Comments on: The search for a historical “Rama”

By: Harsh

Harsh — Fri, 22 Jul 2011 12:45:26 +0000

Here’s one more article that discusses the numerous available evidences (in countries like Thailand, China, Malaysia, Sri Lanka, Pakistan, etc.) regarding the existence of Rama: http://agniveer.com/2164/rama-myth-or-hero/

By: dr n m sudhir

dr n m sudhir — Sat, 09 Jul 2011 11:00:58 +0000

archeological evidence is not conclusive upon the historicity of rama and the validity of events as narrated in ramayan,historicity of valmiki,availability of original manscripts of ramayan are also subject to doubt and mystery,emotional based conclusions are bound to be fallacious,also the mere existence of an entity of rama is not proof that he is god or incarnation of god whatever. it is well known that archeological evidence interpretation is subject to u turns through history.to give a foolproof verdict you need all the pieces of the jigsaw puzzle.there is a long way to go ,more research is needed,more investigation into originalsources is required,furher archaeological exploration needs to be carried out,to get the facts.
\

By: v.c.krishnan

v.c.krishnan — Fri, 09 May 2008 07:26:28 +0000

Dear Shantanu,
Congratulations on providing a forum for reading on my “TRUE HISTORY”.
Regards,
vck

By: Indian

Indian — Thu, 08 May 2008 13:38:38 +0000

http://www.newkerala.com/one.php?action=fullnews&id=57492

By: B Shantanu

B Shantanu — Thu, 22 Nov 2007 21:24:40 +0000

Bharat: Thanks. I will have a look at the links.