“how is reclaiming the truth related to happiness/unhappiness of the people.so i wish that you may put this question to the good muslim connects of yours and find out how by keeping the taj under secrecy by not answering the questions as presented on this site & elsewhere by the authorities that be, the happiness of your connections is ensured.”

looking at the situation, it being a historical issue, no “clear proofs” will be available, and the truth would retain ambiguity even after the proposed research into it..
what i am saying is that, when this research will be done, as certain things emerge out, they will be discussed in detail in the media, and under such scrutiny, there will be certain evidences that will suggest otherwise, and these will be available to those who will want to misuse..

yes, there are many muslims, who are mature enough to not get disturbed the slightest, even if the taj is officially labelled a hindu temple (the extreme case),

but there are innocent ones, who believe in hearsay, and some of them may get easily manipulated by knowing only part of the facts/evidences of the matter..

just clearing my view..

thanks for responding, and once again thanks for your wishes..

bye

how is reclaiming the truth related to happiness/unhappiness of the people.so i wish that you may put this question to the good muslim connects of yours and find out how by keeping the taj under secrecy by not answering the questions as presented on this site & elsewhere by the authorities that be, the happiness of your connections is ensured.it is good that being a 19 yr old you are on a path of self exploration of reality.

being a 55 year old i would only say keep your mind really open to all sides.

may your journey lead to the truth.

bye

and its not that for avoiding their anger and possible repurcussions of that,
we are paying a price very big..”
i am sorry if it was not clear that what i was (and am)talking about is only the present scenario..

like you are iterating, no price may be high for reclaiming truth
(it is possible reclaiming of truth, price is invariable anyways, and even after research it is likely that, only probabilities of the taj being a palace, temple, tomb, etc. will change, and counter arguments will remain to all things),
i am saying that, equally important is also the happiness and peace of people, reiterating that it is better if we the people and the media focusses on north east, exposing corruption, etc. than this issue..

still possible, that you dont agree to this, and we may not be on the same plane to discuss this..

in general,

the resistance on the arguments about muslims being one of us, part of us,
this has convinced me that we are definitely on different planes for dialogue..

expressing my personal view as a person nineteen year old, who hasnt witnessed the ugly things that may have happened in the past,

i dont have and would not ever have any disconnect with any person who is a muslim,
and AT LEAST my peers who are muslims are very good people, and i have not seen elements of things like them being unjust, lack of trustworthiness, and all the other things that you have talked about..

when i view a person, his/her religion doesnt taint my view, and i observe the same attitude at least in my peers of whichever religion they may be..

if after knowing:-
“the hindu even after knowing that temples were desecrated, women raped/enslaved and so on .. has never exhibited such behaviour,so they are an insensitive lot and need not be bothered about”

you say:-

“muslims are also indians..

and its not that for avoiding their anger and possible repurcussions of that,
we are paying a price very big..”

then we are on different planes and have to find matching partners for dialogue.

... i have not studied much
If that is your winning argument, please do not bother replying.