Ram Janmabhoomi, Rama Sethu and Babri Masjid

A well-wisher alerted me to this statement made by senior advocate Shri K Parasaran in the Supreme Court last week:

Government should avoid causing any damage to the “Ram Setu” as it might leave a permanent scar in the minds of people like the demolition of Babri Masjid in Ayodhya….

I am amazed…

Notice the multiple levels of mixing up, confusion and juxtapositioning that is going on here…

The matter of of Rama Sethu has somehow been clubbed with Babri Masjid,  juxtaposing the demolition of Babri Masjid that happended WITHOUT any government or official sanction with the destruction of Ram Sethu which is being forced with the full blessings of powers that be…

In the process, we have the extraordinary spectacle of Lord Shri Ram, a revered figure to millions being “bracketed” with Babar, a foreign invader.

What worries me most about this statement though is its implication(s) for the Janmabhoomi movement…

Any thoughts?  I am keen to hear responses.

Finally, a question to get you thinking: regardless of whether the Rama Sethu is man-made or is a natural formation, can it really be equated with Babri Masjid which was a structure deliberately constructed to humiliate a population that had been subjugated?

As someone wrote to me in an email, “…with “friends” like Sh. Parasaran, who needs enemies?” !

P.S. In case any of you is tempted to ask: my position on the demolition of Babri Masjid is that it was wrong, unfortunate and should not have happened.

Related Posts:

Voices of caution on SethuSamudram 

The search for a historical “Rama” 

Summary of the Historical Question - Ram Janmabhoomi 

A suggested stance on Kashi & Mathura 

Naman 1857 - A Tribute to the Martyrs

Please watch this short video and spare a moment to remember the brave souls who laid down their lives so that we may breath free

To share the video,  pl. forward the link:

http://satyameva-jayate.org/2008/05/08/naman-1857/ 

Jai Hind, Jai Bharat.

 

 

Wish I was 18 once again

Came across this yesterday: Armed forces fail to woo; 108 NDA seats vacant

“…Even as the Indian Army is grappling with acute shortage of middle rung officers due to their mass exodus to the corporate sector, the National Defence Academy…has fallen short of 108 quality cadets for its latest batch.

This year only 192 cadets turned up to join NDA, a premier joint services institution to train cadets for the three defence forces, as against the sanctioned strength of 300 for the batch.

…Commenting on the shortage of officers, Defence Minister A K Antony had said on April 29, “The shortage is a reality. The government will take positive and active action in consultation with the Army to lure youngsters to join the army.”

…efforts, including a vigorous media campaign, concentrated at making a career in the Army lucrative for those between age group 18 to 25, have failed to yield results.

…”The problem is that quality candidates are not coming to join the academies and the standards laid down for the officers cannot be lowered,” the official said.

Annually the defence forces need 2,100 officers. It is currently facing a shortage of 11,238 officers. A total of 46,615 is the sanctioned strength.

“If we start filling up the posts today, it is going to take another 20 years to make up for the shortage,” the official added.

The problem has further aggravated with as many as 3,000 officers seeking premature retirement just in the Army in the last three years, with most moving to the corporate sector.

“Earlier, corporate houses used to give good offers to Army officers. But now they are literally catching the capable candidates when they are young,” another senior official said.

“Many of the corporate houses are going to the villages and luring the candidates who have been selected for training to join their organisation at a high salary,” the official added…” 

So clearly the economics are not working…This will not surprise anyone who has been following the protests by military personnel against the Sixth Pay Commission (see e.g. A General’s letter in anguish to the PM)

Other than improving pay and perquisities, can anything else be done to make the armed forces an attractive career choice for youngsters?

I don’t know…and I should declare here that I am prejudiced.

I applied twice to join the NDA and on both occassions got rejected at the final stage…I was preparing to attend the SSB interview for the third time when someone older and wiser. told me that my problem was “aptitude” and I must have fared miserably on the psychological aptitude test to have been rejected twice. :-(

Apparently you cannot really “prepare” for the psychological test - and in that sense it is a useful filter to wean out unsuitable candidates ( - such as those who are rebels, eccentric and/or with a tendency to question authority - I think failed on all these counts).

Anyways, c’est la vie…

The exodus of talent mentioned above (with regards mid-level officers) is of course not unique to the armed forces. I personally know many IAS/ Central Services officers who have quit to join the corporate sector (for different reasons).

Some of you may also have read the sad story of an upright IPS officer who decided it was better to quit than continue in the system.  And here is a post by Vivek (an IFS officer) on why IAS officers quit.  

One of our loyal readers, Sanjeev Sabhlok quit the IAS many years ago (as did Dr JP Narayan who founded Loksatta Party).

But let me go back to the question I raised earlier:

“What, if anything, can be done to make the armed forces an attractive career choice for youngsters?”

  • Is a job in the armed forces really that low paying that it does not attract talent?
  • Is it lacking in glamour?
  • Or is it considered just plain “too risky”?
  • And, is serving your country and patriotism out of fashion?

Thoughts and comments welcome, as always.

Can readers who have first-hand experiences, insights or relatives in the armed forces share their views? and can all my “young” readers pitch in as well?

Jai Hind, Jai Bharat.

Related Post: Of Stars and Martyrs, Munnabhai vs. Manish Pitambare 

 

Recommended weekend reading

On the demoralising effect of the Sixth Pay Commission on the Armed Forces: A General’s letter in anguish to the PM

On the cheerleaders controversy: A Culture of Tolerance 

On the developments in Nepal: India gifts Nepal to China 

On how some Koranic schools in Africa are forcing children into beggary: Islamic Islamic schools turn African kids into beggars 

On Flat World Hindutva - A Moral Compass to guide on Contemporary Issues 

Excerpts below

Read more »

Why a Namaste is “healthier” than a Handshake

A recent BBC report suggests that, “…some computer keyboards harbour more harmful bacteria than a toilet seat

“…Out of 33 keyboards swabbed, four were regarded as a potential health hazard and one harboured five times more germs than one of the office’s toilet seats.  Microbiologist Dr Peter Wilson said a keyboard was often “a reflection of what is in your nose and in your gut”.  

During the Which? tests in January this year, a microbiologist deemed one of the office’s keyboards to be so dirty he ordered it to be removed, quarantined and cleaned.  It had 150 times the recommended limit for bacteria - five times as filthy as a lavatory seat tested at the same time, the research found.

Should somebody have a cold in your office, or even have gastroenteritis, you’re very likely to pick it up from a keyboard…

Poor personal hygiene, such as not washing hands after going to the toilet, could also be to blame, it said…

…Research by the University of Arizona last year found the average office desktop harboured 400 times more bacteria than the average office toilet seat.

Now guess what happens when you take your fingers off that keyboard and shake someone’s hand.

A “Namaste” would be a lot healthier… for everyone. Below is another reason why.

Related Post:

A “Namaste” may be your safest bet