at the few paras at the end. We techies are such a hated species in both east & west .... for different reasons. :) The problem with likes of Nanda is that they can not think of the India which will not run after the white masters, the India which values it's history/tradition/culture, the India which dares to walk into a road different from the one defined by welfare-minded commie-sympathizers of JNU. For if that happens Nandas and Thapars would be redundant, they need to publish original work to make sure that the university they work for attracts good students. Hard work does not really work for an intellectual, it so happens that it sometimes work for the much-hated techies. Kaffir,
Thanks for mentioning Nanda. I did not know about “God Market”. One of the true JNU jewels. Criticism is everywhere in the net. I found this link if anyone is interested for a passionate defense of this book:

http://nirmukta.com/2010/01/21/review-the-god-market-how-globalization-is-making-india-more-hindu-by-meera-nanda/

Look at the few paras at the end. We techies are such a hated species in both east & west …. for different reasons. :)

The problem with likes of Nanda is that they can not think of the India which will not run after the white masters, the India which values it’s history/tradition/culture, the India which dares to walk into a road different from the one defined by welfare-minded commie-sympathizers of JNU. For if that happens Nandas and Thapars would be redundant, they need to publish original work to make sure that the university they work for attracts good students. Hard work does not really work for an intellectual, it so happens that it sometimes work for the much-hated techies.

]]> By: Kaffir http://satyameva-jayate.org/2008/03/08/will-arundhati-roy-defend-gautier/comment-page-1/#comment-104859 Kaffir Mon, 13 Sep 2010 20:14:53 +0000 http://satyameva-jayate.org/?p=539#comment-104859 Sid, her asinine statements seem to reflect a similar asinine position by one Meera Nanda, who even wrote a book titled "God Market". Perhaps her (Nanda's) books is being released in paperback and Ms. Roy is giving her the publicity she needs? Sid, her asinine statements seem to reflect a similar asinine position by one Meera Nanda, who even wrote a book titled “God Market”. Perhaps her (Nanda’s) books is being released in paperback and Ms. Roy is giving her the publicity she needs?

]]> By: B Shantanu http://satyameva-jayate.org/2008/03/08/will-arundhati-roy-defend-gautier/comment-page-1/#comment-104754 B Shantanu Sun, 12 Sep 2010 22:54:35 +0000 http://satyameva-jayate.org/?p=539#comment-104754 Thanks Sid...will have a look Thanks Sid…will have a look

]]>